BOSSHOG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-01-04 01:19 PM
Original message |
Why won't bush release condi's speech she never gave? |
|
Let's see, if it said all the kinds of things the dumbasses wanted it to say, every network, newspaper, right wing shill on the planet would have been "leaked" a copy. Her speech is just more damning evidence that Richard Clarke and Paul O'Neil were right.
What an incredibly disgusting human being george bush is.
|
librechik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-01-04 01:20 PM
Response to Original message |
1. the content proves Clarke's point, that's why. n/t |
Nite Owl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-01-04 01:25 PM
Response to Original message |
2. And we know what would have |
|
happened if this was Clinton! It would have been Breaking News, special programs, questions like 'Is this the end of Clinton?'. Such hypocrisy and it's so obvious.
|
TheBlob
(805 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-01-04 01:30 PM
Response to Original message |
|
The speech includes some bashing of the previous administrations 'obsession' with terrorism.
|
F.Gordon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-01-04 01:35 PM
Response to Original message |
4. In the mean time....how bout' this speech? |
|
Condi Rice; December 2000.... http://www.ifpafletcherconference.com/army2000/transcripts/rice.htmI doubt the 12/00 speech and the 09/01 speech differ much. Cept' the 9/01 speech was probably fine-tuned and mentioned Saddam a dozen or so times.....
|
genius
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-01-04 02:49 PM
Response to Original message |
5. One station said there was no mention of Bin Laden or Al Qaeda |
|
That's shows it was low priority.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 08th 2024, 08:07 PM
Response to Original message |