Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I think a woman should be VP

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Dying Eagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 07:10 PM
Original message
I think a woman should be VP
Here's my logic. I think most all woman, even the upper-middle class woman who's husband's will vote Repuke will secretly vote for Kerry. If any one candidate can secure the entire womans vote its a done deal. Kerry can attack more on the hard issues like economy, national security, ect. while the VP can talk more social issues (motherly feel). Lastly, Chaney is such a old bigot that he will surly say something stupid to expose himself as the bigot he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MikeG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. I agree - Nancy Pelosi.
She won my heart when she ridiculed the Bush and Cheney joint testifying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
26. I think she said she wouldn't consider it... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ann Richards perhaps ?
;)

Southern Belle to boot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dying Eagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. sorry, not ann
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. I agree with a woman
But not in this election. I think that will take the focus away from the real issues-Like the policial corruption that is known as the Shrub Adminisration.

A woman Veep may turn off some people who are still undecided or leaning towards Shrub.
But it could turn some people on but I think this election is too important to have it turn out as a social-political event.

But I am for a woman VEEP and someday hopefully a woman PREZ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. After living through the Ferroro disaster
I disagree. I think the male candidates in this election are more viable. I never want to pick a VP just because she's a woman. Pick a candidate that is strongest. Consider the women's vote but don't pick someone less qualified than other candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. I agree
I was so excited when Geraldine Ferrara (sp?) was chosen as a vice-presidential candidate. I voted for her with pleasure.

But the most important thing to me today is getting rid of Bush and I think the best choices today are male.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. lets keep this in mind
which could make a difference.

WHY SINGLE WOMEN MUST VOTE
Ruth Rosen, San Francisco Chronicle

Unmarried women are the demographic-swing group that could decide a close election, oust President Bush and alter the political landscape in Congress.
*In Election 2004:

www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=17862 -
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Dying Eagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. u read way too much in my post
Edited on Sat Apr-03-04 07:42 PM by WI for Kerry
I didn't say that all woman would fall in line. I said that it would help get woman who would not normally vote our way. I also did not say that the VP would not address the hard issues. i just think that woman have a warmer feel when speaking about social issues. Also, if i were sexist why would i want a woman in the second highest office in the nation. Stop trying to put words in my posts that are not there. It's rude.

P.s Why the love for Dick, He is the enemy you know! The point is he would say something sexist during the debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daveskilt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. but we pride ourselves on being better than the freepers and having facts
cheney hasnt done much bigoted to my knowledge. Is he a terrible greedy warmongering tool? yes. there is evidence to back that up. but bigot. maybe, I don't know.

also it is sexist and stereotyping to say you want a woman (would any one do?)and the reason being that she would " have a warmer feel when speaking about social issues. "
wanting a woman in the second highest office in the land does not preclude the possibility that you have some sexist ideas. In fact your reasoning for why you want a woman VP (again - do you have anyone in mind or does it not matter as long as they fit the warm and happy stereotype you describe?) tends to suggest some sexism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dying Eagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. well.....
thats why i posted to see who people thought would make a great female VP. I am sorry if my post was taken as sexist. I am far from. I am looking forward to President Hillary in 2012. The social issues was one reason. I have too short of a attention span to list all the qualities of a Female VP. I also think that the Democrats are missing out on a BIG part of their base, Minority's and Woman. I really think the party needs to reconnect to them in this election. Even Chimp is trying to connect with them. (the illegal immigrant work permits)

P.S I guess the Freepers peg us as all "tree hugger's", so I am going to call all Repukes "Bigots" because it a fair chance that they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. yes, I think Carol Mosley Braun would be a good choice n/t
Edited on Sat Apr-03-04 07:38 PM by G_j
edit. name mix up :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sulldogg Donating Member (219 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. How about Carol?
is that her sister?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. yes my brain's not working
on all cylinders.. Carol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daveskilt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Carol was probably the most qualified for the nomination
Edited on Sat Apr-03-04 07:45 PM by daveskilt
and would have made (IMO) the best president. but she was not the best for the nom because this is america and in america there is no way in my lifetime that the chuckleheads in at least 2/3rds of the states would even think about voting for anything but a white christian man - put a white male semi retarded, odious, blob of turdlike pure evil up against a highly qualified, responsible, intelligent, african american woman and the white guy will win.

now if helen mosely braun (whoever that is) is a white guy maybe you're right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. LOL
I have no idea where I got "Helen" from. Strangely enough, I tried googling the name and came up with two references that seemed to be referring to the same person we are talking about. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daveskilt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. hey I do the same thing all the time. I got my brothers name wrong once
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
22. if she lost in Illinois against an unpopular opponent
I do see any benefit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #7
29. No way!
Edited on Sun Apr-04-04 11:15 AM by zulchzulu
CMB has so much dirt on her from her stint serving as Senator in Illinois. She got a free pass since her candidacy never took off in the primaries. Ask anyone from Illinois about her if you want to see someone's face turn red with anger.

She would have to drop out; it would be Kerry's Eagleton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Katts Meow Donating Member (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
11. Do you have any qualified woman VP in mind?
I don't think it matters to those already decided on Kerry. The VP choice might turn a few swing voters, I guess it would.

I think a woman VP would cut both ways. It would gain some and lose some. Would be interesting to see some demographics on that. I suspect it would lose more than gain, but I'd hate to take a guess on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #11
27. Mary Landrieu...
Hillary is very qualified, but I don't think she would help in the ticket at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dying Eagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. I guess we would lose some...
Edited on Sat Apr-03-04 07:39 PM by WI for Kerry
I think we would lose some Mid-west Dem's. I am from WI and even most the dems can be a little redneck sometimes. This may not be the year to try it out. I tell you what I am getting tired of Old, White Men running everything in this country. and I'm white :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
19. I personally don't care
Edited on Sat Apr-03-04 08:10 PM by fujiyama
one way or the other. I just don't know of any female politicians that would definetely or almost definetely deliver a state. I would prefer a VP that is strong on national security because that is really where Kerry is still getting beat. I personally can't really think of any. Perhaps Diane Fienstien, but she's from CA, a state we shouldn't have much trouble with, she's too much of DINO for my tastes, and her gun control stances would kill us just about everywhere outside of the northeast (and possibly hurt us in some states in tha region as well). Boxer and Pelosi would be great, but are not realistic options. Another interesting option might be Debbie Stabenow of MI. She hasn't served a whole term there though, and she would likely help deliver MI, a state we need to win, but one which had a gap that has begun to close.

The only viable female VP candidate I can think of is Mary Landrieu. I don't know how popular she is in LA, and whether she can likely deliver the state.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcuno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
20. Normally I would agree with you but this time I do not.
This is like no election I've ever seen and there will be great emphasis on national security. It has hurt our cause tremendously to have an incompetent ideologue who is also a woman charged with advising the POTUS on national security.

The damage that has been done is so immense that I now believe that I will never see a woman POTUS in my lifetime. I think that Kerry should choose a highly regarded military MAN for the position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dying Eagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. like General Clark
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
23. It might be a good idea, but there are simply no good candidates
If Landrieu was more liberal she might qualify, but otherwise every other candidate is simply far too polarzing or too easy to attack. Barbara Boxer may be awesome for California, but can you imagine her trying to run nationwide? And don't even get me started on Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowdawgdem Donating Member (972 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 05:36 AM
Response to Original message
25. It would be super to have a woman vp
Risky, yes. But in all, I believe it would bring in votes. It's really sad that the qualified people are considered "too" something, and that no one can think of any qualified women who are up to the job. In a perfect world, Mosely-Braun would be ideal because she would bring in the black community's vote as well as motivating women all across the class and ethnic lines. Plus she stuck out the debates, and has a good, solid temperament - nothing whiny or crybaby, and she is extremely likable and outgoing. I know very little about Landrieu, but Kerry didn't seem all that comfortable with her in the few photos I've seen. In the end, I think he should pick somebody he is comfortable with. What I like about Ann Richards is that she has a good sense of humor, and people enjoy her speeches for that reason. But there are other possibilities out there- and maybe we'll just have to settle for Wes in a dress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
28. Why settle for VP?
I want a woman for president. Let's see if we're evolved enough by 2008 or 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC