Panchojackson
(12 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-01-08 11:17 PM
Original message |
The difference between Krugman, and the twins Dowd and Rich: predictability |
|
Edited on Sat Mar-01-08 11:19 PM by Panchojackson
Difference between Krugman, Rich and Dowd.
Predictability.
You never know if Krugman's next piece will be about ethanol, inflation, criticism against Barack Obama, etc.
But if there ever were two predictable fellows, their names are Maureen Dowd and Frank Rich.
Take Rich, for example. Today he pretends he wanted to bash John McCain, but he can't let go of his obsession against Hillary; so what does he do? Compares McCain with Hillary. Problem solved. Dilemma gone. To be honest, I don't remember the last time that Dowd and Rich spoke about something other than Hillary Clinton.
And I don't even have to go into details about Mauron, because when you define one of them, you define both.
|
JimGinPA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-01-08 11:19 PM
Response to Original message |
BeyondGeography
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-01-08 11:21 PM
Response to Original message |
2. At least Rich didn't include any compromising pictures of Hillary and McCain |
Panchojackson
(12 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-01-08 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Wow, a smile. How compromising! n/t |
BeyondGeography
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-01-08 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. And her little red phone ad just happens to be a re-make of a McCain ad |
Johnny__Motown
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-01-08 11:24 PM
Response to Original message |
4. But Ethanol and inflation will still be here next month. Hillary will not be news anymore very soon |
|
Got to get those by lines in while they can.
|
Larkspur
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-01-08 11:50 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Maureen Dowd was a GOP strategist in 2000 |
|
and in 2004, I believe too.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:56 AM
Response to Original message |