|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
RockyTorres (135 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 07:53 PM Original message |
Can anyone from TX give me an unbiased idea of what the polls really look like out there? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bicoastal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 07:54 PM Response to Original message |
1. Why do you say that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeatleBoot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 07:55 PM Response to Original message |
2. Cue your friend from Texas..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RockyTorres (135 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 07:56 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. I just never believe any polls I see on the news or online and like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bicoastal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 08:00 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. Rocky, first-person accounts are simply misleading. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 08:06 PM Response to Reply #9 |
17. Were Obama's votes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RockyTorres (135 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 08:08 PM Original message |
Of course...why wouldn't they have been |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 08:11 PM Response to Original message |
24. Because he zero vote count in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cloud75 (737 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 08:31 PM Response to Reply #3 |
37. I'm from south texas and it's 3-to-1 Clinton from people i talk to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rzemanfl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 07:56 PM Response to Original message |
4. Because? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RockyTorres (135 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 07:57 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. I am just wondering what people are actually hearing out there and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 07:58 PM Response to Original message |
6. It's a dead heat pretty much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 07:59 PM Response to Original message |
7. You have Zero Credibility when you predict a 60-40 win for Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RockyTorres (135 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 08:04 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. I did admit earlier that the 60% was slightly exagerated...She will definetly carry 55% though... :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 08:05 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Momentum is with Obama in TX and the polls show that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 08:06 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. You just asked for our opinion on the polls.... and now you are telling us she'll take 55% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RockyTorres (135 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 08:07 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. I am talking in Texas I want to know....In Ohio she will win 55%...that is a given |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 08:08 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. No, her getting 55% in Ohio is not a given |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RockyTorres (135 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 08:09 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. No response to that I am being serious...watch it and you will see. He is not even leading in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 08:12 PM Response to Reply #22 |
26. Sorry... you're wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RockyTorres (135 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 08:14 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. I said the city of Cleveland was 55% black not the county...Just watch and see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 08:17 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. But when SurveyUSA lists Cleveland, they are also talking about the Greater Cleveland areas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RockyTorres (135 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 08:18 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. Like I said...I will still ove ya next Tuesday, but she will win 55%, and no, look it up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 08:21 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. For the last time, it's not just the city of Cleveland they are including! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RockyTorres (135 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 08:31 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. OMG...I live in the City...I am telling you he is not dominating it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 08:38 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. I will bet you he takes Cuyahoga County by a 60-40 or more margin on Tuesday |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RockyTorres (135 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 08:48 PM Response to Reply #39 |
42. We'll see what happens....In all honesty I will say this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 08:49 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. Fair enough |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 08:08 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. Its a given that shell take 55%? This is why personal opinions are not fact they are biased |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skipos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 08:43 PM Response to Reply #11 |
41. Mark Penn, is that you? Way to move the goal posts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skipos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 07:59 PM Response to Original message |
8. Yay, Ohio MATTERS! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RockyTorres (135 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 08:05 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. Wisconsin is the only one that matters there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 08:06 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skipos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 08:16 PM Response to Reply #12 |
30. No, Wisconsin doesn't matter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 08:00 PM Response to Original message |
10. sorry, but anecdotal "evidence" is far more unreliable than even |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RockyTorres (135 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 08:06 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. definetly do...There are no good polls out of Vermont or RI |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 08:07 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. In VT there are good polls. What are you talking about??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RockyTorres (135 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 08:10 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. I meant I haven't really been able to find any....The most recent one was from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 08:13 PM Response to Reply #23 |
27. Probably cuz your not looking hard enough. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 08:13 PM Response to Reply #23 |
28. No. There wasn't any VT polling at all two weeks ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 08:12 PM Response to Reply #15 |
25. There are polls out of both states- Rasmussen and ARG |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RockyTorres (135 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 08:16 PM Response to Reply #25 |
31. Yea that sounds like a lost cause for her... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 08:29 PM Response to Original message |
35. Just like voter opinion varies from state to state it varies from district to district |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 08:37 PM Response to Original message |
38. I'm amused..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
texas_indy (432 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 08:42 PM Response to Original message |
40. Obama is going to win Texas popular vote and delegates, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knixphan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 09:06 PM Response to Reply #40 |
44. everyone should be so lucky |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loveangelc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 09:22 PM Response to Reply #40 |
45. Do you think he has support through TX or just Dallas? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
texas_indy (432 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 09:35 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. Yep, I bet Dallas, Houston, and Austin will go for him, and he will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loveangelc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 10:40 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. I suspect they are voting for Obama too but I was wondering about the conservative radio talk show |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:18 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC