Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama BLEW OPPORTUNITY to show grasp of key Foreign Policy issue

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:13 PM
Original message
Obama BLEW OPPORTUNITY to show grasp of key Foreign Policy issue
The Russert question regarding the upcomming Russion election was a jump ball -- Obama allowed Clinton to grab it.

What was worse, Clinton rambled through generalities of an answer that make in clear that she was not really familiar with the name of the successor or the specifics of the constitutional crisis being debated in Russia.

Obama could have jumped in and make clear he understoon the genesis of the Dmitry Medvedev/Vladimir Putin political partnership and the implications of him beign hand-picked to succeed and his proposal to change the constitution to give new powers to the Prime Minister role to which Putin would ascend.

He failed to express himself with any more command of the facts than Clinton. A MISSED OPPORTUNITY that showed his need for a strong National Security V.P.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't think either one of them could give a good answer to that question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subsuelo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. as if either of them *really* grasp foreign policy all that much
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. This was OBAMA'S chance to differentiate himself from Clintons phony mumblings re NS issues
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 11:28 PM by Sensitivity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ORDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I agree, both were very weak on the Russia question. It was
embarrassing. I'd give HRC +1 for doing a better job of looking like she knew what she was talking about better than Obama, but her answer was 99% fluff.

:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think that whole issue of being handpicked by a former president hits a little too
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 11:17 PM by izzybeans
close to home for Hillary to really grasp. It would force her to realize the oligarchic ramifications of her run. As a member of the ruling class she really doesn't want to go too deep into this issue. If I were Obama I would have said just that. to bad he's too nice for that type of game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RunningFromCongress Donating Member (519 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. they BOTH blew it. It would have been a knockout for either, and they both let it miss
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. With Brzezinski on his NS team, Obama should have command of U.S.- Russia issues
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RunningFromCongress Donating Member (519 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. They both should have a mastery of it, they're running for POTUS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Brzezinski is not on his team
He has advised him on a few occasions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. Don't agree. I think both of them are similarly knowledgeable...
and it's not like it's any big secret - I could have answered that question as well. I don't think there was really anything much for Obama to say that Hillary hadn't said already: if he had gone into the detail suggested in the OP I think most of the audience would have thought he was being a showoff and/or lost interest.

I'm fairly knowledgeable on the subject (I've been to Russia and have always been interested in Russian politics) but I didn't feel Obama had anything to gain by giving a lecture on the subject. There were other times when I felt 'Yes! So glad you finally drove that point home' (eg about the question of acting against AQ in Pakistan) and some times when I felt 'Gee, why don't you just say ___', but the Russia question wasn't one of them. Frankly I thought he made his Foreign Affairs point best by taking a closer look at the Pakistan question and doing a gentle 'Told you so'.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
10. I was a bit disappointed with his response. With Kerry and Brzezinski as advisors,
he should have done better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #10
37. Kerry only just got back from Pakistan and Afghanistan, so I don't think they've huddled
recently. I expect Obama will be playing some serious catch up. Neither candidate sounded like they were sure of their answers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #37
42. Well they need to schedule some huddle time soon. Obama does have a lot of ground to cover.
However, he is a *very* quick study. Though I've always favored Kerry in the Senate, depending on what our majority is, Obama may need to consider offering Kerry a cabinet position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
12. Obama simply won the point by not misprounouncing his name...
She Blew it.. he didn't score any points, but he didn't lose any. She lost some.. her "international experience" came across as a major INEXPERIENCE by the fact that she doesn't even know how to pronounce the guys name. That's a big loss IMO...

Obama played it safe.. i'm not sure he knows much more about the guy then Hillary does - but at least he appeared to know more and kept within his range.

Not a great question for either, but he didn't fumble - she did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. This was worse that Bush refering to Musharaf as "the general" because he did not know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlyingSquirrel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 04:31 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. I was actually expecting them to ask him if he could pronounce the name
After she mispronounced it. They let him off the hook, I'm not sure he knew the name either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 04:36 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. Yeah, like Obama knew the guys name
Pretty obvious he didn't. He let her have it for a reason. He didn't have a clue what to say. When it was his turn he simply repeated what she said. In fact he did that several times during the debate. (When he wasn't bullshitting about his health care plan).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Labors of Hercules Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #18
41. the finer points of debating escape someone so emotionally biased.
What's obvious is you don't like Obama so you perceive what you want to perceive. He did not in any way appear clueless, because he isn't clueless or ignorant. If you think he is, that's fine... you can think anything you want. But thinking it doesn't make it true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ginnyinWI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #12
38. as the frontrunner,
Obama is smarter to just sit back and give Hillary room to shoot herself in the foot. And tone is more important than spouting the most facts. If he had interrupted Hillary or otherwise made a spectacle out of himself, he'd have lost the point. As it was, she did.

FWIW, Susan Rice, his foreign policy advisor was on Morning Joe today and said that of course he knows the future Russian leader's name and that she thought his answers on foreign policy ran circles around Hillary's. She looked very proud of his performance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
14. Obama didn't need to do ANYTHING except not light himself on fire
He wasn't trying to HIT OPPORTUNITIES.

He won by not losing, which was his campaigns goal going on (as well it should be).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. That was his chance to put her away
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. She's already put away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 04:40 AM
Response to Original message
19. He answered well
Edited on Wed Feb-27-08 04:42 AM by redstate_democrat
I think he did fine with the Russia question. At least he didn't say "whatever" after mispronouncing the guy's name. In other news, he was strong on stating that he would be prepared to defend American interests if Iraq were to totally have a cataclysmic breakdown after withdrawal. Hillary didn't seem to want to answer that "hypothetical".

I also liked the fact that, and he was given this question first, the US would not maintain a presence in Iraq if we were asked to leave, pointing to the sovereignty of Iraq, which is something McInsane/Bush seem to not really give a damn about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 05:18 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. That's my new favorite political cartoon of the season.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SKKY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 05:09 AM
Response to Original message
20. Obama won by letting Hilary stumble all over herself...
I thought it was a smart move. He'll have plenty of time to show was he knows. These little nuggets that present themselves are few and far between.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 06:59 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. It was his opportunity to take commamd and dismiss the mumbling pretender to Foreign Pol expertize
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SKKY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #24
28. He'll have plenty of time to do that when he debates McCain...
...it's a marathon, not sprint.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 05:33 AM
Response to Original message
22. Their debate prep teams both blew it
I understand that campaign scheduling is tight but for fuck's sake, make sure that your candidate can pronounce the name right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 07:25 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. Knowing the leadership issues in the G8 is the ABC's in a pres race
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. Seriously I hope someone is getting fired in both campaigns tonight
Edited on Wed Feb-27-08 08:15 AM by Hippo_Tron
It's one thing when you're George W Bush or Mike Huckabee and someone told you the name 1000 times but you're still too fucking stupid to remember. It's another when you're an intelligent person like Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama and you have arguably the best foreign policy advisors in the country but someone forgot to make sure that you took the time to be fully briefed by them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #22
32. I agree - Obama needs to huddle with someone like Kerry between campaign stops.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #22
34. when was the last time they were asked about Russia?
i can't remember the last time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #34
43. When's the last time Russia was having an election next week?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shaniqua6392 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 06:26 AM
Response to Original message
23. I would assume he did not know enough about it to jump in.
Otherwise he would have. He failed to express himself with more command of the facts because he did not know the facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
26. You're probably right
but I don't think either candidate did themselves any big favors with that question. I mean what are they supposed to say? We should invade Russia?? Impose sanctions? Instead they threw out a bunch of stuff you could read in Newsweek and bitched about Bush. I'm not sure what else there was to do with that question but I guess that's why I'm not running for president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. We should Revoke their WTO Membership!!!
Oh wait...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
30. Obama did the smart thing. He's ahead; his job is to avoid saying stupid shit at all costs.
If he gives a specific answer, he runs the risk of making a minor factual error, incorrectly implying a specific policy (opening himself to debate on that policy's merits), or saying something that might be construed as particularly insulting to either Medvedev or Putin. When you're as far ahead as Obama is, you have little to gain and much to lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
31. John Kerry or Al Gore would have knocked that one irretrievably out of the park.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. True, true. Painful to be reminded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #31
35. Definately true - but HRC didn't do that well herself
Her answer reminded me of blue book essays in college when you know very little and need to write more than a sentence or two. She makes the same point in a least 4 different ways - that the likely successor is a hand picked Putin guy and Ptin will still be the power behind the throne.

She also took a very cheap shot in hitting Obama for not holding hearings on Afghanistan in the SFRC overseeing Europe, because it involves NATO. The fact is that hearings on this WERE held where they should have been in the Near East Asia subcommittee and the full committee, due to its importance. It is very clear that Biden and Kerry are putting enormous efforts in on this - they are the ones with a bill on how to go forward. Both have been there several times and are on the job. (http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=4795016&mesg_id=4795016 )

It would be showboating if Obama used his sub-committee to address this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. Hillary sounded a bit scared in answering that question -
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #36
39. She was scared. I was waiting for Obama to drop the hammer. Zbig's not doing his job
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calmblueocean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #31
40. Heh, true enough. I wrote a little about that last night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC