Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why is the Democratic Party so stupid?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Onlooker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 07:39 AM
Original message
Why is the Democratic Party so stupid?
First they screw up with two key swing states, Florida and Michigan. Now, I learn, they're having their convention first. I just don't get why the Dems can be so dumb. If I'm McCain, I keep my VP secret until after the Dem choice has been announced.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Republican_National_Convention

The RNC National Convention will be held four days after the conclusion of the Democratic National Convention which will be held in Denver, Colorado at the Pepsi Center.

This is the latest any major party convention has ever been convened,and the first one to take place entirely in September. Traditionally, the party who holds the White House has its convention second: the challenging party holds their convention usually in July while the incumbent party holds theirs in August. However, the Democrats wanted to schedule their convention after the 2008 Summer Olympics ended, and the Republicans wanted to keep the political and financial advantages of going second.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. MI and FL are the faults of the local parties.
And the reason there are problems is that they refuse to accept the authority of the DNC. Probably because they oppose the politics of the DNC's leader Howard Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freida5 Donating Member (649 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. The problem was created by poor planning and overreaction by DNC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. No. They did lots of good planning with all the states in setting up a calender.
MI and FL decided to say "fuck that" and went ahead of turn. The DNC's reaction was appropriate. Read up on what Madfloridian posts on this issue. All the facts are there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Not true at all
The incumbent party goes second.

Any earlier and our convention would bump up against the Olympics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Terry McAuliffe set that rule up when he was chair. DNC voted to KEEP the rule.
Were you fine with that rule when McAuliffe put it in play?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. No. They did good, meticulous planning. The state parties then fucked everyone else over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. McCain will name his VP choice long before the Convention
He'll need to in order to get certain elements of the party behind him. Furthermore the conventions are much closer together than 4 years ago. 4 days is really insignificant unless one is superstitious. And none of this indicates stupidity on the part of the dem party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. Because the incumbent party gets to choose last. The Democrats chose a late date this time.
and avoided the problem that McAuliffe created in 04 by choosing an early convention, but the Republicans were able to choose a later date.

At least, Dean was wise enough not to let them have a full month.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. It's not that they choose last; they GO last
The incumbent party always holds its convention after the other one.

And the Olympics are in August and that really had an impact on our choice of a date.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
7. Florida and Michigan broke the DNC rules, not the Dem Party.
They both jumped the gun/date; after the new primary rules were established.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Florida22ndDistrict Donating Member (255 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. RE: Florida and Michigan broke the DNC rules, not the Dem Party.
That's why you punish millions of voters rather then the people who made the decision. I guess the next time a kid shoots up a school we should round up all the kids in his state and collectively punish them for the one kids actions. Maybe we can round up all minorities and collectively punish them too the next time one happens to commit a crime. Collective punishment, for someone else's actions is unjust, and in the matters of elections is definitely undemocratic. Its odd to watch members of a party famous for fighting for civil rights who call themselves the Democratic party perpetuate such a bullshit argument for disenfranchising millions of people. You should be ashamed of yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. If you don't like that, take it up with the state party that made that decision for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Florida22ndDistrict Donating Member (255 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. RE: If you don't like that, take it up with the state party that made that decision for you.
Echo echo echo... You love to shovel out that line don't you. I have a question for you: who sanctioned the states? The DNC sanctioned the states. They handed out the collective punishment that was inflicted on the voters, and they are the only ones that hold responsibility for their actions. The DNC should have been smart enough not to sanction the voters.

The few democratic representatives that exist in my state (not from my district), should have been dealt with by the DNC, if it was such a problem. I guess New Hampshire's silver spoon is more important then banning electronic voting machines and require a paper trail so that we can have clean elections from now on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. And the states were informed that the sanctions would occur, and went ahead anyway.
Edited on Fri Feb-29-08 01:22 PM by Occam Bandage
Every state approved both the timeline and the sanction rules, including FL and MI. Representation from every state party but MI and FL voted to approve enforcement of the rules. It is not the DNC's fault that your state party chose to strip itself of delegates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. Michigan and Florida broke the rules....get mad at your party leaders in your state.
Edited on Fri Feb-29-08 05:16 PM by Breeze54
Levin sent me an e-mail about this and he said something to the effect that
they did it in 'protest' of the primary date rules and they hope to have it
resolved for the next election. I didn't say I agreed with it and I think it's
stupid those two states pulled this stunt in such a critical election year.

I feel for you and the rest of the country over this....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
11. You no hungry for electoral victory! You hungry for hot pockets!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
12. Incumbent party ALWAYS GOES LAST. Please do some basic research before you complain
about even the most simple facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. His two reasons the Dems are stupid are both actually examples of his own ignorance.
I love it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
16. MCain/Feingold forces that
Edited on Fri Feb-29-08 11:50 AM by karynnj
At the time the date was set, there was no thought that the nominee would definitely opt out of public financing. In 2004, Kerry had to stretch his $75 for 13 weeks, while Bush had to stretch his over 8 weeks. During the 5 weeks between the conventions, Bush could continue to use unlimited primary money. This was an enormous dilemma when the SBVT struck then - had Kerry spent a lot of money, he would have been less competitive in the final stretch of the campaign. He would now be blasted on Democratic boards for vainly wasting money on a issue people would have seen through.

As it is, the experience of 2004 and Obama's ability to raise money may preclude taking federal financing. We need more money as their echo chamber helps them for free. However, the date is already set.

On MI and FL, the Democrats really should have negotiated this better - even the Republican giving half the delegates would have led to reasonable primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC