Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Blows his 'Sister Soujah' Moment -- Huffington Post

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Demagitator Donating Member (236 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 03:34 AM
Original message
Obama Blows his 'Sister Soujah' Moment -- Huffington Post
Edited on Wed Feb-27-08 03:41 AM by Demagitator
February 27, 2008

Because it was on Louis Farrakhan that the debate shifted and you really saw the differences in these candidates. As much as it's popular to beat up on Bill Clinton these days, at least he knew a moment when a marker is laid down. Last night, Barack Obama missed his Sister Souljah moment by a mile.

As a Scots-Irish broad, I saw Obama's tepid response to Farrakhan, and was appalled. Emails from Jewish friends confirmed that I wasn't alone. That Obama had to be led to this reality is proof of his ruffle no feathers at any cost mentality.

OBAMA: Tim, I have to say I don't see a difference between denouncing and rejecting. There's no formal offer of help from Minister Farrakhan that would involve me rejecting it. But if the word "reject" Senator Clinton feels is stronger than the word "denounce," then I'm happy to concede the point, and I would reject and denounce.

It has nothing to do with him believing in our "special relationship" with Israel, or insinuating anything remotely anti-semitic. It's about moral courage and the conciliatory reflex he has to extend grace to people who haven't earned and don't deserve it. People like Louis Farrakhan.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/taylor-marsh/obama-blows-his-sister-s_b_88647.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 03:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. I was Shocked to Find Taylor Marsh Shilling for Hillary...JUST SHOCKED!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BringBigDogBack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 03:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. heh. you and me both.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 03:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I know, what a goof
I was reading it in disbelief, and then saw Taylor Marsh... oooooohhh. She's embarrassed herself as badly as Hillary in this primary. I think Hillary will recover a lot better than Taylor Marsh will. Unless her goal was to become the Ann Coulter of the Dem Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 06:31 AM
Response to Reply #4
23. Well said Sandnsea.
Taylor Marsh is a bad joke.



Peace:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 07:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
28. Me too - and as an English speaking person, I thought denounce stronger than reject
Edited on Wed Feb-27-08 07:06 AM by karynnj
I reject advertising suggestions daily without a thought. Denouncing something requires some moral energy.

I am Jewish and I reject the ridiculous attempt to destroy a man's name through quilt by association. Not to mention - that party that HRC rejected - she was on their line in 2006. There had been a leadership change, but the group of antisemites in Manhattan still belong to it. If HRC is making this a litmus test shouldn't she have sacrificed their line in 2006 when she was running against a very weak candidate?

http://www.elections.state.ny.us/NYSBOE/elections/2006/general/2006_ussen.pdf



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 03:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. Obama usually does election strategy quite well, neutralizing his true feelings
sometimes, however, it does leave a bad taste
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Schema Thing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
33. which of course, can be paraphrased as, "kill the jews!"
Obama's true feelings
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyorDeath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 03:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. Obama will be the next POTUS

Your post is SHIT!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlyingSquirrel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 03:45 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Fling it back at him!
Poo fight! Poo fight!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 03:41 AM
Response to Original message
6. It could hurt him if the msm decides to cover it
But we all saw SNL didn't we...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 03:45 AM
Response to Original message
7. Taylor Marsh is humanities best friend!!
She is a Goddess for the Peace Goddess
within the Goddess of democracy.


I bow down, as an ignornate male and human being to her
wisdom and fairness.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susankh4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #7
31. I am with ya on this!
I am finding the most interesting things on her blog... that the MSM just seems to keep ignoring.

Ms. Marsh is not hurting herself one bit by aligning with Hillary.

When this all goes down... and our election is, essentially, stolen by the MSM's pandering to Obama ... and the party elders (all men) ganging up on Hillary.... many, many Dems will be forever indebted to her.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 03:47 AM
Response to Original message
9. He sure shut Timmy up fast when he was reading some of Farrakhan's
statements, like he didn't want anyone to know about them. Was he ashamed of him or just attempting to cover his political @ss?

It did startle me somewhat to hear him say Minister Farrakhan. In that kind of situation, you don't really want to show that sort of respect. Big mistake. Hope he has to pay for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 03:51 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Imagine if Hillary called David Duke "representative Duke"
But we know Hillary would never do something like that. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
casus belli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 03:49 AM
Response to Original message
10. So his denouncment and rejection isn't denouncement or rejection enough.
Edited on Wed Feb-27-08 03:50 AM by casus belli
So what you're saying is...it doesn't matter how strongly he speaks out against Farrakhan, it won't be strongly enough for people whose sole purpose is to scratch at the surface until something catches.

I'm just waiting for the comparisons of Obama to the Beast as mentioned in Revelation. I don't know where else they could go with these attacks short of accusing him of wanting to destroy the earth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progdonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 04:13 AM
Response to Reply #10
18. I don't think anything will come close enough...
Edited on Wed Feb-27-08 04:14 AM by progdonkey
If Obama said, "Farrakhan is a fucking fuck who can go fuck himself. Fuck that fucker," the Hillary supporters would then say he's "rude" and "doesn't have the diplomatic personality necessary to be president," or something like that.

But referring to Farrakhan as "minister" is "showing respect to someone who doesn't deserve it."

Damned if he does; damned if he doesn't. Which is ironic considering that's what Hillary's had to deal with from the crazy right wingers who say she's a bad mother for staying with that philandering husband and setting a bad example for Chelsea, but if she had left him, she'd have been a bad wife and mother for not forgiving her remorseful husband and leaving Chelsea a broken home.

:crazy: The Crazy--it gets around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
casus belli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 04:24 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. The Crazy - we need a cure. :) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 03:51 AM
Response to Original message
11. Good for him.
Edited on Wed Feb-27-08 03:52 AM by autorank
The original Sister Soulja moment should have told us a lot about who we were dealing with.

The execution of the retarded inmate in Arkansas told us even more.

"It's about moral courage and the conciliatory reflex he has to extend grace to people who haven't earned and don't deserve it."

I'll take that any day over any bull shit stunt. There are some major areas where I think Obama is headed in the wrong direction or with the wrong people. This, however, speaks well of the man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 03:52 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Yup, Bill Clinton didn't just talk about reducing murder he brought change and did it
Edited on Wed Feb-27-08 03:53 AM by jackson_dem
Too bad crime has risen again with the rethugs in charge.

Bill Clinton had the audacity to call out Souljah saying white people should be killed. How evil of him! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 03:59 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Nonsense. Here's death on a massive scale...

How about these dead due to bombing Iraq and starving the country through a US-British embargo enforced through the UN. When asked what she thought about the .5 million deaths of children due to this atrocity, Madeleine Albright said, "It was worth it."

So you take your US reductions in murder (if there were any) but ad back 500,000 Iraqi children and where are you?

From The Guardian, Mar. 4, 2000
http://www.guardian.co.uk/theguardian/2000/mar/04/weekend7.weekend9

"This is a war against the children of Iraq on two fronts: bombing, which in the last year cost the British taxpayer £60 million. And the most ruthless embargo in modern history. According to Unicef, the United Nations Children's Fund, the death rate of children under five is more than 4,000 a month - that is 4,000 more than would have died before sanctions. That is half a million children dead in eight years. If this statistic is difficult to grasp, consider, on the day you read this, up to 200 Iraqi children may die needlessly. "Even if not all the suffering in Iraq can be imputed to external factors," says Unicef, "the Iraqi people would not be undergoing such deprivation in the absence of the prolonged measures imposed by the Security Council and the effects of war."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 07:11 AM
Response to Reply #14
30. Clinton did support some excellent programs that did help,
but those numbers also benefited by a shift in demographics to fewer people in the most likely to commit violence category and the reduction in the availability of crack cocaine. (partially because we stopped letting it come into the country to fund RW actions in Central America.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 06:35 AM
Response to Reply #11
24. Yes. It speaks very well of him.



Peace:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 03:52 AM
Response to Original message
13. The second to last sentence in the OP could be applied to his position
of meeting with foreign dictators without pre-conditios.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 04:13 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. That position has morphed into Hillary's also. When questioned further,
in the last debate, he came around to her position that the ground needed to be prepared first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrRobotsHolyOrders Donating Member (681 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 03:54 AM
Response to Original message
15. Taylor Marsh is a shrill moron
She should be placed in a rocket filled with cobras, and fired into the sun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 03:55 AM
Response to Original message
16. Taylor Marsh writes
"needs another pillow. (Laughter, boos.)"

funny, all I heard were the boos. I was embarrassed for Hillary and for her campaign for allowing her to do another lame backfiring scripted sound bite joke/slam. It didn't work for her in Austin with the "change you can Xerox" and it didn't work last night with the "ask Barack if he's comfortable and needs another pillow". Both are snide and childish, both were scripted, and neither were funny. Just pathetic.

If you want to see a total deconstruction slam (which may have been scripted as well, or may not), see Lloyd Bentsen and the "you sir, are no Jack Kennedy" line... now THAT was a slam!


Anyway, Taylor is being disingenuous again, suggesting that the audience laughed at this lame attempt by Hillary. I didn't hear it, only the boos. Sorry Taylor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 04:24 AM
Response to Original message
20. Taylor Marsh has zero credibility
OP knows Huffington Post has cred where Taylor Marsh has none.

Very deceptive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 04:29 AM
Response to Original message
22. By Taylor Marsh
Hillary Rulez!

the end
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
25. I just want to say that:
as an Obama supporter, I adios, blackball, brush off, burn, cashier, cast, cast aside, cast off, chuck, decline, deny, despise, disallow, disbelieve, discard, discount, discredit, disdain, dismiss, eighty-six, eliminate, exclude, heave-ho, ice out, jettison, jilt, junk, kill, nix, not buy, pass by, pass on, pass up, put down, rebuff, refuse, renounce, repel, reprobate, repudiate, repulse, scoff, scorn, scout, scrap, second, shed, shoot down, slough, spurn, throw away, throw out, thumbs down, turn down, veto, Farrakhan's position.

I guess that makes me anti-semitic, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
26. Taylor Marsh is not credible
on anything about this race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RogueTrooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
27. Why, after 8 years of George W. Bush
does a Democrat need to have a "Sister Soujah" moment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
29. Stupid Taylor Marsh - even more wacky than the right wing wackos...
How He Won it

This exchange right here:

Have you ever seen a candidate extract himself from such a maddeningly stupid argument so adroitly? He read viewers' minds — we were all thinking, "What's the difference between 'denounce' and 'reject?'" — and made Hillary look silly for trying to create a distinction. It's this seemingly effortless ability to rise above the tedious semantics of American politics that makes Obama so difficult to attack. Even if you play better than him, he's better at mocking the game. McCain's got his work cut out for him.

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MTM3MGI5NGQxMjg2NDUxNzY1MmJiMDZhZTZkY2E2NWE=
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
32. Batshit crazy shilling for a batshit crazy candidate.
A year ago I would have only made a statement like that about McCain. No wonder they are such good friends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
34. What more can Barack do, short of sending Farrakhan to Guantanamo Bay?
Is he supposed to have a duel with him or something? This is nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC