BeatleBoot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-28-08 12:26 PM
Original message |
David Gergen Confirms Hillary did NOT support NAFTA |
xultar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-28-08 12:28 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I knew it. I've been trying to find proof. I actually saw her say she disagreed with Bill on it |
|
but I couldn't find it.
The Obama supporters will never believe it and will still say she did so what the fuck does it matter?
|
jasmine621
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-28-08 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
11. Here is one link. Will have more. |
blm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-28-08 12:32 PM
Response to Original message |
2. But chose to not HAVE that battle. Chose to NOT OPPOSE Bush's decision to use force in Iraq. |
|
Chose to NOT OPPOSE Bush on ToraBora. Chose to NOT OPPOSE Bush keeping Rumsfeld after Abu Ghraib. Chose to NOT LEAD a filibuster on Alito.
Chose to OPPOSE Kerry on Iraq withdrawal plan, speaking against it on the senate floor in June 2006.
|
NJSecularist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-28-08 12:34 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I can confirm otherwise |
Occam Bandage
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-28-08 12:35 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Wow. A Clintonite defending a Clinton. I guess that settles it. |
elixir
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-28-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
8. Thank you for the words of support. We enjoy supporting each other. Have a nice day. |
emilyg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-28-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
juajen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-28-08 12:37 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Thank you so much for posting this. I missed it last night, |
|
I loved the ad, and I'm grateful for the info on NAFTA. Of course, Hill has to take the bad with the good when it concerns Bill's administration, and this is one of the whoppers. I almost supported Ross Perot because of NAFTA. I'm wondering how it can be changed to reflect the needs of our country instead of the ones its benefiting now. Luckily, a woman with real smarts has a plan to do this, if she's given a chance. Here's hoping.
|
MadBadger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-28-08 12:37 PM
Response to Original message |
6. So what about her claiming it what an achievement and good for America on balance? |
Occam Bandage
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-28-08 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
13. This entire argument is stupid. Nobody really thinks |
|
that Obama or Clinton believe that NAFTA is all good or all bad, or that HRC was completely against it when she was in the WH, or that either of them would treat NAFTA significantly differently when in office. It's all just pandering to Ohio blue-collar workers.
|
scheming daemons
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-28-08 12:38 PM
Response to Original message |
7. So that settles it... Hillary lied in her book |
goldcanyonaz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-28-08 12:39 PM
Response to Original message |
9. He's a LIAR! And, how dare you post anything that contradicts Obama's talking points on here. |
ProSense
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-28-08 12:40 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Breaking: Hillary caught in lie about NAFTA during debate and on video: |
dionysus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-28-08 12:40 PM
Response to Original message |
12. so in the quotes they pulled during the debate where she supported it, |
eleny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-28-08 12:40 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Maybe this is a good reason why we should have access to her papers... |
|
It was reported yesterday that she wanted NAFTA passed after her medical plan It was discussed on MSNBC. She just wanted her med proposal to be passed by Congress first.
I saw Gergen yesterday talking about her reservations about NAFTA. But then later I saw the other discussion.
We need her papers to clarify all this.
|
Occam Bandage
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-28-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
15. If she releases her papers, she won't be able to play the game she currently does: |
|
For all things that happened under Clinton:
1. If they were good, she was for it and helped make it happen. 2. If they were bad, she was secretly and silently against it.
For all things that did not happen under Clinton:
1. If we didn't want them to happen, she was a driving force blocking it from happening. 2. If we wanted it to happen, she was secretly and silently lobbying for it to no avail.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:33 PM
Response to Original message |