Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Suffolk University Poll (3/1-3/2): Clinton (52) Obama (40)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
malik flavors Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:12 AM
Original message
Suffolk University Poll (3/1-3/2): Clinton (52) Obama (40)
Couldn't tell you much about this poll. Seems to be a pretty big difference in comparison to most other polls, but here it is, for what it's worth.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/docs/FinalOHIOMarginalsMarch22008.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
quantass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. Check out Suffolk's Poll record -- Most results were completely wrong.
Edited on Mon Mar-03-08 12:17 AM by quantass
This is why you need to use multiple results from other sources and look for a pattern...this University's record has been weak over this election...google them up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. 16% are under 45
That pretty much sums up that poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. 40-45 is the average
It was 44% below 45 in New Hampshire. 40% in South Carolina. 40% in California. You get my point.

Also, they only sampled 8% African Americans, when turnout is expected to be doubled that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Hell, even Michigan, an uncontested primary, got 43%
I think Michigan is the best comparison for what will happen in Ohio, although those in Ohio will surely object to that. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. Maybe northern Ohio, southern Ohio is almost a southern state.The state is nothing if not diverse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ORDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
17. Polls are weighted by categories, so this is not a valid argument
against their methodology. You can't get a perfect sampling of all age groups, so you weight the results accordingly. Anyway, it does look like an outlier in any case. There's no dynamic in the last couple of days that would account for such a large swing.

:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alhena Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. 38% of those polled were over 65 - did they call a retirement home?
Edited on Mon Mar-03-08 12:19 AM by Alhena
an additional 25% were 56-65. So 63% of their poll was over age 56- great poll, guys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adoraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUyellow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. check this out...
Q11. Of the following categories, which comes closest to your age?
N= 400 100%
18-25 .......................................... 1 ( 1/305) 6 2%
26-35 .......................................... 2 16 4%
36-45 .......................................... 3 40 10%
46-55 .......................................... 4 86 22%
56-65 .......................................... 5 98 25%
Over 65 ........................................ 6 152 38%
Refused (DO NOT READ) .......................... 7 2 1%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. 18-45 is 16%? Bull fuckin shit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. And what would be a realistic estimate of the breakdown of the ages that will turn out to vote?
I have never really looked at the numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. I'll answer my own question. In Wisconsin it was
18-34 = 16%
34-44 = 22%
45-59 = 34%
60+ = 29%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. Well going by the 2004 primary, those numbers are way off.
Edited on Mon Mar-03-08 12:31 AM by Drunken Irishman
18-29 (9%)
30-44 (23%)
45-64 (46%)
65 and Older (22%)

18-64 (78%)
65 and Older (22%)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
8. wow what a shitty poll
Why would they even publish this poll on RCP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
9. They have severely undersampled Independents
Indies were 24% in 2004. This poll says 9%. That's wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. And blacks
14% in 2004, 8% in this poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
11. They severely underpolled 18-45, which in every other state is from 30-45 percent of the vote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
16. All you need to know about Suffolk is this poll from Massachusetts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shiestyelbow Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
18. I'm beginning to worry about Ohio
Hopefully he comes through in Texas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Dont worry about Ohio. He may lose, but this poll is worthless
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adoraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. this poll really means nothing
simply put, they way over sampled the group heavily favoring Clinton and way under sampled the group heavily supporting Obama. This would basically be like way over sampling whites and way under sampling blacks in a deep south state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
milkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. Don't. Obama will net a lot more delegates in Vermont than Hillary will in Ohio. Even if Hillary
wins a close popular vote in Ohio, she might win fewer delegates than Barack. Even a win of 8% will not net here more than about 5 delegates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC