|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
ProgressiveEconomist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 02:05 PM Original message |
How cd HRC POSSIBLY overcome Obama's 140+ lead? Simple: w net ***121*** tainted FL and MI |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 02:06 PM Response to Original message |
1. They will NOT be seated, as is. Dean assured it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goclark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 02:09 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. My TV did not get the message |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveEconomist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 02:15 PM Response to Reply #1 |
10. That's not what I heard Dean say on MSNBC Wednesday morning (or was it Thursday) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 02:07 PM Response to Original message |
2. Essentially, by stealing the nomination the way Bush stole the presidency. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveEconomist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 02:38 PM Response to Reply #2 |
20. Exactly. A Hilliary-dominated Credentials Committee decision = Bush V Gore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adoraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 02:08 PM Response to Original message |
3. no, just no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveEconomist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 02:19 PM Response to Reply #3 |
13. I heard Bill Nelson say on MSNBC that seating FL would "only" net HRC 38 votes: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thoughtcrime1984 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 02:08 PM Response to Original message |
4. Huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adoraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 02:08 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. thats because this is assuming Obama would get zero delegates in MI |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thoughtcrime1984 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 02:11 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. That could not, would not happen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveEconomist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 02:40 PM Response to Reply #9 |
21. It SHOULD not, MUST not, but could happen, jsut like Bush V Gore. See #10. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveEconomist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 03:26 PM Response to Reply #21 |
28. Kick! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 02:08 PM Response to Original message |
5. not going to happen esp in Michigan where Obama was not on th ballot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BringBigDogBack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 02:10 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Bingo. And to seat florida, you would have to seat them all, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dansolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 03:39 PM Response to Reply #8 |
32. No, the 38 delegate pickup in FL is about right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveEconomist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 04:01 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. Thank you. The way 105 pledged delegates wd go to HRC, and 67 to Obama, is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dansolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 09:00 PM Response to Reply #34 |
53. How does Edwards get delegates? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveEconomist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 05:27 PM Response to Reply #32 |
41. Kick! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveEconomist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 02:20 PM Response to Reply #5 |
15. Do me a favor: Just click this link (from the OP), read it, and reassess your comment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
housewolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 02:16 PM Response to Original message |
11. 2025 del count needed does not include FL & MI |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
housewolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 03:28 PM Response to Reply #11 |
29. The actual numbers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveEconomist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 03:38 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. IMO you are correct. Excluding MI and FL, the total is 4047, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 02:18 PM Response to Original message |
12. FL is realistic, even with a revote. MI is not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveEconomist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 02:33 PM Response to Reply #12 |
19. There may not BE any re-vote--Here's yesterday's Detroit Free Press editorial: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 02:43 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. The type of editorial no one would ever sign... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wileedog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 02:44 PM Response to Reply #19 |
24. What? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveEconomist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 06:12 PM Response to Reply #24 |
42. Kick! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
powergirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 04:27 PM Response to Reply #19 |
38. Soviet Union style voting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveEconomist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 12:19 AM Response to Reply #38 |
56. Kick! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveEconomist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-10-08 03:35 PM Response to Reply #56 |
63. Kick! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 02:20 PM Response to Original message |
14. So she can win the nomination only if nobody is running against her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveEconomist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 02:42 PM Response to Reply #14 |
22. And then, as pResident, she can put National Election Reform back on the agenda! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bill McBlueState (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 02:20 PM Response to Original message |
16. EVEN if this is true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveEconomist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 02:22 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. You may be right. But 20+ is not as insurmountable as 140+, is it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bill McBlueState (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 02:26 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. oh, definitely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveEconomist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 02:49 PM Response to Reply #18 |
26. IMO this is NOT an "extreme case"--this is what inertia on re-votes SURELY will bring. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dansolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 02:49 PM Response to Original message |
25. It is really only about half that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveEconomist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 02:58 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. What's your source for that opinion? And theGreenpapers omits 20 superdelegates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dansolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 03:36 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. The DNC won't seat them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveEconomist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 03:50 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. It's possible the Credentials Committee could award all "uncommitted" to Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hell-bent (593 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 04:06 PM Response to Original message |
35. The only thing "spurious" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveEconomist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 04:19 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. You seem to be making much of "spillover" from Super Tuesday ads aimed at AL, GA, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
powergirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
37. Isn't it true that if new primaries were held in Florida and Michigan, Obama still wins? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveEconomist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 04:27 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. Depends on the design of those new primaries. But if they were fair, YES, IMO, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveEconomist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 05:04 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. Kick! How about a few K&R's? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phrigndumass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 06:24 PM Response to Original message |
43. I believe that's her only chance to even come close ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phrigndumass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 06:26 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. Here's the math ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveEconomist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 06:36 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. EXCELLENT post. But did your MI and FL scenarios adjust for the increase in the 4047 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phrigndumass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 06:48 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. Thank you, and Yes, they were increased for FL and MI |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveEconomist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 07:01 PM Response to Reply #43 |
47. HRC 2 days ago: 'I don't think that there should be any do-over...Florida should be seated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phrigndumass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 07:52 PM Response to Reply #47 |
50. Even if HRC gets her wish, and they are seated as is ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveEconomist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 08:51 PM Response to Reply #50 |
52. Thanks for the extra effort--It's good to know the hurdles to a HRC 1st-ballot win. But |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phrigndumass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 09:02 PM Response to Reply #52 |
54. Neither candidate can win on 1st-ballot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveEconomist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 11:32 PM Response to Reply #54 |
55. So Superdelegates MUST act en masse before August |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dana_b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 01:29 AM Response to Reply #47 |
57. hmmm... a revote may be impossible if what I heard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveEconomist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 01:59 AM Response to Reply #57 |
58. Sounds like the Republican Secy of State is keeping the train wreck on schedule |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveEconomist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 08:06 AM Response to Reply #57 |
59. Kick! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 07:19 PM Response to Original message |
48. She had a lot of early support |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gore1FL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 07:26 PM Response to Reply #48 |
49. When on the rulkes committee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
awaysidetraveler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 07:59 PM Response to Original message |
51. The funny thing is that it's okay... by the end of the election, Obama will win more pledged |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yossariant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 08:16 AM Response to Original message |
60. MI and FL don't need to be seated. She has been seen to be fighting for them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveEconomist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 09:30 AM Response to Reply #60 |
61. Interesting perspective. "She's been seen to be fighting for FL". But let's think this through |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yossariant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 03:59 PM Response to Reply #61 |
62. Let's think it though even further. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC