Bush Aides Block Clinton's Papers From 9/11 Panel

[Thrill]

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/02/politics/02PANE.html?hp

[mhr]

1. Maybe The Papers Hold The Simple Truth That Clinton Was "On The Job"

eom

[AntiCoup2K4]

2. They really are arrogant dumbshits, aren't they?

Don't they realize how transparent their motives are here? Obviously, the Clinton papers must mention details of how THEY were going after Al Qaeda, perhaps even records of how close they came to putting a missile up Osama's ass in 1998 when the Pukes were accusing him of "wagging the dog" to get the blow job fiasco out of the press.

[Catch22Dem]

3. This should be a story

It appears to support Clarke's claims that Clinton had an actual plan whereas * had jack shit.

[Thrill]

4. UNreal

"If it did happen, it's an unintentional mistake or it's another intentional act of the White House that will backfire," said Bob Kerrey, a former senator from Nebraska who is a Democratic member of the commission.

[Sparkly]

5. Didn't the Bushies seal off other Clinton documents early on?

I recall that early into the Bush invasion, they hid away documents from prior administrations (Reagan/Bush) that the timing would otherwise have made public, along with all documents pertaining to the investigation OF Clinton. At the time, it was controversial because Clinton himself was not asking them to be secret, but the Bushies did it for "national security." Anybody else remember this?

[Leilani]

6. What a disgrace!

This is the most secretive & duplicitous admin in my lifetime.