|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
kpete (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 08:15 AM Original message |
Why didn't Russert quote Farrakhan's "endorsement" of Obama? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 08:17 AM Response to Original message |
1. Who cares what Farrakhan said in his endorsement? It wasn't solicited. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 08:19 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. agreed. Unless we want to get into the Coulter reccomendation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zabet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 08:18 AM Response to Original message |
2. Maybe Timmeh thought he was doing Obama a favor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 08:21 AM Response to Original message |
4. I think Farrakhan purposely stopped short of an official endorsement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
casus belli (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 08:38 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. He most certainly realizes he's baggage... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 08:22 AM Response to Original message |
5. Russert was positively drooling in his desire to quote Farrakhan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
casus belli (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 08:40 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. He was stumbling over himself to get in additional quotes and details... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 08:50 AM Response to Reply #5 |
9. I noticed that as well. The way that Obama stomped on Tim's attempt to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Emit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:13 PM Response to Reply #5 |
13. As are many DUers n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lint Head (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 08:32 AM Response to Original message |
6. Because Russert is a Fat Headed Gas Bag. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 11:51 AM Response to Original message |
10. It is his nature. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NOLALady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 11:57 AM Response to Original message |
11. And that was their best shot at Obama? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:02 PM Response to Original message |
12. it was a wasted question by russert and a wasted 10 minutes of debate time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:15 PM Response to Original message |
14. Because The Quote Itself Wasn't The Point. The Endorsement Was. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:59 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC