Will the tone of Hillary's stump speeches change after this debate?

[Johnny__Motown]

If she does stop the "theatrical" performances of this weekend will it mean that she thinks she won the debate? Or might it mean that she simply sees that "going negative" in that matter simply did not help her?

If she does continue with the more aggressive comments, will it mean she thinks she lost the debate (or did not win strongly enough to make a difference). Or might it mean that she sees it as helping her chances regardless of the debate?



Just curious. I think she will be back to waving stuff around and speaking in a loud voice by friday afternoon, because her numbers will not have improved since the debate.



*Disclaimer* I tried to not use any phrase or term that might be viewed as sexist or insulting in any way, if I overlooked something I apologize.

[samdogmom]

1. Ummm! What stump speeches????

She's going to be the Senator from NY for awhile I'm afraid! There aren't going to be "stump" speeches in her future!

[Johnny__Motown]

2. Rallies, whatever you want to call what she is doing on the campaign trail now

[FlyingSquirrel]

3. Well, if her public appearances after the last debate are any indicator,

she'll be way nice.

;)

[samdogmom]

4. Again--she's going to be JUNIOR SENATOR FROM NEW YORK! Period.

There's no need for any speeches. Period. Her tone doesn't matter, because she'll no longer matter!

Get it?

Barack is going to be the nominee--she's finished!

[TexasObserver]

5. She will go hard with the negative, the sarcasm, etc. the whole next week.

She'll repeat the lines she's used on the stump since Saturday.