Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why did Obama win Wisconsin but lose Ohio?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:09 PM
Original message
Why did Obama win Wisconsin but lose Ohio?
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/

Wisconsin February 19, 2008
Obama 58%
Clinton 41%

Ohio March 4, 2008
Obama 44%
Clinton 54%

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Because they are not the same state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Different demographics.
And she ran a sleezy campaign there. Complete with fake new reports, a la Rove/Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I'm impressed
with the voters she won who stated that race was an issue. Impressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. Different how? NT
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinkpops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. Demographics - yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. And a different date -- the Ohio vote was AFTER the leak about Obama's NAFTA
comments to the Canadians (saying that his Ohio rhetoric against NAFTA was just that -- rhetoric for the purpose of the campaign).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #19
40. and the Canadians waited until today to refute this.
Convenient for Hillary, wouldn't you say?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Aliens. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. People knew more about him by the time Ohio voted. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mohc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. Why did Kerry win WI and not OH? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Because in 2004 voting machines in Ohio were sent to Republican precincts...
Edited on Wed Mar-05-08 08:15 PM by Eric J in MN
...to create long lines which lasted for hours in Democratic precincts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mohc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. touche n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. WI has always had a reputation of being more progressive.
Look how the negative ads backfired in WI but worked in OH.

I imagine WI is a more educated state as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. Winning Wisconsin made him the presumptive nominee and the press started
treating him like a candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
9. Obama's message went stale
as it will continue to do.

Obama has no real message or plans to offer voters. Hearing the nice, but empty speeches works for a while, but eventually people want more proof that he's got something real to offer.

Each week brings more bad news for the economy, each week can be a lifetime in worry over bills, jobs, financial security. Obama isn't doing much to prove his worth to voters on those issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Funny, I'm in Ohio and I voted for him anyway.
I think he has a real message and plans, and I don't find his speeches empty at all. I don't find anything you say about him to be the least true.

And, by the way, I'm educated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kukesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #12
39. I'm educated, too, and I voted for him. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
9119495 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
32. you should check out his website
so I don't have to post all the stuff from there on DU. But then, you've probably never been.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
11. Probably just some plot or something. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
13. Cheese.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosetta627 Donating Member (515 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. LMAO!!!
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
16. The leak from the Canadians that said Obama reassured them about NAFTA,
Edited on Wed Mar-05-08 08:19 PM by pnwmom
saying that his anti-NAFTA rhetoric in Ohio was just for campaign purposes.

If I were an Ohio voter, I would have been pissed off to hear that. And maybe the Wisconsin voters would have been too -- but their vote happened BEFORE the leak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. You mean the story that has been discredited by the CBC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. The Canadians basically confirmed it today. They're only objecting to the fact
that the leak wasn't "fair" to Obama. So they're going to be going after the leakers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. The Obama economic advisor told the Canadians...
...the Obama isn't fundamentally against NAFTA but wants more labor and environmental protections.

That is the same thing Obama said during the last debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. He also told the Canadians not to worry, that his anti-NAFTA comments
Edited on Wed Mar-05-08 08:57 PM by pnwmom
were about "political positioning."

He didn't say that during the debate.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601082&sid=aHmZxiKnNsIQ&refer=canada

March 5 (Bloomberg) -- Canadian opposition parties urged Prime Minister Stephen Harper to call a police investigation into a leaked memo about Senator Barack Obama's position on the North American Free Trade Agreement, saying it may have affected voting in yesterday's U.S. Democratic primaries.

Austan Goolsbee, Obama's top economic adviser, met with Canadian consulate officials in Chicago last month, and a memo describing the meeting said he had assured them Obama's promise to re-open Nafta was ``more about political positioning than a clear articulation of policy plans.''

SNIP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. That's a way to summarize it which sounds bad.
Edited on Wed Mar-05-08 09:26 PM by Eric J in MN
However, neither Hillary Clinton nor Barack Obama has said that they want to end NAFTA, and they're both criticizing it.

If that Canadian official had talked to a Hillary Clinton advisor, he probably would have written the same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omega3 Donating Member (412 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
21. the MSM started to treat him equitably
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
23. Ohio and Wisconsin aren't all that similar, to be honest.
But before Wisconsin, there was no "kitchen sink." A lot of shit was thrown at him in the weeks before Ohio (3 AM, SNL(x2), working the refs, Somali garb email to Drudge, "Shame on you Barack Obama," GOP-Vote-For-Hillary campaign that dominated talk radio, NAFTAgate, Rezco, etc. etc.)

He still gained 10 points on her in those three weeks, and she's not leaving Ohio with the delegates she'd most hoped for. The cities went big for Obama and helped decrease her 20 point lead weeks ago, but in the end, we ran out of time.

Oh, and the "kitchen sink."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
25. Ohio is much more centrist than Wisconsin.
Edited on Wed Mar-05-08 08:36 PM by NJSecularist
Wisconsin has more of a progressive streak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. Say what? That's better.
Edited on Wed Mar-05-08 09:16 PM by GodlessBiker
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
26. Wisconsinites are generally more affluent, employed and educated
than the demographics of Ohio
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galadrium Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
27. We had a crapload of right wingers crashing the primary
Following Rush's suggestion that they vote for Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MojoMojoMojo Donating Member (579 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
29. Wisconsin, Obama went negative with Nafta and Lied about Bankruptcy Bill
Hillary didnt respond and it killed her.
She didnt vote for or support the bankruptcy bill that became law.


"Her supporting NAFTA didn't give jobs to the American people," Obama said of the free-trade agreement implemented while Bill Clinton was president. "Her supporting a bankruptcy bill made it harder for people to get out of debt that didn't help them with the bills that were stacking up on their desks."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
33. Wisconsin is open primary with same day registration, plus more progressive dems
Ohio is closed primary with registration deadline one month before, plus more conservative dems
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
34. Because Wisconsin is more upscale, affluent, educated. It's closer to MN than OH.
Edited on Wed Mar-05-08 09:31 PM by Unsane
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. agree. it is more educated. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
35. because she endorsed mccain over Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
37. I think WI has more a zeal for independence and OH well... how do I put this lightly
well there really is no way to put it lightly

but let me just say it is not like WI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kukesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. LOL -- from a Buckeye. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
41. Hillary also had the strong support of a very popular Ohio governor
Ted and Frances Strickland campaigned non-stop for her. She also got strong support from blue collar labor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC