Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Didn't Hillary Read the NIE Report in 2002?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 05:53 PM
Original message
Why Didn't Hillary Read the NIE Report in 2002?
A war means that people, innocent people, die, so why not get ALL of the facts YOURSELF before you vote for people dying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. If she had, would there be a record of it?
Anybody know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Yes, There's An Official Record of Who Read It
Edited on Sun Mar-02-08 06:03 PM by Yavin4
Quote: And there is a (classified) list of who did and who didn't because members had to visit a secure room -- called the SCIF -- at the Capitol to view it.

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/05/25/204032.aspx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Thank you. I wonder why she didn't pick up the phone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
43. "available to any member who showed up in person, without staff"
If staff couldn't see the NIE and other intelligence docs, who briefed her? Was the only briefing she got from Condi?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Is this what Bill Clinton showed Hillary? Just get a briefing on NIEs
don't read it yourself?

I would think he was more thorough than this.

But what do I know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Schema Thing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Because it's contents were not politically popular at the time
Edited on Sun Mar-02-08 06:01 PM by AchtungToddler
Why read an NIE when you're finger and the wind have already told you what you think you need to know? Besides, how bad could this invasion go; my friends have been pushing for it for ages, and it will all end up in Bush's lap anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. Because The Military Reality Was Not Of Interest
Her blowing off the NIE clearly demonstrates that her concerns were for her own political future, and not the future of other people, and of other people's kids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. EXACTLY
She makes decisions based on her political fortunes, not what is or is not good policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. Ouch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #22
32. Does Any Other Answer Make Sense?
I don't see any that do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Either that or she's just stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. She wanted to get to bed early in case the phone rang at 3AM? nt
Edited on Sun Mar-02-08 06:01 PM by hedgehog
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. LOL!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. She voted for political gain. the truth didn't matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
10. :( We deserve better. My heart breaks for those who have died nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. How credible do you think those reports actually are? The White House has final say on it's contents
and, the agencies and individuals who generate those reports are solidly in the White House's pocket, especially with the heavy hand this administration has exerted on them.

Did Obama eventually read them? Is that all he would rely on to make his decision on that vote. It seems like a slim reed he's hanging on here. Sen. Clinton has said she read the summary of the report and consulted other military sources to form her decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Reading the NIE convinced Dick Durbin to vote Nay
how's that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. different Senators used different rationale on that vote
That was the attitude Kennedy took when he campaigned for Kerry in 2004.
That was the attitude Obama took toward Kerry in 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. Wha?
What does that even mean?

I said Richard Durbin read the NIE. Richard Durbin voted against the IWR because he read the NIE. Ted Kennedy also voted against the IWR. I don't know if he read the NIE. John Kerry voted for the IWR but publicly renounced his decision almost immediately afterwards.

Hillary Clinton neither read the NIE nor has she renounced her vote for the IWR. She made a bad choice based on inefficiency and has never apologized or expressed remorse.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #25
37. So Durbin made his mind up by reading the administration-generated NIE
good for him. Other senators, Clinton included, got their info from a variety of sources. It's not so hard to understand that different legislators rely on different sources of info they trust to make their judgments. It's just not credible to point to one legislator and their fact-gathering habits as the beat all for knowledge and wisdom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. okay
It's not fair. Hillary Clinton claims she thought long and hard about the IWR. She thoroughly researched the intelligence. Her words. She said she researched the intelligence thoroughly...

Have you ever watched this?

http://youtube.com/watch?v=2_KEWUU33Lg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #37
50. Bob Graham also read the NIE
If you don't want to trust Durbin, then what about Bob Graham, who was the Chair of the Senate Intelligence committee at the time?

You should take a look at this interview he gave to Frontline:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/darkside/interviews/graham.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. Not so fast, check this out
Why Hillary Clinton’s Iraq Vote Does Matter by Stephen Zunes
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/02/23/7245/

...Despite her much-touted “experience,” Senator Clinton has demonstrated, through her support for the Bush administration’s invasion and occupation of Iraq, a profound ignorance of the reality of the Middle East and an arrogant assumption that peace, stability and democratic governance can be created through the application of U.S. military force.

In the months leading up to the Iraq war vote, Senator Clinton was briefed by a number of arms control specialists, former arms inspectors, strategic analysts, and others who informed her that the Bush administration’s WMD claims were not to be taken seriously and that Iraq had achieved at least qualitative disarmament... Despite this... Senator Clinton insisted that Iraq’s possession of chemical and biological weapons was “not in doubt” and was “undisputed.”

Similarly, even after the International Atomic Energy Agency issued a report prior to the war vote that Iraq no longer had a nuclear program and despite the 2001 National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) that confirmed there was no evidence that such work on Iraq’s nuclear program had resumed, Senator Clinton also defended her vote by claiming that, “If left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will . . . keep trying to develop nuclear weapons.”

Clinton’s supporters have defended her false pre-invasion allegations by citing the public summary of the 2002 NIE which appeared to confirm some of the Bush administration’s claims. However, there were a number of reasons to have been skeptical of this summary: this NIE was compiled in a much shorter time frame than is normally provided for such documents and the report expressed far more certainty regarding Iraq’s WMD capabilities than all the reports from the previous five years, despite the lack of additional data to justify such a shift. When the report was released, there was much stronger dissent within the intelligence community than about any other NIE in history and the longer classified version, which was available to every member of Congress, included these dissenting voices from within the intelligence community. It was also well-known through media reports at that time that the administration was applying enormous pressure on the intelligence agencies to put together a report emphasizing the alleged Iraqi threat.

Despite this, the NIE also challenged the notion of any operational ties between the Iraqi government and Al-Qaeda and questioned some of the more categorical claims by President Bush about Iraq’s WMDs. However, Senator Clinton didn’t even bother to read it. She now claims that it wasn’t necessary for her to have actually looked at the 92-page document herself because she was briefed on the contents of the report. However, since no one on her staff was authorized to read it, it’s unclear who could have actually briefed her.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #21
38. I'm not debating this article.
Forget it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #38
47. yeah, forget pesky things like facts and truth
HRC voted aye on IWR and couldn't be bothered to read the NIE because she was coldly calculating her political moves toward this current POTUS bid. Many of us who saw her vote then for what it is will not, and have not, forgotten her willful poor judgment, lack of leadership and political cowardice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WolverineDG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
27. With all of her trumpeted WH experience
she would have seen it was all bullshit & the information cherry-picked. Hundreds of thousands of others around the world, including me & Barack Obama, didn't have access to these reports & WE somehow knew it was bullshit. And the only WH "experience" I have is a tour I took of it back in the 90s.

dg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voice for Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #27
39. Yes. Her experience claim is completely suspect to me. I have yet to hear a
good argument as to why her experience qualifies her to be president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
From The Left Donating Member (670 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
13. Hill Said She Was "Briefed"
Edited on Sun Mar-02-08 06:31 PM by From The Left
That's right. "Briefed."

The data used to form a decision to go to war and Hillary couldn't be bothered to take it to the Clinton's Chappaqua estate to read it before voting to give Bush the authority to start a war.

Some judgment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #13
23. no she was lazy and calculating, check this out
Why Hillary Clinton’s Iraq Vote Does Matter by Stephen Zunes
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/02/23/7245 /

... the NIE also challenged the notion of any operational ties between the Iraqi government and Al-Qaeda and questioned some of the more categorical claims by President Bush about Iraq’s WMDs. However, Senator Clinton didn’t even bother to read it. She now claims that it wasn’t necessary for her to have actually looked at the 92-page document herself because she was briefed on the contents of the report. However, since no one on her staff was authorized to read it, it’s unclear who could have actually briefed her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #23
42. we know who briefed her. Mark Penn, Howard wolfson, and 3 poll results
Oh, I forgot. a focus group, too.

The idea that she is/was/will be ready on day one is so REED-iculous as to be laughable. She would run this country much like she ran her campaign. Into the ground. Think of Bush-Lite, and you have Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
14. What good would reading a "cooked" NIE do?
Edited on Sun Mar-02-08 06:30 PM by Ravy
She was briefed on what it said. I am sure the briefing was accurate.

PS. People were dying either way. The best way to stop death was the IWR, had it been properly executed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #14
26. BULLSHIT, here's why actually reading it mattered
Why Hillary Clinton’s Iraq Vote Does Matter by Stephen Zunes
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/02/23/7245 /

Clinton’s supporters have defended her false pre-invasion allegations by citing the public summary of the 2002 NIE which appeared to confirm some of the Bush administration’s claims. However, there were a number of reasons to have been skeptical of this summary: this NIE was compiled in a much shorter time frame than is normally provided for such documents and the report expressed far more certainty regarding Iraq’s WMD capabilities than all the reports from the previous five years, despite the lack of additional data to justify such a shift. When the report was released, there was much stronger dissent within the intelligence community than about any other NIE in history and the longer classified version, which was available to every member of Congress, included these dissenting voices from within the intelligence community. It was also well-known through media reports at that time that the administration was applying enormous pressure on the intelligence agencies to put together a report emphasizing the alleged Iraqi threat.

Despite this, the NIE also challenged the notion of any operational ties between the Iraqi government and Al-Qaeda and questioned some of the more categorical claims by President Bush about Iraq’s WMDs. However, Senator Clinton didn’t even bother to read it. She now claims that it wasn’t necessary for her to have actually looked at the 92-page document herself because she was briefed on the contents of the report. However, since no one on her staff was authorized to read it, it’s unclear who could have actually briefed her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #14
52. It was not "cooked"
There was information in the NIE that specifically contradicted her assertions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #52
53. Read it. It is available. Don't take my or anyone else's opinion on it.
But to me, it clearly states that they think he has programs and WMDs.

Bush specifically released it because he thought it bolstered his case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
15. Reading is like hard and stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
From The Left Donating Member (670 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. HAHAHAHAHA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
17. She didn't have time! Like with her tax return info!
Apparently she's not too good with the time management thingie but she's probably taking an audio course so she'll be ready on day one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
19. Too busy answering the phone?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
24. I am not sure why I even respond, as I know you know this
and are just posting crap because you will look for anything to attack Clinton with.

The assistants for ALL the senators read the bills and summarize them in reports. The Senators are then briefed on the summaries and read the reports.

It is done ALL THE TIME BY ALL OF THEM.

But, please. Don't let facts stop you from burning the witch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. So do you have an answer to the question as to why Hillary didn't bother
to read the NIE report.

It appears that facts are required here.

I'm not sure about the "witch" comment, but this sounds sexist. Why do that? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. Assistants didn't have the clearance
for the NIE... don't let facts get in YOUR way!

Why Hillary Clinton’s Iraq Vote Does Matter by Stephen Zunes
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/02/23/7245 /

Senator Clinton didn’t even bother to read it. She now claims that it wasn’t necessary for her to have actually looked at the 92-page document herself because she was briefed on the contents of the report. However, since no one on her staff was authorized to read it, it’s unclear who could have actually briefed her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. You are wrong on the NIE
Only the Senators and Congress people are allowed to read those kind of documents. They read them in private rooms with armed security guards. They don't sent their assistants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #24
36. Even If Her Assistants Could Read It
She's going to let a life and death decision hinge on her staff's "interpretation" of the report?

Wow, that says a lot about her management style.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MojoMojoMojo Donating Member (579 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
31. Hillary voted for inspections, read her floor speech
Obama wants to reserve the option to reinvade Iraq ,bomb Iran,bomb Pakistan,escalate Afghanistan.
Do you suppose he will ever need authority from Congress?
If he asks for authority, should Congress all vote no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
34. Too busy preparing her disingenous speech
before the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fenriswolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
35. two words: plausible deniability nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
41. There were 3 Dem Senators who didn't want on the wrong
Edited on Sun Mar-02-08 07:36 PM by RamboLiberal
side of this issue - or that's how they figured it at the time. They had their eyes on the prize of the Presidency. And all 3 showed at least to me at the time they lacked political courage. 3 who could not even be bothered to read the full NIE! Clinton, Edwards and Kerry!

Here's list of Dems who say they read the full report.

Then voting Nay: Byrd, Dayton, Durbin, Graham, Inouye, Kennedy, Leahy, Levin, Mikulski, Wyden

Then voting Yea: Bayh, Biden, Feinstein, Rockefeller.

That was one huge disappoint I had at the time of many Dems in D.C. On the Patriot Bill and IWR they stuck their fingers in the political wind at the time, didn't read the full details of what they were voting on and then voted to enable Bush! There sure was a lack of Profiles in Courage there and there continues to be.

In the future I'd like to see some of these Dems face good primary challenges at home by Dems more commited to listening to their constituents.

http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/few-senators-read-iraq-nie-report-2007-06-19.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tennessee Gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
44. Here we go again.
The speech he made showed that Obama would have been opposed to a war in Iraq from what he knew at the time. That's not the same as being opposed to the Iraq War Resolution that gave the President the authority to go to war as a supposed last resort. Had Obama said something to the effect of being opposed to a war in Iraq "even as a last resort" or "under any circumstance", then that would be proof that he wouldn't of voted for the Resolution. But he said no such thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. That's Not My Question
My question is why didn't Hillary read the NIE report?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #46
49. notice how Team Hillary willfully
avoids facts and, in this case, the question at hand?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superkia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
45. Maybe she has the same agenda that bushco has and thought...
if she said she didn't want war but also spewed propaganda for war in the same speech that the sheeple would still follow her? Thats my guess. Play the fence with your words but vote for the agenda you support and then say oh I was just stupid and bushie got one over on me...thats a leader we want right? America always votes for the lesser of the evils and Obama is the OBVIOUS choice at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
48. Why didn't she read the Patriot Act before voting for it? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. Because she had to answer the Red Phone,
while hiding under her desk.

Would have been awkward? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC