Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I don't know about you, but my old tax returns are sitting in a file cabinet

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 01:33 PM
Original message
I don't know about you, but my old tax returns are sitting in a file cabinet
5 feet away and I can get them out to show you in about 23 seconds flat. The rest of my house is an incredible mess, but I do keep track of the important items!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Um
I'm confused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. From the debate last night, when Senator Clinton said something to the effect that
she was working on getting her tax returns released to th e public but that it would take a while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Clinton fumbled around on why her tax returns are unavailable, saying she "hasn't had time"
or that she's "been busy", something to that effect.

really inspired confidence in her as a leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bellasgrams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. I really doubt if she handles her tax returns herself. She probably
means she has to have meetings with her tax people. I know I have a hard time keeping up with my paperwork and only have tiny tiny bit of property, after I post mine on a spreadsheet then take it to a CPA. I can't imagine how complcated it must be for her or anyone with wealth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. but this issue has come up before, and it keeps getting avoided
she doesn't say she won't provide it, simply that now is not the time.

if she does have professional accountants, they could get it for her instantly, or else they're incompetent. Or crooked. Take your pick. My dad was an accountant and did people's taxes. He could put his hand on their records instantly, and that was before computers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Blue Marble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. It is not complicated.
Edited on Wed Feb-27-08 02:05 PM by Big Blue Marble
At one time I worked for a CPA. We had every client's tax return easily available for every year
that we filed for them. It would take us no more than ten minutes to find the file and pull the return.

The return no matter how extensive is a packet stapled together and easily accessible.
It does not matter how wealthy the client. Their packet is just a little larger
It is filed just as it is sent to IRS.

She is stalling, blatantly stalling.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shain from kane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. She knows that she will be grilled on its contents, and may want to have explanations
from the accountants, and weigh the exposure of certain information. It's not a simple W-2 return.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #19
32. Even better: one phone call and her accountant can look for it for her.
Edited on Wed Feb-27-08 03:04 PM by LoZoccolo
She won't lose but five or ten minutes on the campaign trail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. What about your checkbook?
You know...to return money that you shouldn't have taken in the first place? Does it take you a year to find that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. And I'm guessing that those accountants who many have do their taxes, have
them filed away all nice and neat, too. Instantly accessible and all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. you can always xerox them a copy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. They're probably already in pdf form and on a disc. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. that was a lame play on the debate...
I guess it wasn't funny!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Ha! Sorry - It IS funny and clever.
I'm running slow -- will rectify the problem with coffee IMMEDIATELY!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flor de jasmim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. Not only that, but she acts like she personally would have to retrieve/prepare them!
She's been campaigning for a year...they couldn't have "found" her papers as First Lady by now? I can't remember if she has spoken about the need for Open Government (Obama sure has), but I'd have a hard time believing her, if she had.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. She thinks people are stupid enough to believe that crap!
She is largely correct!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ExtraGriz Donating Member (405 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. is there a legal basis?
for her to show her tar returns? in past years, when did candidates publicized their tax returns? or is this all because the obama campaign want her to show her tax return? just curious thats all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Obama has made his public.
Not sure where the original request for her to do so came from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Anti-Bush Donating Member (251 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. It's about transparency
Obama has already released his. What does she have to hide?

The fact is that they have been doing business overseas, and we have a right to know how they are earning their money.

It isn't all from book deals and speeches. You don't SECRETLY lend your campaign $5 million dollars and get to go on unscrutinized.

If she has done nothing wrong, then she has nothing to worry about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
37. It is about demanding voluntary invasion of their privacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlyingSquirrel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. We're simple folk.
When you're a public figure, your tax return may be extremely complex and I'm sure there are plenty of confidential things you want to make sure don't get released if they aren't required to be.

Just a guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Obama is a public figure
and he found the time to release his tax information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlyingSquirrel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Ya you're right... see below
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bellasgrams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. There's absolutely no way to compare tax returns of BO to the
Clintons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlyingSquirrel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Explain?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #12
30. Before or after he paid rezco back the money? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. point being, we know all about Rezko and that there's nothing wrong there. Clintons, otoh
we can't know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. Mine aren't.
But any time I've needed them for a line of credit, I've picked up the phone, called our accountant and asked him to FAX them to the lender.

Takes, like, three minutes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
11. Clinton's been too busy to get that info to the public!
But she promises she will do better with time management as President!



Such an obvious lie. H. Clinton thinks we are as stupid as rocks.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlyingSquirrel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
15. No matter what's in it, she will be criticized. Should've released long ago
Edited on Wed Feb-27-08 01:48 PM by FlyingSquirrel
'cause instead it's festering and makes it look like she has something to hide.

Wow, I just looked at Obama's 2006 return. Neither he nor Michelle checked the box to have $3 go to the Presidential Election Campaign Fund! What do they have against PUBLIC FINANCING????????!?!?111

LOL

I mean really, someone's gonna take issue with anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
17. But she'll have them to us by the end of April.....say the 23rd?? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
23. Why should anyone provide that info before they obtain the nomination?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Because promising to release them after they obtain the nomination suggests
that if we see them ahead of time, they won't get the nomination?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #23
31. She says she's been fully vetted, but won't release her returns?
that action seems to call into question that statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raejeanowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
33. Aren't We Talking About The Currently Due One?
Yeah, it bothers me she hasn't gotten it together, either; maybe she has a slight leeway on the 2007 final edition.

Otherwise, it seemed to come up in the context of-as Russert put it-who was contributing (indirectly) to the $5 million she loaned the campaign. I'm not convinced that legitimate income she loans to her campaign can be seen as a contribution. I'd be more concerned with income that appeared to be inexplicable, i.e., purely a gift.

Final thought to Obama supporters: This Rezko connection hasn't yet had full disclosure in court, so don't get your knickers in a twist about the Clinton tax disclosures just yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #33
39. No, we are talking of her 2006 return. OB released his 2006, HRC has not.
No one has requested her 2007 return - yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
34. I've got mine saved on my computer. Wanna see?
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
36. Great. Why don't you send 'em to me; would you like my address?
In this age of ridicule and simplicity, it's not as simple as that: we're all intertwined and "our" life really isn't "ours". They would--as most people of means and consequence would--have to excise personal information about business associates, details of account numbers, details of confidential information that can get quite complex. Ridiculing them with the claim that you could send yours at the drop of a pointy fool's cap is just plain silly. Are yours as complex as theirs?

Even if they're pretty much innocent, there's going to be stuff in there that'll be waved high like a bloody shirt that they'll then have to go on the defensive about. You made HOW MUCH money for that speech, Bill? Isn't the third assistant secretary of that organization a convicted felon with bad breath and a history of substance abuse?

Nobody likes to have his/her personal financial dealings picked over, and certainly not without restricting some information. Lest we forget, the haters will shriek like the mutilated at anything that's deemed confidential and it'll raise deafening cries of assorted poopiness.

Hey, don't wait for my address; you could aways post them right here and now. Go ahead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marlakay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
38. Ready on Day 1??? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC