Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tony Rezko may hold the presidency in his hands.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 02:57 PM
Original message
Tony Rezko may hold the presidency in his hands.
Rezko goes to trial on Monday. Let's hope he doesn't end up staring at a long prison sentence. If he does and he has something on Obama, he could cut a deal that would decide the presidency. This is where you truly have to trust that Obama did nothing illegal or that could even be the basis of credible charges. Obama certainly doesn't act like he is worried.

Obama may become the presumptive nominee soon, but we won't know whether he will stay the nominee or become president until after this Rezko matter is settled. I don't ever recall a candidacy with a situation like this one. Clinton/Flowers and Bush/DUI pale by comparison. This election looks like it could be one hell of a ride. Why, after all these years of wheeling and dealing, is Rezko going to trial now?

BTW, this isn't slime. I am a Hillary supporter, partly because of the Rezko problem, but I am OK with Obama. He handled the plagiarism, lapel pin, and Al Qaeda in Iraq issues very well. I would be ecstatic if someone could persuade me that this Rezko thing isn't a powderkeg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DesEtoiles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. You have only read the propaganda, not the facts, on Rezko.
Educate yourself and try again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Help me with a link to the non-propaganda?
Seriously, if you have something credible that eliminates the issue, post it. Settle it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesEtoiles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. guess you don't know how to use Google
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
40. Try this...
Obama's interview with the Sun-Times in Nov 2006, where he answers over 20 explicit questions on the matter. He's not exactly ducking and weaving here, is he? Doesn't sound like someone trying to deflect scrutiny.

http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/124171,CST-NWS-obama05.article
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. GIVE IT UP THIS IS ALL BULL SHIT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. It's obvious that Rezko was expecting something from O...no!
Edited on Sun Mar-02-08 03:04 PM by indimuse
Obama can't get away with his lies...ANYMOE!
for 100K rendering the remaining piece (that Rezko's wife kept) virtually useless (completely unbuildable). So ,Rezko basically bought a piece of land for $600K so that Obama could buy the house next to it... Then Rezko devalued his property by selling part of it to Obama for 1/6th of the price and making the rest of his investment worthless!
Sure it's not illegal, but it sure is fishy. It's obvious that Rezko was expecting something in return...Obama IS backed by a Nulear Energy Co...and one of Obama's AND Rezko's bud's have a contract in Iraq..for some Nuclear Energy deal...just sayin...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. That's just deperate wishful thinking
stop wanking off to fantasies of Obama being a criminal mastermind. It's just sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omega3 Donating Member (412 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #21
31. yeah, they specifically put in HER name so the collectors after him couldn't get at the money
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. It isn't a powderkeg
end of story .... move on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. I don't think it's going to take Obama down, but Blago might be in for a world of hurt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LadyVT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yeah, well, his trial date was postponed until the last possible moment.
Not a coincidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
36. Yes, yes. Of course the Judge, Fitzgerald and the defense attny
are all part of the secret cabal controlling the Manchurian candidate, Barack Obama.

Take off the tin foil headwear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. Sort of like those straws slipping through your grasping fingers?
:eyes:

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stellanoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. Who hasn't had an unethical person with whom they've interacted?
The odds are with them.

I don't think this is a big deal anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
35. God knows that Jennifer and Monica were just the tip of the iceberg
The Clinton's have been Whitewatered to death.

That was all a shame but for sure the Republicans have known and will continue to know ,every move they make all day long. The Clinton's are being vetted all day long in case they are naive.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jezebel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. I thought Norman Hsu held it in his This is where you truly have to trust that H did nothing illegal
or that could even be the basis of credible charges.
Pot meet kettle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Did Hsu buy land right next to Hillary's? Maybe you are right, though...
... but the MSM is not picking up on the Hsu matter as true jeopardy for Clinton. The two look very different to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
10. Chatwal, Gupta, Giustra
Hsu, Trie, Chung, Huang...

If Rezko is so blasted important to you, then why do none of you care about the truck load of crooks connected to Hillary.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
33. I'm not seeing these in the MSM. To date, I have not seen...
...any of the crooks connected to Clinton with the same potential for trouble as Rezko. Rezko has been tight with Obama on a one-to-one basis and even participated in a land deal with him. This is more like Whitewater only the prosecution is going on right in the midst of the election.

But if you think there is anything like the Rezko issue going on with Hillary, post it. Maybe there is something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #33
39. Oooh, the media isn't reporting it???
So much for the unfair media attacks on Hillary. It's bullshit. There's much more dirt against her than against Obama. They aren't reporting it because she has the power to stop it. Just like she has the power to whine about sexism and get people suspended and fired. But to stop a war? Oh hell she can't even get on the teeve about that.

Wake UP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. i have no interest in the case, and from what I've read
there won't be anything new coming out.

and even if there was, what would be the worst he could say, I did a favor for a guy in exchange for a deal on a house?

wow. shocking. get the pitchforlks and torches ready.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #11
38. It's pretty obvious from the last two days what the marching orders
are from the Clinton shills working this site; Hit Obama hard on any and every thing Rezko-what is REALLY funny is IT AIN'T FUCKING WORKING and Hillary Clinton is about to lose 4 more contests on Tuesday and will have to suspend her campaign when 25 more super delegates switch over to Obama-SHE IS DONE and I laugh at all you fools who have been trying to hurt a fellow democrat with your lying bullshit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
13. he better bite the bullet and he will get pardoned, like all the rest
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
16. CONGRATS ON REZKO POST NUMBER 785
Edited on Sun Mar-02-08 03:04 PM by NightWatcher
and yall complained about whitewater coverage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesEtoiles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
17. Here is what Gulliver does NOT want you to read - the truth:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/2/18/103737/109/704/458974

This is for all those who have not yet been infected with the PLAGUE that is Obamamania... Yes, for those REAL DEMOCRATS out there who want the real news.

I fully expect to be flamed, drawn, and quartered for this, but there's been a brand new disclosure in the Rezko/Obama front that demands attention.

We all remember Tony Rezko, right? The indicted former "Friend of Barack" who, while under indictment, just so happened to go splitsies on a land purchase with the Obamas in 2005. Rezko (through his wife, Rita), bought a vacant parcel of land for full price - $625,000 - while the Obamas bought the adjacent house for $1.65 million - a full $300,000 off of the asking price!!!

We also remember how quickly Obamabots POUNCE on any mention of Rezko's name or any suggestion of any impropriety in this deal... How quickly they suggest that Obama's huge discount simply reflected real estate economics.

Well, well, well... Guess who decided to show up late to the party with a story to tell? The Sellers

Greuben's diary :: ::
That's right, America is about to become intimately acquainted with the names, Frederic Wondisford and Sally Radovick. An intrepid journalist tracked them down and asked them whether Obama received a favorable price because of the involvement of Rezko and his wife in the purchase of the vacant, adjacent parcel for full price. They were also asked whether Obama paid less than the next highest offer for the house.

What did they say?

The couple who sold Barack Obama his Chicago home said the Illinois senator's $1.65 million bid ``was the best offer'' and they didn't cut their asking price because a campaign donor bought their adjacent land, according to e- mails between Obama's presidential campaign and the seller.

Bloomberg - the Sellers Speak

That's right - read it and weep. Becasue of Rezko's involvement, the Obamas received a ZERO dollar discount from the price they would have paid from the market. Because of the Rezko's purchase of the adjoining plot, the Obamas beat out ZERO other bidders on the same property!

This is HUGE! Why did the Sellers come forward?

The sellers hadn't previously made their side of the story public out of concern for their privacy, according to Bill Burton, a spokesman for Obama's campaign. They approached Obama's Senate office 15 months ago and agreed to break their silence now through the campaign out of concern that the story was being distorted in the media, Burton said.

And check this out: how did they reach the sales price?

It also says that ``in the course of the negotiation over the sales price,'' Obama and his wife, Michelle, ``made several offers until the one accepted at $1.65 million, and that this was the best offer you received on the house.''

Wondisford has declined to talk directly about the matter.

The Obamas submitted three bids: $1.3 million on Jan. 15, 2005; $1.5 million on Jan. 21; and $1.65 million on Jan. 23, according to a copy of the sale contract shown to Bloomberg News. Obama received more than $1.2 million in book royalties and a book advance in 2005, the year he was sworn in to the U.S. Senate, his financial disclosure statement shows.

I think this is very telling about how the Obamas do business in general: they are clearly NEGOTIATORS who will COMPROMISE on price points in order to close a deal. Why didn't they stick to their demand of $1.3 million? Where is their backbone? And do we really want to elect a President who is able to negotiate a good deal on a piece of real estate without receiving financial favors?

Finally, check out this damning admission of how Rezko DIRECTLY helped Obama purchase the property:

Burton said Obama toured the property with Rezko for 15 to 30 minutes at some point before the purchase. Burton said Obama wanted Rezko's opinion of the property because Rezko was a real- estate developer in the area. Burton said he didn't know when the pre-sale tour occurred.

Wow. Just shocking. An admission that Rezko directly assisted Obama in purchasing the property with 15 to up to 30 minutes of assistance and "free," undisclosed, professional advice as to whether the Obamas should buy the property or not, and whether the Rezkos were going to purchase the adjacent parcel.

Imagine that: a politician with a friend in the real estate business asks his friend for advice as to a real estate purchase. And the friend gives that advice without receiving anything in return.

Is this the man we want to elect as President? Someone who asks questions before taking decisive action? Someone who negotiates to a more favorable price and backs down from an initial demand?

I think not. I rest my case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. No, I've read this.
Charges would already have been filed against Obama if there were something known now. That's not the point. The point is that Rezko may be staring at prison time shortly. That's when things that weren't known before become known. What will Rezko do if he is facing prison and he has the power to hand the U.S. presidency to the Republicans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
18. The judge was on Ken Starr's Whitewater staff and has been on quite a fast track
Even IF there isn't any "there" there, I don't think its going to be ignored by the MSM. The legal personell connections to Plame and Whitewater make it ratings fodder before they even look at Rezko.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
19. Rezko is a Chicago issue, not one of national importance
Sorry, but you wont get the Obama scandal you're hoping for out of that trial.

It sucks, but Hillary will have to face the voters on her own merits, not on Obama's merits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. Fitzgerald and St. Eve making it a ratings draw before we even look at testimony
Edited on Sun Mar-02-08 03:11 PM by wlucinda
With ties between the judge and Whitewater and Fitzgerald with Plame you think it's going to be just a local story?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
20. There were no other bidders on the property
If there were, and a deal was cut, that may look suspicious, but the Obamas were the only people to make an offer to the owners.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monomach Donating Member (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
22. As someone who's had this shoved down his throat since it happened...
OBAMA IS NOT IN TROUBLE AT ALL.

They don;t have jack on him, despite attempts for so damned long by my hometown papers (Sun-times and Tribune).

Look for Governor Blagoklhfhsfjklhsjklfhfhjkldshfjkldsovich to get in some trouble, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
25. Aaaarrrgghh... I Can't Say It, I Can't Say It, I Fucking Can't Say It !!!
:banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead:
:banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead:
:banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead:
:banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead:
:banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead:
:banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead:


:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
27. Obama did nothing wrong and is not involved in this trial
So I don't know why you Clinton folks feel that this name needs to be repeated over and over and over here on DU. You guys can't manufacture a scandal by posting innuendo on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBInMaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
28. Or maybe Norman Hsu holds the presidency in HIS hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
29. "but I am OK with Obama."
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #29
34. That actually wasn't a joke...
...but I'll take a laugh any way I can get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omega3 Donating Member (412 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
32. only IF the MSM covers this, they're most likely waiting till after 3/5
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hulka38 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. OMG - that is classic satire. Only this poster sounds serious -
which makes it even funnier. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
41. I don't give a crap about Rezko....
..... just like I didn't give a crap about all the "guilt by association" bullshit the right wing tried to pin in Bill Clinton all through the 90s.

Supporters of HRC are hanging on to a totally false hope that somehow, anyhow HRC can pin some dirt on Obama in time to save HRC's campaign.

Nobody gives a shit about Rezko except the rabid HRC supporters who cannot accept they are losing. Tough nookies.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC