Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anyone else remember what happened back in 1968 when the

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:13 PM
Original message
Anyone else remember what happened back in 1968 when the
Party establishment decided to go with Humphrey?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, I wasn't born yet, but I've never heard of a President Humphrey.
So I'm guessing it didn't end well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:22 PM
Original message
This is what happened..........

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. I think we're way more apt to see those scenes at the Republican Convention
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. That's the answer I was looking for. Anyone who thinks defeating
McCain is a given should remember 1968.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Nixon wasn't preceded by 8 years of Bush. McCain is finished before he begins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes, what do you wnt to know? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RummyTheDummy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. I wasn't alive then....
But know about it and was wondering if the Hillary supporters will resort to violence if it goes to the convention and they don't get what they want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. yeah I can just see her base of older women getting violent.....NOT now look at BO's base
and decide for yourself which is more likely to be violent if their candidate isn't selected by the super d's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. self-delete, trying to use better judgment...
Edited on Wed Mar-05-08 09:32 PM by wienerdoggie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Madam Mossfern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. It was Mayor Daley's police
that were violent. I remember it well as a McCarthy supporter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. It wasn't pretty, I watched on tv, good thing it isn't in chicago this year...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RummyTheDummy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. I don't know, my lesbian friends are pretty tough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cd3dem Donating Member (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. women are tough... either way they swing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cd3dem Donating Member (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
24. you must be single buddy! because this woman can hold her own!
now I am not for violence but I have protested a time or two!

and I bet the young puppies for Obama are rookies!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. I am a woman, I have held my own more than once, but this isn't worth it to me
I am damn sure am not going to get in a physical confrontation for any politician
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. I do. 2008 won't be like '68.
We wanted to overthrow the whole rotten system. There is no such movement today. Obama isn't Gene McCarthy and there's no revolution.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. RFK edged out McCarthy, then was killed. McGovern made a very late entrance.
There really was no contender against Humphrey after June 4. The riots were caused by police and Chicago politicians.

There is no analogy to Obama there, Chicago excluded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
11. no similarities regarding the mood of the nation
remember Bobby and King had just been assassinated, we had a draft that was sending young men to a war they didn't want to fight.

Protests were going on around the country on campus, covert agents were active, drug use was high (pun?)

It is a different climate today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. That's true. I don't see riots over health care plans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Can't afford to get hurt!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Hell, No, We Won't Bleed, HMO Will Be Too Peeved!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
14. That was the first year I could have voted
and I didn't because I was so pissed off. In retrospect, President Humphrey might not have been so bad...a hell of a lot better that Nixon, but I was young and didn't think things through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. I went with Eldridge Cleaver and the Peace and Freedom Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. The war would have ended, the push for Civil Rights would
have continued at a far better pace, the infrastructure would have been enhanced...a whole lot of positives would have come from a Humphrey administration.

He was a humanitarian, he fought incessantly for human rights. Humphrey was one of the guiding lights that brought the Democratic Party out of the racism and divisiveness that the Southern D's, (who are now the Southern R's after the defections), had imposed upon the nation.

The single best thing about Humphrey, is that he never gave up trying to find ways to make peoples lives better.

As for the riots, which helped propel Nixon forward on a "law and order" platform, they were the fault of Daley and the Chicago PD hierarchy. Daley was a mean SOB, and he had no problem allowing things to happen that proved violent, if he felt it would benefit him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. You ought to make that an entirely seperate post! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old Codger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
21. you bet
I remember, I voted for Humphry and when my friends voted for tricky dicky I warned them to hold on to their asses as they were in for a hell of a ride, and I was sure right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC