tekisui
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-26-08 11:03 PM
Original message |
Hillary tries to pin Obama on "Reject" vs. "Denounce". What about "Wrong" vs. "Sorry"? |
|
How does Hillary want it with words? They are "just words" and don't mean anything, or "reject" is leagues different than "denounce".
Well, how about not only saying you would vote differently knowing what you know, but say you were "wrong" and you take "responsibility" and are "sorry" for you vote to give chimpy the power to invade Iraq?
|
bluestateguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-26-08 11:03 PM
Response to Original message |
1. The Clintons have a lot of experience with word parsing |
|
Deciphering it is like pulling teeth.
|
HeraldSquare212
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-26-08 11:04 PM
Response to Original message |
2. No kidding - she'd like it back, but won't apologize? |
karynnj
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-26-08 11:04 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Not to mention she did NOT reject the support of the party she described as racist in 2006, |
Rosa Luxemburg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-26-08 11:05 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I think she was rude there |
|
he's already said he had denounced him
|
Window
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-26-08 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. She was trying to score a point, but it backfired, as usual. |
tekisui
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-26-08 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. She still can't understand that Obama is just that good. |
|
He still leaves her dizzy from her own punches.
|
Ravy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-26-08 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
8. She was being charitable to him.. offering him a chance to take |
|
a bad answer back.
"Obama denounces Farrikan, but accepts his support" would have been a very bad headline for him tomorrow and very damaging to the Democratic party.
|
Rosa Luxemburg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-26-08 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
10. but he hasn't accepted F's support as he can't control what Fdoes? |
tekisui
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-26-08 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
12. Puh-lease. She thought she had him. |
|
She thought he wouldn't rise to the challenge and "reject" his support. She thought she could peg him at "denounce". And, like so many times in this race, she underestimated his political ability.
|
ecstatic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-26-08 11:15 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Bingo! I'm glad you posted this because I'm out of threads |
|
If Obama was petty he could have cut into her final speech and made a pompous statement about how John Edwards and John Kerry came out and apologized for their IWR votes and that clear language is needed in this case, since millions are now dead.
|
tekisui
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-26-08 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. It hit me like a brick. |
|
I couldn't believe she was wanting to parse reject and denounce, but Obama slammed it back in her face, without looking bad.
He is a professional.
|
bigbrother05
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-26-08 11:22 PM
Response to Original message |
11. it depends on what the definition of is, is |
mudesi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-26-08 11:25 PM
Response to Original message |
13. She IS a Clinton! (nm) |
BattyDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-26-08 11:28 PM
Response to Original message |
|
He ended up using both words and made her look silly for even bringing it up.
|
tekisui
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-26-08 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
15. She has been doing him "favors" since Nevada. |
|
Obama should thank her for her running such a failing campaign.
|
tekisui
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-27-08 12:15 AM
Response to Original message |
16. She failed a her latest gotcha attempt. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:02 PM
Response to Original message |