bleowheels
(356 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:21 PM
Original message |
Media reports on Wyoming Caucus and cannot fathom why anybody would vote for Obama over Clinton |
|
Such is the response from anyone watching the coverage of Wyoming Caucus today. That's right, we must be too stupid to decide for ourselves. Sheesh!!!!
|
provis99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:23 PM
Response to Original message |
1. y'all wear your cowboy hats to tight? |
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:24 PM
Response to Original message |
2. ha ha---gee the media is biased---too bad. |
Gore1FL
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. And he still wins by over 20% !!! |
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. i think today i saw about 50 threads on media bias. get used to it. |
Gore1FL
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
I just find it amusing to point out facts.
|
jody
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:30 PM
Response to Original message |
4. CNN results suggest BO's advantage was in areas where college age students dominated. n/t |
Leopolds Ghost
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-10-08 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
10. As opposed to blue-collar white folk? Out on the prairie? Where was Hillary's cowboys? |
|
The folks she ran up big numbers with Dixiecrats and Republicans in Lubbock and Amarillo, out in the big empty? You'd think those places would be natural Clinton territory, they are rock-ribbed.
|
democrattotheend
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-10-08 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
12. Because students are not "real Democrats" |
|
Except wait...they were the only age group (people under 30) to vote for Kerry in 2004! http://purplestatepundit.com/blog/election08/is-clinton-really-winning-core-democrats/
|
rainbow4321
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 09:53 PM
Response to Original message |
6. MSM is trying to stay relevant |
|
Cuz if they reported the truth, that HRC is toast, their ratings would tank..why watch their talking head pundits when the outcome is already known? They can't count on the repuke race since it is a done deal so they keep throwing out there that the Dem race outcome is close and that HRC still has a chance.
|
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-10-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
backscatter712
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 10:01 PM
Response to Original message |
8. The MSM's Rethug execs want Hillary to win. |
|
Edited on Sat Mar-08-08 10:03 PM by backscatter712
Then they'll switch direction and smear her endlessly to try to manipulate the sheeple into voting for McCain.
This is why we need to reinstate the Fairness Doctrine and tighten up the media ownership rules & break up the media oligopoly.
And who was it that signed off on loosening the media ownership rules back in the '90s? Oh, yeah. CLINTON!!!
|
Medusa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. They've got to keep the "race" going for the ratings |
|
and yes, they want Hillary so McCain can win the nomination. MSM=GOP $$$$.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:39 PM
Response to Original message |