Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pennsylvania: Far from a treasure trove of delegates for Hillary

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 09:29 AM
Original message
Pennsylvania: Far from a treasure trove of delegates for Hillary
This is the next state that Hillary supporters like to talk about and look at, but frankly, even if Hillary's favored, it's not going to give her a huge boost. In fact, Obama could very well cancel out Pennsylvania's margin with Wyoming!

Let's look at each district. Pennsylvania has 103 delegates allocated by district and 55 at large.:

PA-1: 7 delegates. Pretty damn close to majority black but Hillary should do well among whites. Obama is still certain to win, but whether he gets 4 or 5 delegates is a turnout battle. I'll be kind to Hillary and assume it's 4-3 Obama.
PA-2: 9 delegates. 61% black, and the whites here are much more unfriendly to Hillary. This district is simply brutal for her. 7-2 Obama.
PA-3: 5 delegates. This is a good district for Hillary. 3-2 Hillary.
PA-4: 5 delegates. Another good district for Hillary. 3-2 Hillary.
PA-5: 4 delegates. Hillary should win most of the district, but she has a severe problem with it containing Penn State. No one will win enough to win more than 2 delegates apeice.
PA-6: 6 delegates. The parts of this district that demographically favor Obama vote Democratic. The parts that demographically favor Hillary vote Republican. Obama stands a damn good shot of doing well enough to win 4 delegates to her 2, but I'll be generous and call it a tie.
PA-7: 7 delegates. Very good district for Obama. 4-3 Obama.
PA-8: 7 delegates. Same deal. 4-3 Obama.
PA-9: 3 delegates. This is a good district for Hillary, but with 3 delegates margin doesn't matter. 2-1 Hillary.
PA-10: 4 delegates. Can Hillary break 62.5% here? It's worth noting that she only barely got around that in the parts of New York bordering the district where she got a bounce no doubt. But in this I'm always giving her the benefit of the doubt. 3-1 Hillary.
PA-11: 5 delegates. Good territory for Hillary. 3-2 Hillary.
PA-12: 5 delegates. Also good territory for Hillary. 3-2 Hillary.
PA-13: 7 delegates. This district isn't overwhelmingly favorable to Obama, but it's tough to see how he loses. 4-3 Obama.
PA-14: 7 delegates. This is a tossup. Almost 24% black, but Hillary should do very well among whites. Frankly you might as well flip a coin to see how it votes, but I'm being kind to Hillary. 4-3 Hillary.
PA-15: 5 delegates. This district is changing, but still good for Hillary at this moment. 3-2 Hillary.
PA-16: 4 delegates. Hillary favored probably, but it's only 4 delegates. It'll split.
PA-17: 4 delegates. This is probably the blackest rural district outside of the south. It's 12.4% black, and the whites are mostly Republican, so the percentage of the black voters in the primary is larger. Flip a coin to see who wins, but it really doesn't matter due to the even number of delegates.
PA-18: 5 delegates. I could see a case for Obama here, but Hillary still favored. 3-2 Hillary.
PA-19: 4 delegates. Another 4 delegate district with 2 apeice.

Total? 52 delegates for Hillary and 51 for Obama. Now the 55 at large. I'm going to continue being generous to Hillary and assume she has a 10 point victory. 55% gives her 30 delegates to Obama's 25. That's a total victory over Obama of 6 delegates.

Put simply, don't count on PA to put a massive dent in Obama's lead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. ANd her lead is single digits with 6 weeks of campaigning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
28. Her lead is 15 points.... and growing daily. Expect a 70/30 blowout for Hilly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #28
31. Anything less would be a step away from the nomination--just like March 4 was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #28
34. You can't honestly believe that can you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. Yes. I don't have false hopes....like so many cultists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. 70-30 will never happen in a million years.
Clinton could very well win Pennsylvania. She might even win by a wide margin, although I doubt it. But she absolutely won't win it 70-30. When you make such an outlandish prediction you lose all credibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. How about this.... I secretly think she'll win 80 to his 17-18
Rezko trial will be in full swing.... he may miss a few days of campaigning to appear in court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DLnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #38
41. Really? Even though it has been reported REPEATEDLY that the trial does not
involve Obama in any way? I understand being optimistic. But no candidate has won anything by anything like 80% since these primaries began, as far as I know. Still, to be fair, nothing is impossible. Highly unlikely, yes, but strictly speaking, not impossible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 03:37 AM
Response to Reply #38
43. The attacks on Obama over Rezko are as pathetic as Ken Starr's actions
Edited on Fri Mar-07-08 03:37 AM by ButterflyBlood
And just as despicable. Any attempt to link Obama to Rezko's criminal actions is about as valid and logic-based as the 8 year witchhunt the Repukes did over the Clintons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hogwyld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #43
50. Of course, we political junkies know this
But I suspect Hillary will put out a lot of negative ads on this that the average voter will just eat up without thought. Look what happened in Ohio with the NAFTA thing and the 3am thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #38
49. Perhaps Hillary will have to revisit Whitewater?
Moron. It is about as likely. It is absolutely disgusting that Hilbots have become Rovians. It is amazing that I now have to choose between vacuous "cultists" and truly slime eating, shit slinging Hilbot Rovians.

I am forced to side with the cultists. Hillary has truly crossed the line into the dark side of self-aggrandizement and a scorched earth campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SKKY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #38
59. Again, you're spewing more garbage...
...he has not be named as a potential witness, and Patrick Fitzgerald (Sound familiar?) has already looked at Obamas involvement into this Rezko nonsense. His verdict? Nada. Nothing. Zilch. Obama did nothing wrong, did nothing illegal. Next?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #59
61. lol. We shall see. I *Know* That Obama is a dirty Chicago politician.
The question is whether he will be caught.... and I think he will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SKKY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #61
62. Are you going to provide any *proof*, or just keep spewing garbage?
We'd all like to see some facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #28
56. you just don't accept reality until it runs you over, do you?
Prepare to be trampled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #56
57. lol to the max!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SKKY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #28
58. And what poll are you looking at? Every one I've seen is contradictory to what...
...you're saying here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #58
63. I'm looking at the people around me here on the ground.
All Hilly supporters are firm. Obama supporters are waffling... and the undecideds are going to break for Hill.
MASSIVE blowout on the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SKKY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #63
64. I wish I could have some of what you're having...
...on 2nd thought, perhaps not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemzRock Donating Member (824 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. I don't think she's going after a huge increase in delegates now...
I think she is going for a brokered convention - with all the big states on her side, it may be a good argument for her.

Can't win the GE without those big states guys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellerpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Can't win those big states with the independents
voting for anyone besides Hillary, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Primary victories don't equal GE victories
Hillary polls much worse against McCain. That's the issue. Plus some of those big states (California, New York) aren't going to vote for McCain in any circumstance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. Not much worse
SurveyUSA's maps have her with only four fewer EV's than Obama in matchups with McCain. However, I think Hillary would spur more Republican turnout than Obama would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. I'm not buying those
It appears they just polled the entire country and took the subsample from each state rather than poll each state with a decent sample separately. The fact that Obama wins North Dakota is enough proof of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #17
26. DIDN'T CLINTON FAIL TO FILE A FULL SLATE OF DELEGATES?
Has Clinton ever corrected this, or does she go into PA without full slate?

Daily Kos: UPDATE: Clinton Fails to File Full Delegate Slate in ...Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign failed to file a full slate of ...... Don't even bother sending in delegates. Disenfranchise the voter as much as ...
www.dailykos.com/story/2008/2/19/102051/480/77/459625 - 206k - Cached - Similar pages

Daily Kos: Clinton won't field full PA delegate slate
This at a time when Clinton's campaign, like Barack Obama's - which did file a full slate in the state - hoards delegates like diamonds. Pennsylvania voters ...
www.dailykos.com/story/2008/2/19/12534/2925/1008/459687
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. Clinton short about 10 percent of slate of delegates???????
Tue, Feb. 19, 2008


John Baer: How Pa. extension benefited Clinton

...It appears Clinton came up 10 or 11 candidates short across a number of congressional districts, including two in Philadelphia.

That's close to 10 percent of the 103 delegates to be decided by voters.

It appears the shortage would've been double that if Rendell hadn't extended last week's candidate filing deadline by a day and a half, ostensibly due to bad weather.


http://www.philly.com/philly/hp/news_update/15759032.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thoughtcrime1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. He'd win the big states just as well or better vs. McCain
He may also bring in smaller purple states, where Hillary would not. The difference in opponent would produce different results, not sure why some can't see that. I cannot be convinced that he'd lose CA, NY, MA, NJ. She wouldn't necessarily win OH in the GE or FL. He matches up better with McCain in the GE, no question. With the war being so unpopular, and McCain representing the continuation of Bush policy, Obama provides the perfect contrast as someone who had the foresight to be against it from the start. Hillary would lose any BS "experience" contest vs. McCain just as Obama would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
25. hilary can eat dust...
we'll see how far she takes the Dem party down with bottom feeding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
39. The problem with that analysis is that
almost all of those big states that Hillary won are very blue states that Obama would win in the general anyway even though he lost in the primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 04:47 AM
Response to Reply #39
47. Exactly.
Is Hillary going to seriously try to argue that we have to nominate her to stop McCain from winning New York?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
4. I am PA-2!! Hillary will be slaughtered here!
This is PA-2

-Large African American neighborhoods: most of West Philly, much of North Philly, Gray's Ferry, etc.
-HUGE Youth vote: UPenn, Drexel, USP, etc.
-And the rest: Highly educated white folks and extreme liberals

PA-1 is admittedly more of a concern because it includes working class areas in South Philly and NE Philly. But it DOES include parts of W. Philly, including a ward that belongs to my neighborhood group. So we'll be focusing heavily on voter reg there. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Gobama!

GOTV in your district!! :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
23. I hope you work well on Obama's GOTV
You got 7 weeks to get as many registered as possible. Hopefully you can pull through for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #23
52. We've actually got 18 days to get people registered.
But we're on it. There are voter registration events scheduled across the city. I'm going to one today (in Philly's most crucial ward in PA-1) and another tomorrow (back in the good ol' PA-2).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
7. Most of PA is Appalachian, and those folks don't vote
for Obama. In those districts, she'll get 3-1 splits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmperorHasNoClothes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
8. B-but... I read on DU that she would net 100 delegates in PA!
Could they have been lying? :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
9. PA 6-8 and 13
I live in District 8, and I am very familiar with the Philly 'burbs. Clinton maintains a very strong presence here, but there are considerable fertile fields for Obama to develop. The divisions between non-Black "Beer voters" and "Wine voters" are likely to be more clearly visible than in most states.

Black Philadelphia is an African-American cultural and intellectual center. They are fiercely independent-minded but/and will almost surely go 88%-12% for Obama, the usual kind of split we've seen in races between a black and a white Democrat. Several A-A leaders have already endorsed Hillary, and a large number also want to see a C-O or O-C "dream team" no matter what side they are on. The Blacks, at least the ones me and my family know, are quite fond of BOTH the candidates. It's a win-win situation for them, no matter who wins.

The white Democrats here are extremely strong Clinton supporters. As Tweety, also a Pennsylvanian, is so fond of saying, Pennsylvania is a big "Beer" state -- though we also have the second or third largest wine production in the USA. Make of that what you will!

So in 6-8 and 13, I'd be inclined to reverse your estimates, though 6 (Chester county) will be stronger for Obama and 8 (Bucks county) stronger for Hillary. 13 (Montgomery county) is probably Obama's best, with working-class blacks AND affluent whites, though the large Jewish community in 13 will vote strongly for Hillary.

But the center of the state is incredibly racist, much more so than in most of the South (where that stereotype no longer holds strongly), even the Democrats, though they also hate Hillary, so that one is tough to say. I think in the general election, McCain will get those districts without breaking a sweat.

I'd say that 11 and 15 will be pretty good for Obama, and 2 will be much better for Hillary than you estimate. There are a lot of Black folks and several colleges in 11 and 15 (Allentown), and 2 is the working-class White Northeast and Black North Philadelphia; the white area is already strongly organized because of city politics, but the black area is extremely poor and notoriously difficult to organize, though it has a large community activist presence. Perhaps Team Obama can turn its political participation around. I think it will be 5-4 for Obama, possibly 6-3, but 7-2 might be asking too much, even with a flaccid effort from Hillary.

I am much less familiar with the Pittsburgh area. It is somewhat similar to Ohio, though the "Af-Am" population is smaller. None the less, there are big colleges (for instance, CMU) and other golden opportunities waiting for Obama. And if Obama wins or puts up a strong fight, it will be on the strength of his organization's planning and recruitment, which has been superb.

For a more detailed analysis, I'd have to spend several hours with voting and population maps. And I may do just that, so I may come to revise my ideas, which have been formed by 30 years of observing PA politics, but which are still quite imperfect, and do not take recent voting into account. (I was inactive in ground-level politics in 2004 and 2006 due to family matters -- DU was my political arena.) For example, a lot of Latinos have moved into Allentown since 1990, and there has been a strong Black presence forming in the suburbs. There is also a huge amount of anti-Latino racism taking root in the northern (White) parts of 6, 8, 12, 16, and all of 11 and 15, so expect immigration issues to "inform the conversation".

But Pennsylvania will indeed put a significant dent in Obama's lead unless Obama fields a much stronger ground organization than Hillary -- and that's one of the areas that Hillary has been concentrating on lately. The competition will first have to be waged organizationally. This is clearly Team Obama's strong suit. But also note, there will be enough time for the ebb and flow of news to affect both candidates much more strongly than any time previously, and that will be a complete crapshoot unless the press decides to stake out another position.

It is a good thing that we've got Annenberg and Quinnipiac around -- there will be no lack of analysis.

And we've got seven weeks.

Excellent thread; thanks for posting it!

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. I see no way PA-2 can be only 5-4
To get 6 delegates Obama needs only about 61%, which is actually the black population of the district. Holding Obama to only 5 delegates would require that either A LOT of blacks stay home or the whites vote for Hillary big time, which in PA-2 is unlikely, the whites favor Obama unlike PA-1.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
10. Thanks and I'd like to add if they "Replay" Florida and Michigan:
She will win Florida but resoundly lose Michigan. I doubt she will make up delegates if they rerun these two states.

BTW Michigan is my home state and I have to date been denied the right to vote for the candidate of my choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kermit77 Donating Member (160 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. If she doesn't steal PA like she stole Harlem
Let's hope that the Clintons don't steal PA like they stole Harlem. Remember in some Harlem districts they reported zero votes for Obama. We know that was a total fraud. Obama needs to get poll monitors in Pennsylvania on election day.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Those were unofficial results
reported to the media, and weren't the official tallies used to calculate delegates.

Still shifty, but she didn't steal delegates from Harlem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimGinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
14. I've Been Saying For A While PA Will Be More Of A Delegate Split Than A Big Win For HRC
Edited on Thu Mar-06-08 11:01 AM by JimGinPA
HRC's supporters at DU pay too much attention to Tweety & a lot of the other M$M pundits who think PA is going to somehow going to be an easy win for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. JimGinPA, which CD are you in? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimGinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #15
32. Good Ole Big Red #16
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ExFreeper4Obama Donating Member (122 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
19. This is exactly what I've been saying that past 2 days
Clinton will net a paltry 5 delegates from March 4. Obama will crush Clinton in Wyoming and Mississipi erasing her gains made on March 4 and then some. Even if Clinton wins PA by a good amount, she will be back to where she war before March 4 and the math will be even tougher. Its over for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. And 2 weeks after PA, we have NC
The last big state and Obama is favored. Hillary has a few states where she's favored after that (most notably West Virginia and Kentucky) but so does Obama. She might gain a few delegates on him, but she's not going to get anywhere near his lead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
21. He could very well win Penn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #21
29. 'Cause of Philly and all the big
guns are going to be out campaigning for him 'cause it's crunch time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smalll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
22. "Obama could very well cancel out Pennsylvania's margin with Wyoming!"
And you don't see anything wrong with this? What ever happened to one person, one vote? What ever happened to DEMOCRACY?

You Obamatrons aren't 21st century, you're 18th century! Rotten boroughs for a new millenium!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. The system was JUST FINE with you when Bill was winning in '92 and '96, I bet.....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neverforget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #22
33. Is Hillary giving up the Nevada Caucus votes? Didn't think so.
Quit bitching and get out the vote for your candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ORDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
30. Yeah, but you're preachin' to the choir here on DU (mostly). The Hillbots
have stuffed cotton in their ears and have the blinders on, so they don't believe it. And they call Obama supporters deluded????

ROTFLMAO

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 03:39 AM
Response to Reply #30
44. I figure I'll give numbers to their nothing
So far I have yet to see a Hillary supporter outline a scenario where she mathematically can win the nomination. All I've seen is vague talk about how they have faith and she can do it, Yes She Can!

And they accuse Obama of speaking only in platitudes with no substance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
35. So, you obamanots have proved our point....This primary is all
about RACE! WOW and us hrc supporters have been right all along and we were right about the following too....
These last 60 days have been the most hateful.Gee, I wonder - who started that ball rolling? Who was it that got us to stop fighting the Bush bastards so we could fight each other? Who gained power by splitting the party and getting Democrats to fight Democrats?

The answer to all three questions are obama and his campaign......

We had the White House won about 90 days ago, but a fresh-faced newcomer might've gotten an itch for power. But we had this race won, and Obama stepped in "to unite us." uh huh Look at us now..It is come down on the obamna side about RACE!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blondiegrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
40. Shhhhh! Let them live in their little world of denial for a bit longer.
In a few months, the reality will hit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BringBigDogBack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:44 AM
Response to Original message
42. kicking for a reality check.
thanks for the post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 03:43 AM
Response to Original message
45. All of this first class district by districtt analysis - is this still DU?
Just to put PA in perspective Obama has picked up 11 Superdelegates this week alone.

I am bookkeeping this thank you so much
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 04:25 AM
Response to Reply #45
46. I plan on doing one of these for every upcoming state actually
Stay tuned...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. where do you find the source material for district by district
analysis?

Here is an interesting question?

What are the breakdowns of the remaining districts, how many 2,3,4,5,6,7,8 delegate districts are there left?

If all of the 2 districts split 1-1 and the 3 districts split 2-1 etc. etc. If she even took all of the remaining big districts by 70% how many delegates could she get back. I am guessing it would be very few.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #48
53. I use the census for demographic stats
You can look up district info here: fastfacts.census.gov/

And this site for the number of delegates: www.thegreenpapers.com

There are no more 2 delegate districts, and there was only one total, one in Texas (which bases its numbers off state senate districts, not congressional)

I also believe this one in PA is the last 3 delegate district. Most in North Carolina are 5 or 6 (there is one 4 and one 8), Indiana has one 6, three 4 and four 5. Oregon has three 6, one 5 and one 8. West Virginia's are all 6. Kentucky has two 4, two 5, one 6 and one 7. Puerto Rico uses districts based on their legislature, and all are 4 except for one 5. Montana and South Dakota are at large so district figures are meaningless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #53
55. i couldn't find anything on the site that went to how many delegates there are per district
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 02:44 AM
Response to Reply #55
65. Scroll about halfway down the front page
There's a box with two sections in it, one that says "Democratic Presidential Nominating Process" and "Republican Presidential Nominating Process". All the states are listed under each section. Just click on the state you want under "Democratic Presidential Nominating Process" and at it has all the info near the bottom of the page just above the links section.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
not_too_L8 Donating Member (757 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
51. Nice post! can i link to this?....K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #51
54. Go ahead
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InAbLuEsTaTe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
60. The math is not to figure out. Hillary has lost and the longer she stays in . . .
the harder it will be for us to win in November. It's so obvious she's already campaigning for 2012 after she tarnishes Obama in hope he'll lose. Got bad news for you Hillary: ain't gonna happen. Obama can take all the slings and arrows you got. The American people can see through your lies and deception, just as they will see through the Swiftboaters you'll unleash on him after you lose the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 02:48 AM
Response to Original message
66. PA 6 here, it's going Obama
Even the Republicans out there are warming to Obama. If it is Hillary, the district will go to McLame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC