Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anyone notice how Timmy tried to gotcha Hillary with Putins Successor?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 06:38 AM
Original message
Anyone notice how Timmy tried to gotcha Hillary with Putins Successor?
He asked Hillary about Putin's successor and she answered it perfectly and when she was finished, he tried the gotcha. "Do you know his name"? She did---albeit she had a hard time pronouncing it...Medvedev...which I can't blame her.

It was just another bullshit tactic, one of many the pumpkin head used in this debate.

Fuck Tim Russert!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Russert Potato is a pig, that I think most can agree on. nt
Edited on Wed Feb-27-08 06:51 AM by MassDemm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NDambi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. On MSNBC after the debate..Pumpkinhead said..
Edited on Wed Feb-27-08 06:56 AM by NDambi
He asked the question and looked at both of them, it wasn't addressed to anyone specifically, yet Hillary jumped in...to answer.

I have to see the clip though..but that's his position.

Even though, I said in jest last night, looks like Hills is ready on day one, I really don't fault her for not being able to pronounce the name correctly...shooo..it's difficult. It was her whatever part that was funny though..ha ha..I say that alot, check my sig.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. He said that this morning, too
He said he didn't address the question to anyone specifically and Hillary was the first to answer it.

I seem to remember the question being directed to her but I couldn't swear to that.

I thought it was quite a gotcha question, though. Kind of like "who is the President of Pakistan?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NDambi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. They showed the clip..he didn't ask anyone specifically..he just threw it out there
and Hill jumped in..in fact you can see Obama looking at her..and she took the bait. Smart move on his part..lol..as Pumpkinhead said, she should have said, go head Barack, you take this one...and I'll follow up..but she didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Thanks
Goes to show how unreliable my memory can be. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #5
18. Or
"Who is currently the president of the United States?"

Now THAT'S a "gotcha" question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
19. Ha ---i saw Timmy whining about that is am. also. he looked pissed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
20. Next time he can host it like "Jeopardy," with buzzers.
Can't stand Russert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoJoWorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. He tried gotcha on both---- an equal opportunity scumbag, as usual
That is all he knows how to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
32. I agree, equal opportunity. And he acts like he's revealed a terrible dark secret...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flordehinojos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. i did notice that ... i also noticed (at least it seemed to me) that before the
9:40 PM break Hillary wanted to respond to something BO had said which needed to be answered with factual information. Deviated Septum Brian Williams shut her up saying they needed to take a break and that she would get a chance to reply when they came back from the break. When they came back from the break, however, Deviated Septum Brian Williams protected his candidate of choice by going immediately to a question for him, without even giving Hillary the chance to reply to the previous round, or without even acknowledging that he had told her she could reply on the return from the break. I also notice that after that break he and timmy rushette hardly gave hillary any time to talk or express her selling points. (and with the name of Putin successor's, i thought timmy rushette was making sure BO knew who it was and how to say it by having hillary field the question and the name...just in case. i figured timmy rushette did not want his candidate of choice to make a bush like gaffe.)

i also thought that timmy rushette's "hypotheticals" were totally absurd and ridiculous and i am so proud of the woman who told him, "you are making too many hypotheticals" and pointed him back to the reality on the ground.

i was also proud of the woman who said, "i've repeatedly said that my vote was a sincere vote" but would take it back if she could.

i noticed how barack obama answered some of the iran/"pahkistan" questions(as he likes to pronounce pakistan)/afghanistan by implying that he would be ready to defend THE HOMELAND .... (the HOMELAND those bush fascist words, get it? Who was he speaking too? was he speaking to bush republicans,to those neocons who cannot take a step without leaving a trail of fear mongering so as to submit people into some sort of slavery and/or be governed by fear? was he talking to the people who bought the bush kool aid? was he reassuring people in some code words that he was somehow going to continue with the bush propaganda spin? i mean, was he talking to those people who have made oodles of money by giving us the homeland bushit propaganda spin? Was he talking to the military/industrial complex? i mean, whatever happened to saying, THE NATION ... OR TO saying, THIS GREAT NATION OF OURS?)

timmy rushette looked so maniacky vile last night ... brian deviated septum williams had some white powder splashed over his hair ... i suppose he thought it made him look authoritative enough, or presidential enough, or respectable enough, or old enough to be asking question of a very wise woman ... and then his voice and that monotone incantation of all of his questions ... what a load of bull ... and going to break to make dollars is such an insult to the people of this nation who are really more interested in listening to the candidates than in listening to the money making machinery of corporate ads. i thought they did a great disservice to this nation by going to break and then by not following up on a promise to continue the dialog were left off when they came back from break. i contend, and i accuse brian deviated septum williams, of pulling the need to go to commercial break just so as to disrupt the discourse at hand. that really showed the cravenness of his soul.

did in the end timmy rushette and deviated septum brian williams realized that they better shut hillary up or she would be one upping them and their candidate of choice.

yes. i think they did. and i think that is why they shut her up after that first break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GCP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
7. Oh bullshit - it wasn't a gotcha question
If even I know Medvedev's name, I should bloody well hope either of them would have known it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. Oh bullshit bullshit...
then why ask her if she new the name?

That was a classic gotcha question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GCP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #14
34. She SHOULD know his damn name
Edited on Wed Feb-27-08 09:17 AM by Godlesscommieprevert
We all ripped Bush for not knowing Musharraf's name. If I know it, either of these two should have known it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #34
39. She did know his name
and she clearly knew the guy and his politics. Why the fuck did Timmy have to ask her at the end of the question--- what's his name? He knew it, why did he have to ask her---- because it's a gotcha question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
48. It wouldn't have been a gotcha question if she would have nailed it
First of all, it's Medvedev. Pretty simple name. It practically rolls off the tongue. What really annoyed me is how she blew it off with a "whatever". Sorry, Hill. The names of people you're dealing with are important. It shows that we are interested in their culture and that they have importance. This is a big pet peeve of mine when people can't get people's names right just because they're not Smith or Jones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
8. I thought the whole intro was a GOTCHA Clinton attempt!
Debates are supposed to be about issues..policies... NOT he said she said...blah blah blah...flame flame flame..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #8
28. True.
But she requested a debate on tactics over the weekend. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
From The Left Donating Member (670 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
9. That's what a moderator is supposed to do
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
casus belli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. I think you have moderator and prosecutor mixed up. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
casus belli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
10. Obama supprter here, but he was extremely rude to Hillary.
There were several occasions where he just cut her off to argue counter points in the middle of her trying to answer question. He was completely rude. This isn't him breaking a news story, he's moderating a presidential primary. He needs to better understand his place.

That said, he tried several gotcha moments with both. I think some of the points he was pushing and trying to make into issues...like his "Will you right here and now state that you will use public financing in the General Election?", etc. He was a jerk, he made it very unenjoyable to watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #10
23. I actually
think the campaign finance question directed at Obama was not a "gotcha" question. It was fair. If they can't answer simple questions like that without it being deemed a gotcha, then really what can we expect. These questions involve their positions on issues. These questions revolve around things they have said and/or done. They should be prepared to answer the questions. If the question is misguided, hints at an untruth, then they should make that known. Everyone tuning in probably has the aptitude to discern whether or not the question and following answer is satisfactory and will respond to it accordingly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
casus belli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #23
29. It wasn't the question...
It was his persistence in asking it then rephrasing it and asking it again, and adding a point and asking again. he did it with several questions. The Farrakhan question was another good example. He asked the question no less than three times,adding additional quotes each time without changing the substance of the question. he was very obviously trying to trip them up. While that might be appropriate for an investigative journalist, it's not appropriate for a moderator in a debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #10
24. Thank You
You got it exactly.:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #10
26. i agree basically with you. thanks. Its all about him--which i find distracting
as the debate goes on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent-Voter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
13. hillary has a far superior knowledge of foreign policy, including medvedmedvedwhatever
Her Shrillness came off as a fucking idiot, again. Ready on day 1 my ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
casus belli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #13
33. In fairness, she probably should change that to...
Edited on Wed Feb-27-08 09:15 AM by casus belli
ready "on the health care issue" from day one. "Let me just add something, this is too important". It is important, but she really runs with this issue, pushing other important issues to the back burner in favor of discussing this one more.

Geez. I wonder why no one has called her on the obvious. She often cites her experience - on health care she claimed to have been working on it for 15 years. As president she only gets four. If she hasn't had any luck making progress in 15 years, why should we expect "the skies to open up, and celestial choirs to sing" for the passage of health care in her four years as president?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
15. And Obama was clueless about it and avoided it
She definately owns Obama in foriegn policy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
16. he should have asked Obama first.
Edited on Wed Feb-27-08 08:51 AM by bigtree
I would have like to seen the depth of his knowledge on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent-Voter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #16
25. Her Shrillness jumped into that question, and got her ass handed to her. No surprises here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #25
40. She knew his name numnuts...
that is your name right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent-Voter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #40
51. Medevewhatever is not his name you fucking idiot.
Edited on Wed Feb-27-08 03:57 PM by Independent-Voter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #16
31. He directed the question to both of them. If Hillary were smarter, she might have
seen the direction of this debate, let Obama go, and use her time to fill in whatever Obama "missed" or "didn't know." However, she decided she'd leap into it, and got in a bit over her head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
17. How exactly is
asking the potential leader of the free world the name of PUTIN'S successor a "gotcha" question? Is the bar set that low?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #17
22. Recall it was a gottcha question for Bush years back. Still is today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #22
27. Well
every question directed at Bush is a gotcha question. Asking what he ate for breakfast this morning is a "gotcha" question with Bush. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #27
35. You are right on that. te he. But it was a gottcha question question last evening for Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
21. He's A Piss-Faced, Pus-Gut, Puke-Faced, Pencildick, Diaper-Wearing, Sexist, repuke
Well, you get the idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vssmith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #21
54. Yes for sure, and he is a poor excuse for a human being as well
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. He's Human? When Did That Happen?
Whoda thunk it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
30. Wow. We're setting the bar Bush-level low, aren't we?
Edited on Wed Feb-27-08 09:10 AM by Occam Bandage
Asking a potential President to name a world leader is not exactly dirty politics.

Seriously, this should have been a softball. If she says "Medvedev" cooly and confidently, she looks great. If she stumbles and--after getting prompted with the correct answer--finishes with "Med-ve-dw-oh-whatever," then it take a bit of the wind out of her Ready On Day One sails.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #30
37. She clearly explained what the guy was all about...
and that should have been enough...but no---timmy wanted to see if she knew his name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
36. Gotcha is the only game that porcine puke has in his armoury...
...his other trick is slavish worship of the gop...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
38. I remember some reporter did the same gotcha with Bush back in 2000.
I think it was the leader of Pakistan. Bush didn't know how to pronounce it but hew as an ahole about it. Clinton laughed about not being able to pronounce Medved or whatever his name is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
41. If he was trying that he would have brought up her "he has no soul comment"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livetohike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
42. I wish McCain and Huckabee would debate and asked these
questions. I'm sure neither has a clue who the successor to Putin is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superkia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
43. If your ready on day one and your foriegn policy is so strong...
you would have no problem answering these questions. To me those were softballs for her to make herself look good, I would think that both of them would have known more about him and they really didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
44. I think it was fair game and she was ready for it.
Look she touts herself for her foriegn policy experience. She should know who this person is going to be. She did. Good for her.


She would have looked foolish if she did not know it...but she did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
45. I was disappointed in her response
I really hope that our head of state can accurately pronounce another head of state's name. Then she blew it off as "whatever". I'm a professional fundraiser and I know how important remembering someone's name can be. As silly as it may sound to some people, this is a part of diplomacy that can make a big difference. It shows how in tune our country is with the culture of someone else we're trying to work with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
46. trumad, you have found the unifying issue for GDP. Russert is a pumpkin-headed fuckstick
Edited on Wed Feb-27-08 03:50 PM by jgraz
What a complete fucking idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
47. This Obama supporter thinks that Russert was out of line last night.
I like them to be harsh, but evenly so. Russert was much harder on Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
casus belli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. Seconded.
Tim Russert is an aggressive gasbag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
50. Not knowing how to pronounce foreign names doesn't help.
Medve-whatever is not acceptable.

I'm not sure Obama knows how to pronounce it either, but it isn't difficult.

Med-vye-dev.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #50
52. It was plain Obama didn't even know the name, pronunciation aside
He declined the question initially (it was offered as a jump ball) and never did say the man's name in his response. (Even after hearing it from Russert.)

Obama was probably just too much of a gentleman to want to show up Hillary by demonstrating his superior grasp of the issue. :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #52
53. Hillary didn't either. She only said "Meh" before Russert prompted her.
Even after hearing it from Meet The Tim, she still didn't pronounce it correctly - or even try to.

But if someone doesn't know the name, I'd rather they not even bother trying to say it than utter "Medeveh-whatever".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC