Mass
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-29-08 07:43 AM
Original message |
Ready to govern from day 1? Really? I am not that sure. |
|
Edited on Fri Feb-29-08 07:50 AM by Mass
Yes, it concerns Hillary Clinton who has claimed from months now that she is ready to govern from day 1.
From the primary campaign, can we really believe this? She had all the advantages: name recognition, the inevitability aura, tons of money. She could have assembled a team of the best among the best and have a strategy where she would have won the race in January.
She squandered all that by not adopting a strategy that worked, losing Iowa, not winning Super Tuesday, and not having a strategy beyond that. Now, she is claiming she did not understand the rules about the Texas election and wants to contest them in a court of law.
Are you sure this is who you want as a president? Somebody who cannot plan a plan B? Somebody who is so arrogant that she cannot see that events can not go the way she wants and plan for an alternative strategy? Somebody who cannot be bothered understanding the rules?
Sorry, this is not what I want. And this latest episode in Texas convinces me that she would be a poor president.
|
cali
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-29-08 07:46 AM
Response to Original message |
1. It's like groundhog day everyday around here |
|
We just keep recycling the same stuff. Can't wait until this is over.
|
JVS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-29-08 07:49 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Ready to delegitimize the nomination process from day one. |
|
There is a lot of work to be done cleaning up Hillary's trashing of the whole process. We'd better win this year because we'll need 8 years to put this humpty dumpty situation back together again.
|
dkf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-29-08 07:53 AM
Response to Original message |
3. I'm thinking she is contesting the rules simply because |
|
she feels it is unfavorable to her, rather narcissistic if you ask me. Rules for thee, not for me.
Doesn't matter if she can plan or not on this one.
|
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-29-08 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. Same as it ever was. nt |
MyNameGoesHere
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-29-08 08:26 AM
Response to Original message |
5. So you prefer "Ready to bomb pakistan from day one"? |
|
Obama has the same thinking of our current cowboy diplomat.
|
Mass
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-29-08 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. Not what he said, but at least if somebody was going to do that, I would like somebody able to plan |
|
the consequences.
Apparently, Clinton never foresaw the consequences of voting for the IWR either. Not that smart.
|
MyNameGoesHere
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-29-08 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
9. i do not want EITHER DEMOCOCRATIC candidate |
|
threatening to unilaterally use military action in a sovereign nation. THAT is what we have now. And yes he did say he would take military action against AQ in Pakistan if they were a threat blah blah blah. More cowboy diplomacy.
|
Medusa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-29-08 08:27 AM
Response to Original message |
7. Wanda Sykes the comedian had a great line on the Tonight show |
|
about what "Ready on Day 1" really meant: She already knows where the bathrooms are in the White House.
|
hobbit709
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-29-08 08:33 AM
Response to Original message |
8. There's NO ONE ready to govern on day 1 |
|
Despite claims to the contrary by all the candidates on both sides, unless they're the reincarnation of Grover Cleveland, there is going to be a learning curve.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:03 PM
Response to Original message |