Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How would YOU advise Senator Obama?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
noel711 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:58 PM
Original message
How would YOU advise Senator Obama?
Enough with the 'clever' pundits and talking heads.. what would real people say?

If I was a close advisor, here is my view:

First, keep handy two opposites: keep your cool sense of humor, BUT get serious! Stern!
If Senator Clinton can get all up in your face with "Shame on you Barak Obama!"
You take her to task: "Mrs. Clinton, we are better than that! TReating one another
as if we are children! Leadership demands dignity! REfrain from being the school marm!
You're better than that!" (I know this is a John Edwards line, but you've borrowed
John's stuff before; keep it up. Better you use his lines than your worthy opponant.)

Next, face the 'name' situation head on. I've had several 'church ladies' confront me with
the "he's got a Muslim name!" meme. When they say that to me, I say: "My middle name is Lee,
but I'm no man!" And they laugh.
You may add on: "We know many hispanic citizens who are named 'Jesus,' but that don't make them
the Messiah!" And about your first name (this will get the Bible thumpers good..)..
"The name "Barak" is biblical, check out Judges, chapter 4. Barak was a Hebrew warrior
who led the people into military victory and peace.. and I would love to do that for you
all, lead you into victory in the name of the Lord! The name Hussein means "handsome one."
And I do all right with that!" Then smile that shy grin. Don't be afraid to talk about yourself.
Your worthy opponant talks about herself very much...

Add the theme of 'trust' to your 'hope' message. Who do the American people trust? Can you trust a leader who would do or say anything to win? Do anything to win? Would that mean that after she won, she would do anything..? The political leadership of 'bullying'? Haven't we had 8 years of that? How's that working for us? Who do you trust? Do you trust your children and their future, to a leader who thinks its all about her, and her experience, and her past, and her contacts, and her political games that break the kneecaps of those who stand in her way? Is that what you want your children to think that expresses leadership? No more bullies in WAshington.

You're heading into Pennsylvania, and get there NOW! Be a constant presence, get out there....
Philadelphia is ripe for the picking, even tho Governor Rendell (who is wavering!) and Mayor Nutter support your worthy opponant. Philly has a rich history, with a varied AFrican American population, many colleges and universities, a 'latte' crowd, and many immigrants. It's the Cradle of Liberty, and you could build on that meme. If you can, host a rally in Independence Square, pass out flags to all the children, let one of Philly's amazing gospel choirs pump up the crowd, concentrate on the freedom theme that says: "Here, in Philadelphia, in Pennsylvania, in the United States of America, here anything is possible.. millions came thru Philly from the very beginning, looking for the promised land... immigrants, and indentured servants, the wealthy and the enslaved, the impoverished and the conniving, but the promise is still here. (point to the crowds) YOU are the promise!" There's also a rich heritage of churches, do a church pilgrimage tour, and gather up the harvest.

The suburbs of Philly were once republican country, but no more, they're turning purple. Push the boundaries. Work the Blue Collar belt of the Lehigh VAlley, the cities of Wilkes Barre, and Scranton, hit the coal mining regions that are still hurting from economic collapse, they need hope desperately, without false promises, or snide remarks. These cities were devastated with the loss of jobs, and have become a settling place for Puerto Rican immigrants; this has led to conflicts, but point to the promise.. the Cradle of Liberty. Address the immigrant issue head on: most of us are the result of immigrants who came here (or who were brought here!)... and they made a life with hope, and promise of freedom...

There are many republicans in Pennsylvania, but they are 'old school,' not 'neo-cons,' but traditionalists, who are patriotic in the old sense, who center their lives on family, church, community, and responsibility. I don't know when the republicans claimed this as their description, but we need to snatch that back fast. Appeal to their sense of fair-play, pass out the flags, and at every rally, pledge allegiance to the flag, and be very obvious about putting your hand on your heart (Make sure the press gets those pictures on the front pages of the local newspapers.. that'll squash another internet rumor.)

When Geo. W. Bush blew thru here in 2000, and 2004, he hit every Wal-Mart parking lot with a rally, drank coffee in every rural diner, took off his jacket and tie, rolled up his sleeves, and slapped a lot of folks on the back. The people's response? "I might not like everything he's done, but he's a lot like me. That's ok." Get the point?

Don't buy into the 'conventional' wisdom that says all women flock to your worthy opponant. That's tripe. REal feminists know they have brains, and seek out someone they trust. Remember that old television game show "Who Do you Trust?" Isn't that what leadership should be about? Trust?

Talk to your worthy opponant openly: Ask her where are her tax returns. Ask her if she has released to the public her papers during her husband's tenure in the White House. Ask her if her thirst for leadership is about what she wants to do, or if she wants to challenge them to leadership? Is it really only about Her?

And tell your daughters, Sasha and Melea, that when you get to the White House, they can have that longed for dog...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Gore1FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'd tell him to start going after McCain
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. Excellent post - thanks for the wealth of local data
I'm sure with the time between now and the PA election he can put this to good use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. focus on electability in the GE
emphasize he's done better against McCain in polls so far; get some data to back that up in purple states (not just national polls).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. The best advice I could give would be to learn to control the newscycle
Surrogettes everywhere, any MSM outlet that wants Democratic representatives to fill air time.

People representative of the very voting blocks Obama needs to make inroads with, older women, hispanics, middle aged white men etcetera, all working off a small set of talking points that change depending on the issues Obama's campaign most wants to focus on.

They dont have to be politicians (think Ms. Rice on National Security), just educated and comfortable talking in front of cameras, and able to stand their ground should they get paired by a network against either a Clinton supporter or a Republican.

The reason I think this is important is that its not uncommon for a day to go by where I will see several Hillary supporters on most every news channel, but its a rare day I see more than 1 or 2 segments with an Obama representative.

That gives Hillary far too much uncontested free airtime, and the MSM usually lobs them softballs.

That has to stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Excellent points. Agree absolutely! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #4
18. Yep--and now the MSM is picking up the Hillary campaign memes
about Obama and perpetuating them as unchallenged fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. Turn the tables on her and summon her for another clarifying debate or two.
**Shame on you Hillary.** Meet me in Pennslvania right now!

Time to ruthlessly expose her tactics and kill off some controversies for good. Kill em, bury them and drive a stake through em. It's absolutely vital that he does. Immediately, if not sooner.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. I would have him go after her experience argument as much as he can
He started to today. But he should go after her experience. Start asking the important questions that nobody is asking...what eexperience? How exactly have you been tested in crisis?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InAbLuEsTaTe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. Anyone but HIllary for VP or you will lose a sh*tload of votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
psychopomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
9. It is time to talk about the kind of America his open government would engender
He needs to make the case for a new vision of government based on the open-government principles that he has already endorsed but not explicitly laid out for the public.

In other words, at this stage of the primary season his campaign would benefit greatly by explaining how this vision of open government has the potential to weed out corruption and make citizens much more an informed part of the process of what takes place in their government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lmbradford Donating Member (124 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #9
19. I agree
I started this campaign so excited to be voting for HRC. I am a feminist and I believed that we finally had a viable candidate running that was a woman. Since I researched the candidates and paid attention to what they were saying and doing, it started to dawn on me that I couldn't in good conscience vote for her. Obama sold me when he spoke about open government. Knowing that he cares what I think and what I say and will take my opinion into account sold him for me as a candidate. Now I simply adore the man.....We the people matter......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
10. Speak about Clinton and McCain together - talk about how they're the same.
He can't go too negative, but it will be effective if he constantly reminds everyone how similar Clinton and McCain really are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. I'd tell him to quit while he's ahead
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDoorbellRang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
12. I'd clear up that NAFTA bullshit ASAP
A) point out the timing
B) point out first story was of staffer meeting in Canada, which we denied, not knowing what the heck they were talking about.
C) then story was changed to Goolsbee in Chicago, which we admitted once we knew what they were referring to, but this got spun as some sort coverup on our part
D) memo was paraphrased as saying "it's all campaign rhetoric." Hand them complete memo and point out that all the news sources only showed first paragraph.
E) point out second paragraph and ask why this all wasn't paraphrased as not wanting to opt out of NAFTA but wanted to redo protections for workers and environment, WHICH IS WHAT HE'S BEEN SAYING ALL ALONG.
F) mention that it's odd: McCain wants NAFTA to stay as it is; and Clinton's been for it until she started running for president, then she decided maybe it wasn't so great after all. But somehow the only candidate who's had the best position on this all along gets smeared on this the day before the primary in a state hurting from it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. I'd point out that Hillary was actually the one lying about NAFTA /Canada--and make
an ad about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMatt Donating Member (523 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
13. Agree completely with your post, firm, and regain the message that resonates
With a patriotic twist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
14. Rove her. Hit her on her perceived strength--her self-proclaimed
toughness and national security/foreign policy creds. See if someone has a tape or you-tube of the conference call where her advisors could not name a single foreign policy crisis she has ever faced--that long pause ("long enough to knit a sweater") would make a fucking DEVASTATING ad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. yup, she had no security clearance back in the day, and didn't bother reading NIE before Iraq vote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
15. Quit while you are ahead.
LOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lmbradford Donating Member (124 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
17. I'd say .....
She is a "behind closed doors" candidate. If she can't pass her health care plan when her husband is president and there is a democratic congress how in the world does she propose to do it now? Her "behind closed door" meetings and negotiations and tactics only served to alienate all the parties involved and she failed......

She failed with her judgment on the Iraq War Vote and she failed on the Iran Resolution.....

As far as experience goes, by her standards, Laura Bush could serve a term as senator and have unbelievable foreign policy experience. Does this sound like someone with the judgment to lead this country?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
20. Attack Clinton For Abandoning So Many States & Not Bothering To Show Up & Stump
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDoorbellRang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. Heck, he could put together an ad of her dissing the states
that didn't support her. He'd have enough footage to do several, I bet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. exactly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RememberWellstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
23. He's a wuss at heart
He will do nothing but re-read his stump speech...send his wife to be ashamed of the nation and end up losing the primary. Just a guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
24. Obama sounded like a schoolmarm scolding low income people about their eating habits
Clinton has no monopoly on that. He really ought to quit it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
26. No Nukes! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC