Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Unreal! Hillary *herself* coached her precinct captains this morning ... link

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Alhena Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 11:15 PM
Original message
Unreal! Hillary *herself* coached her precinct captains this morning ... link
Here goes any plausible deniability- the infamous memo was passed out at a caucus coaching session in which Hillary herself was the head coach.

http://www.suntimes.com/news/elections/821114,clinton030208.article

On Saturday morning, Clinton told 200 precinct captains in San Antonio they needed to seize control of the election-night caucuses.

“We’ve got to do the Texas two-step,” Clinton told them. Texas’ unusual hybrid primary election offers voters two chances to vote for their candidate: In the morning at the polls and then in the evening at caucuses in every precinct.

....

To that end, Clinton backers passed out flyers urging precinct captains to request the “envelope” full of materials at the caucus that will allow them to serve as temporary chair of the caucus.

“If there is no envelope, take out your own materials and announce the start of the convention,” the instructions say. “Possession of the envelope allows you to serve as temporary chair and control the start of the precinct convention.”

Clinton, her voice growing hoarse, urged the precinct captains to recruit their friends.

“There are 8,000 sites for these conventions and we want to be represented for each and every one of them,” she said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's great. Shows incredible commitment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Probably as a way to call for the doors to be locked
so Obama supporters cannot caucus, just as she did in Nevada.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Garbage.
Heresay and garbage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #12
32. It's right there in the article linked in the OP.
'On Saturday morning, Clinton told 200 precinct captains in San Antonio they needed to seize control of the election-night caucuses.'

What does 'seize control' mean to you?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #32
42. It means Hillary is enlisting the assistance of the Flying Spaghetti Monster



Seriously, you are one of the most ridiculous :tinfoilhat: on the DU. Give reality a try someday, chief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #42
48. I'll take that as a compliment. Thanks!
So, how does losing feel?

Like it's 11 in a row.

Seriously, how does that make you feel?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 12:55 AM
Original message
How do I feel?
Kinda put off that the weaker, inexperienced candidate has managed to capitalize on fear & empty promises, and duped just enough lemmings to follow him off the cliff.

But hey, thanks for asking big guy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
63. Don't worry, it'll be all over in three days.
Obama has more legislative experience than Hillary, has beaten her campaign senseless in a race that was hers to lose, and has the superior plan if you read them both. Sometimes the best candidate wins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #63
65. Your really do believe the kool-aid you sip, eh?
Incredible.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #65
70. Do you have to attack posters just because they don't love your candidate?
What's the matter with you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #70
73. You've got to be fucking kidding me, hypocrite
Edited on Sun Mar-02-08 01:58 AM by Tarc
The likes of you lecturing others for attack posts is like receiving a lecture from bin laden on civil rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 02:07 AM
Response to Reply #73
81. 2nd that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andromeda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:39 AM
Response to Reply #81
91. Good one, Tarc....
I'll 3rd that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #73
82. I feel sorry for you. All you have is attacking other posters. I don't like your candidate, but I
have nothing against you except your disregard for DU rules, and your idea that attacking those who don't agree with your choice of a candidate is somehow acceptible.

Shame on you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #82
98. Hey Mr. Pot, meet my good friend Mr. Kettle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #98
99. If you believe an idiomatic expression absolves you of the responsibility of acting civilly,
Edited on Sun Mar-02-08 12:23 PM by John Q. Citizen
then, again, I feel sorry for you.

'But Dad, everybody else was doing it' no more absolves the bad behavior of my kid than does your pot/kettle phrase absolve you of behaving poorly.

Maybe you were raised in a family that taught you that name calling is acceptable behavior?

I don't know. If so, I feel sorry for you.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 04:13 AM
Response to Reply #65
92. Talk to me then. Not now.
I will check on you after the concession speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mahina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 02:59 AM
Response to Original message
87. I still don't really follow how you can say that Obama is inexperienced in comparison w Hillary.
He was elected to two terms as Illinois state Senator before he was elected to the US Senate. Hillary is in her eighth year in the US Senate, having served one term plus two years, roughly.

? Do you count the years she was married to the President? By that logic, and I mean this sincerely, Laura Bush is qualified to be the President. How can she claim Bill's experience as her own?

As a woman, this argument seems anti-feminist to me. But more than that, it is illogical.

Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:14 AM
Response to Reply #87
97. Well it's a mixed bag of:
lies, tomfoolery, denial, and good old fashioned groupthink.

See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Penn

:hide:

:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #32
46. someone has to be in control, right?
if the rules say you can start at eight, say, then starting at eight is just following the procedures. Sure, you could wait until nine, but you aren't cheating if you don't, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #46
50. Do you imagine "seizing control" of the caucuses is in the rules? That would be stupid.
And it could lead to violence.

The caucuses are set up and run by the Texas Democratic Party.

I hope they eject anyone who attempts to "seize control" of the process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #50
74. You would think that would be the case
But Hillary supporters did just that in Nevada.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texastoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. That ain't happening
and if it does, the precinct's input can be challenged if someone brings it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #8
77. "only one purpose in trying to control the tally of votes"
Over at the Burnt Orange Report:

The phrase, "if our supporters are outnumbered," means, in simpler language, "If we lose the vote, take control of the vote tally and change the numbers."

Place this alongside the Clinton campaign threats to challenge the Texas caucuses and you get a full picture of what Clinton is up to: disrupt the caucuses at all costs. Steal votes, delay the reporting of honest vote totals, throw the process into chaos, do whatever it takes.

more here at the Burnt Orange Report
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omega3 Donating Member (412 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. the Audacity of Hard Work
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texastoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. Who are "precinct captains"?
Edited on Sat Mar-01-08 11:24 PM by texastoast
Some of her folks?

There is actually an election process for the permanent precinct convention chair. Unless there is low attendance, that won't mean much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 04:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
93. In our state caucus (NV) the party has precinct captains
but, when caucus day started, it was obvious that both Hillary and Obama campaigns had their own precinct captains. I had occasions to talk with many of these captains and volunteers throughout the day. It seemed, too, that when they got there, they thought they'd be having a say in running the meeting. The chair of our meeting did a great job of thwarting this right from the beginning. He's a union guy, and had a lot of experience, and I, as co-chair, had been my District's volunteer coordinator for years, so we both were confident in our roles. If a lesser experienced caucus chair had been there, I could see how they may have been intimidated.

It is possible, of course, that a particular candidate's captain can also be a party precinct captain or even chair. But, I would hope they would find it within themselves to remain unbiased when running a caucus.

Lastly, if Texas, with it's increase in voter participation, turns out like NV, there will be less party volunteers than is needed to run these caucuses. It will be a mess, ripe for problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. I am having flashbacks of doors closed early in Nevada...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
36. drink some cold water, put your head down--I will give you pillow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #36
53. Now THAT was funny
Nice! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #36
78. while you snuff out democracy. Yep I get it. Do anything, say anything,
Its the Do Anything Hillary this week.

Gee, where have we seen those tactics before?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. Woot Woot! Go Hil. K/R
Thanks for demonstrating her awesome leadership abilities by posting this article!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thevoiceofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. Won't work in Harris County
Edited on Sat Mar-01-08 11:23 PM by thevoiceofreason
Our election judges are instructed to hand them out only to precinct chairs in the 7 - 7:15 time frame. No one else. If the precinct chair does not show up, then the packet will be given to anyone else who requets it. Regardless, this will not control anything because the temporary chair does not control the "accredidation" of participants -- the permanent chair does.

AND ALSO: NEWS FLASH: ANYONE WHO STATES POSITIVELY THAT THEY VOTED DEMOCRATIC IN THAT PRECINCT CAN PARTICIPATE. PERIOD. AND, IT IS UNLAWFUL TO LOCK DOORS. THE PERMANENT CHAIR WILL ANNOUNCE THAT THE REGISTRATION IS CLOSED FOR CANDIDATE PREFERENCE -- AND THAT IS FINAL UNLESS CHALLENGED APPROPRIATELY AND IMMEDIATELY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoof Hearted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. Good for her! What a worker she is!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
10. Sounds friendly
:sarcasm:

I'd like to think we're all Democrats, but it seems the Clinton campaign enjoys driving people apart. Just like Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
11. I suspect if they are in control
they can also decide not to move the caucus to a larger area if turnout is too large for the room although the rules state the officials can do it if they feel it's necessary.

That would be a way to lock out voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Is locking out voters kinda sorta the same as not having every
vote count? Shades of Florida!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #14
28. It's the same in that Clinton will gladly cheat to win, if she can get away with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #28
34. We know Obama will do anything to win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 12:19 AM
Original message
If by anything you mean motivate voters, well yes. Who is the "we" that you speak for?
Are you a spokesperson for some group?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
41. sure am guess who
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #41
43. Why the mystery? Who are you a spokesperson for? Who do you represent?
And in what capacity?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #43
59. boooooo. its a mystery
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #59
71. I find people who use "we" who aren't official representative of a group annoying.
It's a pet peeve of mine, I guess.

It seems they can't take responsibility for their opinion without attempting to make it sound as if they represent somebody else with that opinion.

On the other hand, if someone does represent a group and that statement or opinion is the official position of the group, that doesn't annoy me. That's why I asked.

Apparently you represent no one except yourself, which is fine. So why try to project the illusion that you are speaking for others?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #34
83. Like, for example...

1. File a lawsuit to disenfranchise union voters after the union endorses your opponent.

2. Leave your name on the ballot in the two states that are barred from seating delegates.

3. Close the doors and lock out caucus goers because YOUR supporters are in the building early.

4. Threaten to sue Texas because you now disagree with the primary rules for the state.

5. Attempt to seat delegations from the states that were previously barred because they violated DNC rules.


You mean like THOSE types of tactics?

Right, there are so many of them on the Obama side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #14
80. yep, its Repug tactics
if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thevoiceofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Or, even worse, decide to move the convention
And improperly notify late arrivers of where it is moving to, or fail to give them enough time to get to the new place, or, as in my case, move it from the retirement center where it is located (and where the whole bunch of elderly can participate) to a remote location.

Be vigilant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #15
56. YOU give her too much power. Get a grip
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zachstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
16. Geez here we go again.
And the usual suspects already on this topic supporting Clinton.

Of course it does not bother you what has been revealed about this crap today does it clinton supporters! I guess there is no need to care when it is getting Clinton in at the cost of the democratic party.

Texans do not like to be treated this way Clinton. The only thing you will seize control of is more batshit crazy folks that sadly support your race. The good Clinton supporters are suffering thanks to them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
17. So BO has a volunteer give the instructions...
Edited on Sat Mar-01-08 11:43 PM by femrap
I would have been psyched if HRC was giving hands-on instructions to volunteers.

Your post shows how absolutely oblivious you are to the political system. OBLIVIOUS AND COMPLETELY NAIVE.

You wouldn't want BO instructing you...??? Or is he too kingly to dirty his hands dealing with Precinct Captains?

This should be a DUZY...how do I nominate this???? Duzy of Ditz!

edit for spell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
18. Hillary is determined she'll get it by "hook
or by crook" but all she is going to do is doom the Democratic Party and this country. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Obama will do anything to win.--being divisive is his trade mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bellasgrams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #18
51. Oh I'm sure if Hillary does good the BO crowd will cry foul
regardless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
19. More Dirty Tricks from the campaign that has little else to offer but that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #19
27. Obama is the oneinto Dirty politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
20. Good for here. Thanks Hillary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. do you ever even read what you have just typed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. I am surprized you can read. I recall your crashing bus pic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #24
30. That pic is hilarious. Hillary did vote to drive the bus into the ditch, after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #30
33. Even the MATURE obamafolks were digusted with it. It got locked
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #33
52. It got locked because idiots like you cannot handle any criticism of Hillary and Alert on any post
Try reading the First Amendment some time. You'll be blown away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #52
60. it got locked because it mocked a bus crash. and your fellow obamafolk alerted also
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #60
79. it got locked because it mocked Hillary and you and others just can't handle that
I'll be happy when Tuesday has come and gone, and Hillary is just a faded memory.

I'm ready to get to the business of changing this Country with our next President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #30
38. can you edit that bus picture to put the destination "Iraq"?
I'd love to see it!

Thats great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #38
62. sure-----lets have him make a fool of himself again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #62
72. There' that royal "we" again. It's annoying. Do you have to pretend to represent others?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #72
76. we represent all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
23. Jesus. Is she trying to set up disenfranchisement?
I don't trust her at all.

I hope Obama is informing his people of how awful Clinton is going to make this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. Like Obama is doing to ME and FL voters?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #25
29. That was a DNC decision in conjuction with the states own
bullheadedness.

Unless you think Obama plotted that all out from the beginning. Ludicrous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindMatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #25
31. What does Maine have to do with this?
And what is Obama "doing" to Florida voters?

If you are referring to the Party disqualifying the Florida delegates, Obama had nothing to do with that. He simply played by the rules established by the Party.

It is sad, but not very surprising, to see the Clinton campaign show such low regard for a fair contest held according to the letter AND SPIRIT of the rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #25
84. I live in ME
and I'm an Obama delegate. My vote is just fine. When the Democratic State Committee was voting on the DNC rules, many of us wanted to change the 15% rule. After a long discussion we decided that since it meant that we risked not being seated, we voted instead for rules that while challenging the 15% cut off, said that we would abide with what the party put out. Thus, we held our primary at an appropriate date with the same rules that govern all of the state parties.

This went on in every state, and before final ratification were posted on their websites. It is unfortunate that FL and MI didn't debate this with an open mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. yes, it is a grand conspiracy
among 8000 different precincts to actually get people to go to the caucus knowing the rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #26
40. If you know the rules and use them to disenfranchise people that is not good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #40
44. if you are following the rules
then it isn't disenfranchisement, is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #44
49. It could be.
In the example above, lets say that the place is full, so according to the caucus rules, you could move the caucus to accommodate more voters, but you also know you don't have to. So you could deliberately keep the location as is in order to keep attendance down.

I'd say that is willful voter disenfranchisement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #49
58. no it isn't
it may be a bad rule, but it is the rule that the precinct captain decides.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #58
68. Yes, so the precinct captain can deliberately keep attendance down
If you feel better thinking that is not disenfranchisement, more power to you.

I call em as I see em.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:37 AM
Response to Reply #68
90. so be a precinct captain
and keep them open. Or work to change the rules. Caucuses by their very nature disenfranchise people. Are you flying to Texas to provide child care for a single parent so he/she can go? What about someone working the night shift? In a nursing home? Away at college or a business trip? A soldier posted to Afghanistan? An agoraphobe? All those people, and many more are already disenfranchised by the system, guaranteed. And you are stressed about possible issues?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat_nanny Donating Member (122 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #23
75. Almost as awful as...
Bob Creamer and all his Obama minions made my precinct caucus where I had to wrestle the envelop away from some clueless child whose only knowledge of the caucus process was the "Obama Precinct Captain" sign around his neck? Gezus. If that guy had stayed in charge we'd still be in that high school gym a month later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 02:26 AM
Response to Reply #75
86. FIGHT!
So after the grab fight over the envelope did you have to punch him or anything? Or did a shove suffice?

:popcorn:

Guess you made his first caucus a memorable one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat_nanny Donating Member (122 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #86
88. Cut the drama
Clearly I didn't really wrestle him. Jesus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:22 AM
Response to Reply #88
89. The "drama" is in the word "wrestle".
Just using your own terminology.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat_nanny Donating Member (122 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 04:23 AM
Response to Reply #89
94. Fine
You win.

You all win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LadyVT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
35. Good job! Go Hillary!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
37. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Alhena Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #37
45. I'm not sensing a lot of love here, Beausoir
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apocalypsehow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #37
47. Another HRC supporter who's all class. Typical.
n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
39. she's plagiarizing the GOPs voter supression plan
Sheesh.

I figured the Texas and Ohio elections to be 2 of the most vulnerable to this crap.

She won't get away with that shit in North Carolina, if this damn thing goes on that long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:36 AM
Response to Reply #39
69. Count on Clinton
to go first for the dirty tricks. Sheesh a week ago she didn't know what the deal was, now she's telling her stooge's how to cheat. Sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
54. Why do you mock her for doing this. SHAME ON YOU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthernSpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #54
100. Because she's a cheater. Now, EAT YOUR PEAS.
:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
55. "Seize control" is precisely what I'm afraid the Clintons will try to do, circa 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #55
57. another paranoid obamakiddo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #57
61. No, we've just seen what ClintonCo is prepared to do to win.
She learned from the master:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #61
64. and Obama has learned from hillary--he says I agree with Hillary lots now.
She learned from the master:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #64
67. And when he's president, she'll go back to the Senate and learn some more.
Maybe she'll learn to support the Democratic Party for a change rather than her own self-interests in cahoots with the BFEE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #67
85. your crystal ball still has a big crack in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 05:33 AM
Response to Reply #85
96. so will your raison d'etre in about three days
for you:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
milkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
66. Why doesn't she try winning by getting more votes for a change?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 04:25 AM
Response to Reply #66
95. That's more difficult......
and takes some skills!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC