Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Eleanor Clift explains her vote against Hillary

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 11:45 AM
Original message
Eleanor Clift explains her vote against Hillary
From a Q&A in today's NYT magazine:

Whom are you supporting for president?
I don’t want to say, because I don’t want to alienate one or the other. I would take either of the Democrats.

But as a feminist who wrote a book with your late husband about the prospect of a “Madam President”
— How can I not vote for Hillary Clinton?

Yes.
Hillary called me the day after (my husband) Tom died, and her first words were, “Oh, Eleanor, oh, oh, oh.” Six weeks go by, and I get a call from her scheduler. They set up lunch, and it was just the two of us. She has a well-deserved reputation for being loyal to people and remembering birthdays and illnesses and all of that.

And after that, you still didn’t vote for her?
I vote in the District of Columbia, and I agonized over the vote. President Clinton, in the lead-up to the South Carolina primary, wanted to make it hard for Democrats to vote against his wife. Instead, by seeming to inject race, he made it easy. That’s all I am going to say.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/02/magazine/02wwln-Q4-t.html?_r=1&ref=magazine&oref=slogin

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Spiffarino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. I was an Edwards guy
I though long and hard about whom to vote for if Edwards dropped out. After the Clintons' miserable miscalculation in South Carolina, that iced it for me.

No, I don't think it was "racist" in the sense that it was hatefully aimed against black people. But what it did was make race a factor in the Clinton strategy, and that made me very uncomfortable. When I looked at Barack Obama I didn't see a "black" man; I saw a person with great gifts vying to become President, exactly the same as I viewed Hillary Clinton. Other than the historic precedents set by both candidates, race never entered into the discussion among fellow Democrats until Bill brought up the "Jesse Jackson" comment.

Bill is no fool. Indeed, he has been one of the most brilliant political minds of the last fifty years. He knows Jesse Jackson is a dog whistle to certain segments of the Democratic Party. I suspect he was aiming his comment at the "lunch box" Democrats in the upcoming primaries to whom Jesse Jackson is, let's say, less than beloved. As a tactic, it was downright disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
writes3000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thank you, thank you, thank you.
You have nailed this perfectly.

This is exactly when I felt Bill Clinton went too far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spiffarino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. It really hurt, because I liked Bill as a President
As a person he seemed a bit out of control, but as a leader there have been few better in our nation's history in terms of getting things done. Jefferson; Monroe; Polk; Jackson; Lincoln; TR; Wilson; FDR; Kennedy; Johnson; Reagan and Clinton: The things they accomplished certainly weren't always for the good, but they all had the skill and force of personality to drive public policy and achieve their goals.

We've had very few leaders like these among the forty-three Presidents. To now see Bill Clinton act like a typical campaign bomb-thrower lowers my opinion of him enough to consider taking him off the list. I suspect I'm not alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
27. I am sure it hurt Bill to be called a racist. And Hillary, too.
The first I heard it was when Bill was explaining that Obama spoke against war with Iraq, but when he announced for Senate he removed that speech from his website, then he correctly recalled how Obama had said he probably would have voted for the IWR when he was campaigning for Kerry, then how Obama has consistently voted to fund the war. He called Obama's supposed virulent anti-war stance a "fairy tale", which the Obama camp morphed into saying that Obama's run for presidency was a "fairy tale" and that Bill Clinton was a racist for believing a black man could not win the presidency.

The second thing I heard was Hillary talking about the importance of having the right people in the president's office at the right time, and used the example of LBJ being in there to pass the civil rights act. This pissed off some of the Kennedys who thought JFK should get the credit, and was called racist by people who said MLK was slighted. I don't think either were slighted if you look at the point she was making about the holder of the office of the presidency when legislation is passed.

I did hear about the Jesse Jackson comments, and I thought they were because Bill and Hillary felt that they had been stabbed in the back. I thought that was beneath him, but understandable after being called racist based on spin and lies.

I was an Edwards supporter, too, at the time, and while we were mostly getting attacked by Hillary supporters here, I felt a genuine sadness for the Clintons over the way their positions were morphed so they could be called racists.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spiffarino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. The "Fairy tale" comment didn't mean anything
That was a red herring. Anybody who paid even scant attention to what Bill said knew it wasn't about Obama's dream of becoming President. It was Bill framing Obama's Iraq War positions.

No, the ONLY comment I took offense to was the "Jesse Jackson won South Carolina, too" comment which was either blatantly race-based or alarmingly tone-deaf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. I don't think he met anything racist either about the fairy tale comment...
but it was when the slide began because people heard "Obama's campaign is a fairy tale" after it was repeated. I am sure after it got repeated enough and elaborated on, it did sound like he made a racist remark. That is when the numbers started rapidly moving though. I think the JJ comment was actually the day after the SC primary, that is when I heard it, but he may have been repeating it over several days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spiffarino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. The Jackson comment was after the SC primary
Edited on Mon Mar-03-08 12:19 AM by Spiffarino
The "fairy tale" remarks were well ahead of the primary and they definitely DID have an impact on the SC primary. The MSM took Clinton's remarks out of context at every opportunity - which they always do - and it hurt HRC. I understand that completely. Anybody who paid attention would have understood what Bill was talking about. Sad fact is, most people don't pay much attention and let Charlie, Wolf or (ack!) Bill-O spin it for them.

I got turned around after the primary, when Bill brought up Jackson's win. That was the comment that bothered me; the "fairy tale" thing had no effect on me at all.

Was the comment "racist" or not? I always try to take such comments in the context of the person, and I don't think Bill is a racist. I do believe that Bill's underlying meaning was that race was a factor in Jackson's primary win. So what was Bill saying, that black people vote for other black people because they're black? I'm sure some do, and some whites vote only for other whites. The majority of both tend to vote for the person they think is best for the office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. That is brutal.
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. It's beautiful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. Beautifully, brutally,
frank.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
From The Left Donating Member (670 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. Clift is a cool gal.
It took courage to push back against the Clinton machine!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. "by seeming to inject race." Lovely, Obama shouts "racism" from the rooftops
and everyone buys it without ANY proof.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
writes3000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Sorry for you, people actually LISTENED to what Bill said.
And they made their own decisions about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Right. Because when he said that Obama's stance on the war is a
Edited on Sun Mar-02-08 01:24 PM by Evergreen Emerald
fairy tale, that is racist. What a load of crap.

Oh brother. I cannot understand how it is ok with you for Obama to denigrate another democrat so horribly, especially one who worked his whole life for the rights of minorities. He pulled something worse than Willie Horton (and of course he could not have succeeded if it weren't for the press).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
writes3000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. As I've said many times, I didn't feel like that was a racist comment.
Although I do think he was trying to demean Obama's chances overall.

It was the Jesse Jackson comment that sent me over the edge. And that came straight from his own lips. No interpretation needed.

I absolutely believe Bill Clinton loves black people. He just didn't love the one who got in his way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. Of course he was trying to deman Obama's chances...this is politics
But he did it fair and square--talking about the issues. Obama used racism to gain the voting block of SC.

And frankly, I do not want a president who is willing to divide the democratic party and play on the fears of racism to win an election.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthernSpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. ooooorrrrr you could take Clift and the many who feel the same way seriously...
... instead of just shouting them down, for a change.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. I think Elanor Clift is intelligent enough to see what's going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
union_maid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Whatever it was, was right out there in the open
If you heard what Bill said...the "Jesse Jackson won SC" comment, then you knew what he was doing. He was trying to make Obama into the "black candidate". He was trying to put him in the same category as various candidates who ran to make some particular point, without ever having a hope of winning. It was a logical enough strategy, but the fact remained that he was, in doing that, taking a bit of a dump on a truly historic moment. Win or lose, Obama is a mainstream, viable candidate and that's a first. That's progress, overdue, but progress nonetheless. If Clinton's remarks had stuck, that progress would have been wiped right out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Tell that to Clyburn, Leahy, Kennedy, Kerry, etc. Without proof? Right. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #7
33. Obama NEVER EVER shouted "racism". I believe it is YOUR candidate
who whines about being unfairly treated, and keeps talking about "being the first woman president". Obama, OTOH, has made sure that a) people vote for him for his ideas, not who he is (he only discusses that in terms of the American dream) and b) you will never hear him whining about racially sensitive remarks. He doesn't do that, and he never will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InAbLuEsTaTe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. Always liked Eleanor - this just reinforces my opinion. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
16. Fucking bil...does
it again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
18. It is threads like these which really burn up so many gays who got pissed by McClurkin
You know what, you have every right to be offended by what you percieve to be racial slights but then you turn around and call us phony gays for daring to get pissed at gay slights. That really does piss alot of us off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthernSpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. no, it was the ~selectivity~ of the McClurkin outrage on the part of some...
... certain people who have been all too eager to give their beloved Hillary a free pass on her weak stand on the DOMA, or her association with Rev. Rivers, etc. It was that sort of two-facedness that made some people's McClurkin rage seem fake.


If you're gonna tell the story, tell it right.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. and your outrage is just as selective
but of course you are allowed to feel the way you do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. correct; but racism counts, homophobia doesn't, don't you know? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
19. sometimes the softest jabs are the most deadly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apocalypsehow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
21. Excellent article. K & R.
n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
24. I didn't think it was racist...
The media took that and ran away with it..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
25. oh yeah, the clintons injected race.... blah blah blah. bs. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. Listen up. There were many dog-whistles before Bill's JJ remark..
Many people were warning the Clintons about them, but they blew them off and insisted that they were going to do whatever it took regardless of who didn't like it. Jim Clyburn warned them. Ted Kennedy warned them. There was talk about the seeminly racist comments by Team Clinton in print and in the media. The Clintons wouldn't listen. They were off the hook. The issue was brought up during a debate and Hillary shrugged her shoulders and tried to imply that Obama was to blame. When the list of offenses by Obama's camp was brought up during the debate, Obama apologized for the list that reportedly went out to journalists. Hillary sat there in triumph that she had managed to make Obama look like the one injecting race.

Then! Just before SC, Bill went totally off the hook. Not once but twice. In one instance carried by CNN, Bill made the outlandish comment about Obama putting a hit on him. See video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IvJJsXtpPvw

Then, if that wasn't bad enough, hours before the polls closed in SC, a reporter asked Bill what it meant that it took both him and Hillary for Obama to run against... And instead of answering that question, Bill blurted the now infamous comments about JJ winning. I was watching the all day coverage on MNNBC. Joe and Mika were arguing over the allegations about the racist remarks. Joe told Mika that he, being a southerner recognized the racist dog whistles that Team Clinton had been making. Mika said she didn't see it. Right after that, the now famous JJ video was shown. That was sometime between noon and 1pm. Not, AFTER the election results that the media has totally changed the dequence of the historical events. But that's how they roll as we all know. Mika was like, whoa! She said that she could no longer defend the Clintons against the charge because she had just seen it and heard it for herself.

See the JJ video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qqd2dfjl2pw

You Billarybots can try to rearrange history if you want, but there will always be an accurante account of events, thanks to you tube. Hillary is responsible for her own woes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
32. Eleanor speaks for me....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
34. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 04:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC