Race or Gender? Neither Rises to the Level of the Real Question Which is All About Iraq.

[David Zephyr]

One candidate supported the war in Iraq: HIllary Clinton

One candidate opposed the war in Iraq: Barack Obama.

The choice in front of us has nothing to do with race or gender. It's all about this fucking war that has cost the lives of 1 million Iraqi civilians.

One candidate was wrong. And one candidate was right.

That's the choice. There is no other issue that rises to that level. None.

It's all about Iraq.

http://www.monthlyherald.com/photos_of_the_victims_of_the_usa.htm

[The_Casual_Observer]

1. & Everybody voted to fund it.

Obombthem doesn't know it he would have voted for the IWR or not.

Get off your high horse on this already.

[Name removed]

3. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[David Zephyr]

6. Thank you,, FrenchieCat for keeping it real.

The distinction between the two candidates is clear. One supported this war and one clearly opposed it.

And that is going to be my only issue until the nomination is determined. The rest is distraction.

[The_Casual_Observer]

9. Then why did he vote to fund it?

He's on every side of the Iraq war & you are all for it!

[FrenchieCat]

15. Your question should be "why did they all vote to fund it?"

See Senator Kennedy's voting record here: http://www.votesmart.org/voting_category.php?can_id=53305

[The_Casual_Observer]

16. Why did O-bombiraq vote for it, after promising that he wouldn't?

[MethuenProgressive]

7. Spamming DU doesn't change the truth about Obama's Fairy Tale record on Iraq.

He gave a small speech one time at a small rally, and then fell silent.
When asked later it was 'I don't know how I would've voted on the IRW" and "my position on Iraq is the same as George Bush's"...

[The_Casual_Observer]

8. No he didn't.

And your spam is meaningless. It is boring.

[sandnsea]

2. And the mindset

that allowed one candidate's "experts" to accept and promote the WMD intelligence; and the other who rejected that intelligence and chose to surround himself with experts who also rejected that intelligence.

Hillary is STILL listening to the same damn Democratic experts who believed the WMD intelligence. That's why she voted for Kyl-Lieberman. They believe in the US global domination policy.

[David Zephyr]

4. Absolutely! And I'm going to be talking a lot here from now on about Iraq. Join me.

It's the issue that Hillary does not want discussed, isn't it?

[sandnsea]

11. Oh, but she wants a debate on foreign policy

isn't that what she said yesterday? I wish they would really get into the details of foreign policy, oil, minerals, shipping lanes, and what those billions of military dollars are really paying for.

[MethuenProgressive]

5. If Iraq mattered to Democrats Bill Richardson would be our nominee.

It doesn't, so he isn't.

www.TheDifferenceOnIraq.com

[David Zephyr]

10. Now I've seen it all. We have a DU'er who boldly posts that Iraq doesn't matter.

You actually have the indecency to say that Iraq doesn't matter?

Now I understand you. You are the DU'er who says Iraq doesn't matter.

[MethuenProgressive]

12. Don't put words in my mouth. I supported Richardson because Iraq DOES matter.

We're left with Obama and Clinton as choices because you people don't think Iraq matters.
www.TheDifferenceOnIraq.com

[David Zephyr]

13. Your post #5 says the war doesn't matter.

Unless there is a parallel language to English that uses words to suggest the opposite of their meaning.

[MethuenProgressive]

14. The difference on Iraq is Obama wants us there until 2013

www.TheDifferenceOnIraq.com
www.2013IsTooLate.com