Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton's "Big State" Myth: Why Barack Obama Remains the Most Electable Democrat This Fall

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:54 AM
Original message
Clinton's "Big State" Myth: Why Barack Obama Remains the Most Electable Democrat This Fall
Posted March 5, 2008 | 05:48 PM (EST)

The Clinton Campaign's post March 4th message is to forget about the delegate count and nominate Hillary because she can win the big states Democrats need in November. That argument simply doesn't hold up to scrutiny. Here's why:

1) Most of the "Big States" she has won are not battleground states in the fall. New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts and California are solid blue states where Obama would do as well or better than Clinton in a general election against McCain.

2) Of the states she's won so far, the big exception to this rule is Ohio. Ohio is in fact a critical battleground state where Hillary has demonstrated that she has a leg up among lower income whites and older voters. But the polling also shows that in a general election, Barack offsets this advantage in Ohio among young voters and college-educated independents. In a McCain-Clinton match up the later group could gravitate heavily to McCain in Ohio.

In an Ohio general election, Obama's ability to attract independents and mobilize young and minority voters will trump Clinton's advantages among non-college whites -- a group that will break heavily for either Barack or Hillary against the "free trade" McCain.

Just remember, in Ohio right now, "national security" is a job. The economy and trade -- not "national security" -- will almost certainly continue to be the overriding issues for non-college whites in Ohio this November.

Much more >>>

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-creamer/clintons-big-state-myt_b_90115.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. It puzzles me to why Hillary gave up the delegates in the fly-over states?
Did she think those delegates were not important? Did she not realize that the candidate with the most delegates would be the winner?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindMatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. No. It is DLC-think. That's the way their brains work
These are not especially bright people. They surround themselves with old-time, old-style insider politician who think exactly as they do. Immunity from any new ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. She's pursuing the same losing "blue states plus 1" strategy Gore and Kerry used.
It's predicated on the idea that we can't persuade independents or Republicans who don't already agree with us, so we have to just try and grab the tiny percentage of people in the middle who'll be comforted by as bland and formulaic a campaign as possible, and hope that that brings us to 270 electoral votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. they have this strategy that if you win x number of big delegate
states you don't have to worry about the rest. witness the post super tuesday debacle. they didn't have a strategy because they only budgeted and worked on that number of states. Fuck the rest. Win these, walk to the white house. that strategy has lost us a few. That is why dean wants to build organizations in all fifty states and why these dimwits with their cherry pick strategy want him out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. Of course it's a myth.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. And don't stop at assessing "electability:. To break the stalemate in Congress, we need
a candidate with "coat-tails", to help out Democrats running for Senate and House seats in "red" states.

What good would it do to have just the White House with the most divisive Democrat in memory as President? Most of HRC's big plans would go absolutely nowhere, just as they did under her husband.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I have a huge concern about that as well, but also that she can't win against McCain in the general
in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. A very good, straight-forward analysis n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. K & R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindMatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. And the other side of that coin is ...
What about the states that Obama won that Clinton didn't even care enough to contest seriously? How many of these can realistically go blue in November? The combination of Obama's freshness and Bush's legacy may be just enough to create the potential for a 35-state win.

Really folks. Wouldn't you feel a hell of a lot better going into the GE season knowing that we don't absolutely have to win both Ohio and Florida?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msallied Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
9. Ohio proved it had soured on Republicans back in 06
And I think they will continue to prove it by going Democrat this fall. I think we're looking at an Electoral landslide for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
12. Thank you for your educated analysis and your common sence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigbrother05 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
13. K and R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
14. k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC