Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Canadian Embassy- No Calls From Obama Campaign. CTV Story Based On "Unnamed Sources"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 12:49 PM
Original message
Canadian Embassy- No Calls From Obama Campaign. CTV Story Based On "Unnamed Sources"
Edited on Thu Feb-28-08 12:51 PM by cryingshame
Canadians deny Obama call

A spokesman for the Canadian Embassy to the United States, Tristan Landry, flatly denied the CTV report that a senior Obama aide had told the Canadian ambassador not to take seriously Obama's denunciations of Nafta.

"None of the presidential campaigns have called either the Ambassador or any of the officials here to raise Nafta," Landry said.

He said there had been no conversations at all on the subject.

"We didn't make any calls, they didn't call us," Landry said.

"There is no story as far as we’re concerned," he said.

.........................................................................................................................

ABC News' Jennifer Parker Reports:

A senior Canadian Embassy official in Washington, D.C. disputes a report by the CTV Canadian television network that an Obama campaign staffer telephoned Michael Wilson, Canada's ambassador to the United States, to reassure him that campaign rhetoric against NAFTA should not be taken seriously.

"It didn't happen," said Roy Norton, who heads up the congressional, public and intergovernmental affairs portfolio for the Canadian embassy.

Norton said none of the three campaigns for Sen. Barack Obama, Sen. Hillary Clinton, or Sen. John McCain have contacted the embassy.

"Neither before the Ohio debate nor since has any of the U.S. presidential campaigns called Ambassador Wilson or the Canadian embassy to raise NAFTA," he said.

CTV reported last night that two unnamed Canadian sources said a "senior member" of Obama's campaign team called Wilson in the last month to warn him that Obama would be ratcheting up rhetoric against the North American Free Trade Agreement, but that he should "not be worried about what Obama says about NAFTA" and "Its just campaign rhetoric...Its not serious."

During a debate in Ohio this week, where NAFTA is blamed for job losses, both Obama and Clinton said that as president, they would opt out of the trade deal unless it could be renegotiated.

When asked about the CTV report, Obama's campaign spokesperson said the warning sounded implausible.

"Senator Obama does not make promises he doesn't intend to keep," Obama spokesperson Robert Gibbs told ABC News late Wednesday.

Today Bill Burton of the Obama campaign told ABC News no senior Obama campaign representative called the Canadian embassy. "The news reports on Obama's position on NAFTA are inaccurate and in no way represent Senator Obama’s consistent position on trade," Burton said separately in an email.

"When Senator Obama says that he will forcefully act to make NAFTA a better deal for American workers, he means it. Both Canada and Mexico should know that, as president, Barack Obama will do what it takes to create and protect American jobs and strengthen the American economy -- that includes amending NAFTA to include labor and environmental standards. We are currently reaching out to the Canadian embassy to correct this inaccuracy."

The Canadian embassy is proactively reaching out to the campaigns "all the time," Norton said, to try to meet with aides who might form the foreign and economic policy teams of any future administration.

"We talk about the whole range of Canada-U.S. issues which we think it's critically important that the presidential candidates be aware of including the number of jobs that depend in the United States on Canada-U.S. trade."

The Canadian Embassy says there are more than seven million jobs in the U.S. that depend on trade with Canada.

"We discuss our view that NAFTA has been very good for all three participating countries and has made the continent more competitive in the face of China, India, Brazil," Norton said.

The CTV report suggested the Clinton campaign may have given reassurances to the Canadian government in Ottawa, but the Clinton campaign is flatly denying the claim.

NAFTA has become a hot-button issue in the delegate-rich state of Ohio, which votes next Tuesday. Both Clinton and Obama have tried to woo voters in the economically challenged state by railing against NAFTA, which was pushed through during former President Bill Clinton's administration.

McCain, however, said today that he plans to highlight his support for the trade deal to draw contrasts between him and his Democratic opponent.

"NAFTA has created jobs," McCain said today while campaigning in Texas, arguing that the trade deal has been good for the American, Canadian, and Mexican economies.

"Anyone who studies history understands that every time this country or other nations in the world have practiced protectionism, they’ve paid a very, very heavy price for it," McCain said, adding that "some would argue that one of the major contributors to World War II was the Smoot-Hawley tariffs acts."
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/02/canadian-embass.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kick for you
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alhena Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good news
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. That swift-boating story should never have been featured on DU's Home Page to begin with.
There were far too many bogus aspects to the whole thing. Unnamed sources, claim that it happened a month ago, the obvious fact that neither Obama nor Clinton would have any need to or gain any advantage from taking such action during this primary fight (also, the headline didn't reflect that the story itself also included a claim that Clinton's campaign had done the same thing).


Doubtless there will be lots of these swift boat, spectacular "stories" floated between now and November against whomever is the Dem candidate. I hope DU will not give in to the need to be the first blog to break some story, i.e, feature it prominently on the front page, especially with damning headlines. Posting something in Latest Breaking News category is effective enough so that we are timely informed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Exactly. It's gone now, but that was ridiculous that it was there in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. kicked and recommended. this should be on front page as a correction n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. Thank you, another lame ass attempt at swiftboating a Dem candidate
Edited on Thu Feb-28-08 01:26 PM by 48percenter
I'm going to bring it up, people won't like it, but doesn't Bill have a really good Canadian friend named Belinda Stronach?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. That "friendship" is so last year. She's moved on to some sports star.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. perhaps
the big dawg is having some electile dysfunction?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Delete/dupe
Edited on Thu Feb-28-08 01:51 PM by Divernan
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContinentalOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. What frightens me is how many DUers eagerly jumped on this story and took it at face value
even though it was patently absurd and illogical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. in all fairness, both Hillary and Obama supporters tend to do this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyorDeath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. I knew it,

What a bunch of despicable shit weasels.

Rec!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. Probably the same "unnamed source" who produced that photo. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. Nice to hear you say that the Clinton camp did not produce the photo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
13. McCain is also accusing Obama of double talk on Iraq
McCain is commenting on a story against Obama in which the source relies on unnamed sources, and the two sides involved, deny anything every happened. Sound familiar John? You fucking hypocrite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
16. k and r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
17. K & R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
18. apparently some haven't seen this yeat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC