Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Obama Lying About His Position on NAFTA?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Ugnmoose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 09:53 AM
Original message
Is Obama Lying About His Position on NAFTA?
Edited on Thu Feb-28-08 09:58 AM by Ugnmoose
I find this to be very disturbing because it does get to one core principle - truthfullness

snip

Within the last month, a top staff member for Obama’s campaign telephoned Michael Wilson, Canada’s ambassador to the United States, and warned him that Obama would speak out against NAFTA, according to Canadian sources.

The staff member reassured Wilson that the criticisms would only be campaign rhetoric, and should not be taken at face value.

But Tuesday night in Ohio, where NAFTA is blamed for massive job losses, Obama said he would tell Canada and Mexico “that we will opt out unless we renegotiate the core labour and environmental standards.”

Late Wednesday, a spokesperson for the Obama campaign said the staff member’s warning to Wilson sounded implausible, but did not deny that contact had been made.

You must watch this video from Canadian News Outlet:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LtbLEKHsi0&eurl=http://noquarterusa.net/blog/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Oleladylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. he also is quoted as saying that NAFTA had been good for the country
just as Hillary has....We are better off knowing these things now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. The full article claims that both Clinton and Obama staffers are saying the same thing. Which is
unsurprising; of course they're going to reassure Canada and Mexico that they understand that trade policy is slightly more complex than "OMG NAFTA SUCKS."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. I'm sure your characterization is an innocent one, but the article does not say that
Edited on Thu Feb-28-08 11:56 AM by Kurt_and_Hunter
(Assuming "the article" refers to the Candian online piece accompanying the TV segment)

The factual claim of Obama's campaign telling the Canadian embassy to disregard Obama's comments as political rhetoric is not offset by a comparable claim about the Clinton campaign.

The article makes its claims about Obama unequivocally, and as fact reporting, not speculation.

It then says (from memory) "lower ranking sources suggested... Clinton camp flatly denied..."

So the article takes pains to distance itself from that as factual reporting, while offering the suggestion for balance.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. "criticisms would only be campaign rhetoric"...Change you can Believe in? Huh!
Within the last month, a top staff member for Obama's campaign telephoned Michael Wilson, Canada's ambassador to the United States, and warned him that Obama would speak out against NAFTA, according to Canadian sources.

The staff member reassured Wilson that the criticisms would only be campaign rhetoric, and should not be taken at face value.

But Tuesday night in Ohio, where NAFTA is blamed for massive job losses, Obama said he would tell Canada and Mexico "that we will opt out unless we renegotiate the core labour and environmental standards."

Late Wednesday, a spokesperson for the Obama campaign said the staff member's warning to Wilson sounded implausible, but did not deny that contact had been made.

"Senator Obama does not make promises he doesn't intend to keep," the spokesperson said.

http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20080227/dems_nafta_080227/20080227?hub=TopStories
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. If true it's disturbing -- but there was a suspicious edit in there
Something seems to have been chopped out of that YoU-Tube video. Note where they said the spokesman did not deny it....Then there was a pixilation and interrupted sentence.

It looks like somebody chopped something out of that report -- like perhaps a denial that it was likely or something from the Obama guy.

I dunno. But whoever posted that video has some splainin to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
griffi94 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. i saw this earlier
Edited on Thu Feb-28-08 10:21 AM by griffi94
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
4. As I noted in another thread, I live in upstate New York and haven't
noticed a massive number of American owned factories in Ontario dumping pollution into the air and water while treating workers like shit. Somehow, I don't think free trade with Canada is a threat to American jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
6. "Within the last month"? Is there a disconnect that causes people
to not see the idiocy of that time frame? Obama has been speaking out publicly against NAFTA for years. A story quoting a person from Rove's AEI claiming the somehow Canada needed to be warned this month about something that's been going on for several years is beyond ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. There you have it. I guess daily these stories will have to be
quashed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Obama's campaign confirms that the story is BS!
The sourcing is blind, and I've got a call into the embassy for their take. The Obama campaign is denying it.

"?The news reports on Obama's position on NAFTA are inaccurate and in no way represent Senator Obama?s consistent position on trade," says Obama spokesman Bill Burton. "When Senator Obama says that he will forcefully act to make NAFTA a better deal for American workers, he means it. Both Canada and Mexico should know that, as president, Barack Obama will do what it takes to create and protect American jobs and strengthen the American economy -- that includes amending NAFTA to include labor and environmental standards. We are currently reaching out to the Canadian embassy to correct this inaccuracy."

link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Just heard this story reported on cable news, we will see if it has legs
They said Obama campaign is denying it, no surprise there...hopefully it will be followed up on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
9. I am a one issue voter - the issue is: TRUST
I have emailed the cable news stations the article from the Canadian newspaper

http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20080227/dems_nafta_080227/20080227?hub=TopStories

Thank you for the youtube link as well.

This is not change I can believe in, I feel duped voting for Obama back on Feb 5th, the voters in Ohio and Texas need to know about this and Obama needs to address it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Levgreee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. I sincerely doubt you voted for Obama
It is evident by your rhetoric, and dismissing him on NAFTA before actually researching this news item
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. oh the shine has been wearing off for over a week now
and I have read the article and looking for more info, emailing the cable news to cover it, they have better resources than I do for 'researching'.

Not only did I vote for him, but pitched him to my mom and sister that voted for him as well.

I am having sincere doubts about the man and his rhetoric now.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
10. NO.
"The news reports on Obama's position on NAFTA are inaccurate and in no way represent Senator Obama’s consistent position on trade. When Senator Obama says that he will forcefully act to make NAFTA a better deal for American workers, he means it. Both Canada and Mexico should know that, as president, Barack Obama will do what it takes to create and protect American jobs and strengthen the American economy -- that includes amending NAFTA to include labor and environmental standards. We are currently reaching out to the Canadian embassy to correct this inaccuracy," said Obama spokesman Bill Burton."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Read the WORDS. That is a non-denial of the facts reported
The Obama campaign is not denying that they told the Canadian embassy to disregard his NAFTA comments as political rhetoric. They do not address the factual claim at all!

This statement makes a vague claim about the nature of "Senator Obama’s consistent position on trade," and makes no claims about what his campaign did or did not communicate to Canada.

"The news reports on Obama's position on NAFTA are inaccurate..."

They are saying they disagree in a vague way with an un-specifiable characterization of his policy in "news reports." The "inaccuracy" is unspecified.


Nothing approaching a contradiction of the factual claims about the "political rhetoric" message to the Canadians is offered.



"The news reports on Obama's position on NAFTA are inaccurate and in no way represent Senator Obama’s consistent position on trade. When Senator Obama says that he will forcefully act to make NAFTA a better deal for American workers, he means it. Both Canada and Mexico should know that, as president, Barack Obama will do what it takes to create and protect American jobs and strengthen the American economy -- that includes amending NAFTA to include labor and environmental standards. We are currently reaching out to the Canadian embassy to correct this inaccuracy," said Obama spokesman Bill Burton."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. I suggest you read this thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kennetha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
16. Obama is a two-faced liar
Says one thing to win votes in Ohio. Says another thing in private to a foreign government. New politics my arse. THe guy is an old-style CHicago pol in sheep's clothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debbierlus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
18. They are BOTH corporatists. Man, woman, minority. IT IS THE POLICIES

Not the image that ultimately count....

DU has lost its collective mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC