Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton 142 Del Deficit; Obama 252 Away From 50%+1

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Khaotic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 01:12 PM
Original message
Clinton 142 Del Deficit; Obama 252 Away From 50%+1
As it stands right now Hillary has to make up a delegate deficit of 142.

Link: http://demconwatch.blogspot.com/

Even with wins comparable to "Super Tuesday II" she'll barely put a dent in it.

Why is it that soooooo many Hillary supporters forget that with every state both Hillary and Obama win delegates?

The only way for Hillary to pick up delegates is for her to win HUGE.

Huge is winning a state by 60%+ ... and she's only done that once, in Arkansas.

Barack has done it several times throughout the race, and with WY he did it AGAIN!

Does anyone remember thread after thread after thread here at DU about how Bush ignores Science? How * just refuses to see it.

Are Hillary supporters refusing to see Math?

If Obama pulls out Miss. w/ a huge margin and makes it another 60%+ win then what?

Even if Obama doesn't gain at all in the polls in Penn., and after the primary there the reality is exactly as the polls stand now, 52% - Hillary, 37% - Obama; then essentially it's a huge loss for Hillary.

Here's something Hillary supporters need to admit, the MSM is in her back pocket right now.

They want the Democrats to wage war against each other until August. That's what they want, that's where the ratings are.

The MSM aren't talking math right now ... AT ALL! Do you think the math somehow escapes them?

No way!

They know that Obama is only 252 pledged delegates away from getting to the 50%+1 mark. They know this, and they know how HUGE that is once he gets to it.

He will get there before Hillary. The only way she can't prevent it is to win at least some of the remaining states the way Obama won Hawaii. H-U-G-E!!!

I mean really ... are there ANY Hillary supporters on DU who realistically believe Hillary will win an upcoming contest (any of them) by more than 70%???

Maybe, just maybe, she'll pull that kind of win out of Puerto Rico or Guam, but not a real state.

After Obama reaches 50%+1 then it's reality time with the knowledge that Obama has finished with more pledged delegates than Hillary and the ONLY way for Hillary to win is with Super Delegates.

I really believe that the Democratic Party won't let that happen and even with HUGE MSM Hillary support and "momentum"; Hillary will be asked (behind the scenes she'll be ordered) to quit.

The party doesn't want this thing decided by Super Delegates ... period.

Even at that, Hillary's lead in Super Delegates is under 40. When Obama gets 50%+1 any remaining lead Hillary has in Supers will be gone as the Supers waiting for that to happen will go to Obama.

Like it or not, there are a pretty good group of Supers simply waiting in the wings to endorse the candidate who wins the pledged delegate count.

Now, before Hill supporters throw Mich. & Fla. in to the debate. The reality is still the same, and know the reality that she will not win either state by more than 60% ... not even Florida. Obama hasn't even stumped down there yet (during the primaries) because he choose not to break the rules like Hillary. Once he stumps there (if there's a revote) then he'll bring her advantage under 60%.

It's all about the math, unless of course 2+2 doesn't equal 4. Maybe that's true in Hillary-land.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Are Hillary supporters refusing to see Math? - LMAO
So true it is hysterical
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uben Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. What is 50% + 1
How does that factor in?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Fifty percent of total pledged delegates plus one.
Which makes it mathematically impossible for Hillary to even hope to EQUAL Obama's lead, much less surpass it (not that she has a realistic chance of doing either).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uben Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Oh, I see.......
.....if you get more than half the pledged delegates, you win. I musta read the rules wrong. I thought it said you had to have 2025 delegates to win, and anything less triggered a brokered convention. Learn something new every day!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. The nomination will likely be decided on the first ballot.
And the odds are that the superdelegates will vote to confirm the winner of the most pledged delegates through the nominating contest process as the nominee. Enough have already indicated that this is their intent to make it the most likely scenario. Which means that it's increasingly unlikely that Hillary is going to be nominated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SwampG8r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
26. menken quote
omg thats so cool can i use it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Khaotic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. 50% + 1
1,627 is fifty percent plus one of the 3,253 democratically selected delegates to the Democratic nominating convention.

Once a candidate has 1,627 of these "pledged" delegates, he or she will win the nomination -- unless the 796 superdelegates overturn the judgment of voters.

And that's not going to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. LOL - so now he needs only 1627 elected delegates? - love the new rules
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PM7nj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. neither can get to 2025
Even if Hillary wins 100% of the remaining pledged delegates she will only be at 1840
Even if Obama wins 100% of the remaining pledged delegates he will only be at 1980
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. true - very true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. With Hillary winning the popular vote
The suderdelegates will have to endorse her. Popular vote counts for more then pledged delegates. Then again, if and when we have a revote florida will push the popular vote way ahead for Hillary over Obama. Those senior citizens will come out in mass for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. Howard Dean has been pretty stern with Florida here. He won't recognize a re-vote.
He puts the blame squarely on the shoulders of the Florida legislators who changed the law. I don't see his position changing anytime soon, but the future is hard to predict.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorktv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Chairman Dean himself has stated that the credentials committee
can overrule him.

So it is perfectly plausible that they will be seated in part regardless of what happens with the supers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. He said that committee is not very likely to vote against party rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorktv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Oh probably not but the outside chance is there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stahbrett Donating Member (855 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. No way will the superdelegates override the pledged delegates
Also, Obama, not Hillary, has the popular vote lead.

Giving the nomination to Hillary when Obama has the most pledged delegates would be suicide to the party - the outcry from such a travesty, especially by the most loyal Democratic voters (which are backing Obama overwhelmingly), would guarantee that (a) McCain wins, and (b) Hillary would be considered little better than Lieberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. It would cause the party to splinter along pro-Super Delegates and Anti-Super Delegates.
If that came to pass, whatever happens, the Super Delegate system would likely be removed in future reforms entirely to avoid this situation ever again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #18
27. Another thing people fail to realize about the popular vote.
And why it won't be used:

Nevada, Maine, Washington and Iowa do not count -- that's a huge number of people right there. Plus, caucus votes do not automatically equal popular vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PseudoIntellect Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. Oh, so now pledged delegates don't matter.
Popular vote matters, because it favors Hillary, and PD's don't.

The fact is that if the caucus states Obama won were primaries, he'd have even MORE of a lead in the popular vote. Think about it...either the caucuses stay, and HRC gets an artificial lead when factoring in the two uncontested primaries, or the caucuses go, and BHO gets a larger lead in popular vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SwampG8r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
28. obama quote
using this quote i have to wonder if you really are a hillary supporter
the truth of it is so obvious
reagan was an inspiring man and changed americas direction
you may not like the way he pointed it but point it he did
bill did not move america much did he ?
we spent too much time dealing with bills ME problems
anyway you may want to rethink that quote because it makes you think and i dont think your candidate can afford people thinking for themselves right now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Recommended.
And RCP has the delegate lead at 155; I think it's safe to say it's somewhere between 140 and 160, given the spread on the nubmers I've seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. maybe they watch to much Main Stream Media?
Especially the Clinton News Network, (CNN) or Timmeh on MSNBC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PM7nj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. If she wins 62% in every state left...
Check here... http://www.slate.com/features/delegatecounter/

If Hillary gets 62% in every state left (high unlikely) she will still be behind by one delegate.. 1605/1604.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
11. I agree but there is no changing their minds. They are in a cult like trance. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. This really doesn't help your argument calling Hillary supporters a cult
and as such this type of post is not taken serious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Just giving them some of their own medicine. It was the Clinton campaign that
initiated the idea that all Obama supporters were in a cult. I guess they can dish it out but can't take it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
19. 50+1% isn't enough.
That's Hillary's strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CyberPieHole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
24. Neither one can get to 2025...the magic number. "50%+1" is a number you pulled out of your...
Hat.:evilgrin:

Neither candidate has or will have the requisite 2025 delegates before the convention. Not Clinton. NOT Obama. Those are the facts. Super-delegates will be forced to decide this. I hope Hillary and Bill use everything in their power to make the numbers move her way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmperorHasNoClothes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. On what basis do you think Hillary can convince the SD's to vote in her favor?
Assuming Obama holds on to the pledged delegate and popular vote leads, which looks likely. I don't think anyone is disputing that the superdelegates will decide the nomination, I just don't think they can justify going for Hillary if she doesn't hold the lead in the primary vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PseudoIntellect Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. ...on the basis of wishful thinking contrary to superdelegate trends 80% in favor of BHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Khaotic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. Nope, no bunny in the Hat trick here.
Just facts.

The Real Magic Number is 1,627

1,627 is fifty percent plus one of the 3,253 democratically selected delegates to the Democratic nominating convention.

Once a candidate has 1,627 of these "pledged" delegates, he or she will win the nomination -- unless the 796 superdelegates overturn the judgment of voters.

And that's not going to happen.

It's pretty simple.

Guess simple isn't simple in Hillary-land.

Using the Slate delegate resource, here's my predictions for the rest of the race.



Obama will get 50%+1 with the inclusion of North Carolina; if not he'll have it with Oregon. On May 20 she'll pick up a good chunk of delegates, but so will he.

It's about the net delegates at this point and she can't net enough to catch him. Even when she gets some net, he still makes gains toward the 50%+1 figure.

When it comes to gettin' nothin', but net ... Obama has been there far more times than Hillary.

It's a race, it's about the whole season, not just the home stretch. This is a lot more comparable to baseball than a NASCAR. Of course, Hillary and her supporters can continue to hope Obama hits the wall, but he won't.

Go Obama!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #24
34. If you knew anything about elections,
you would know that "50%+1" is the magic number it takes to win any election. This is taught in Candidate 101. Anyone who has ever worked on a campaign or has run for office knows exactly what "50%+1" means.

Of course, keyboard commandos who blog and don't work on campaigns would most likely not know what "50%+1" means and they would be more likely of accusing someone of pulling it out of their . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apocalypsehow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
31. Excellent OP. K & R.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Satyagrahi Donating Member (254 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
33. "How can you win the nomination when the math looks so bleak for you?"
Q: How can you win the nomination when the math looks so bleak for you?

Hillary: It doesn't look bleak at all. I have a very close race with Senator Obama. There are elected delegates, caucus delegates and superdelegates, all for different reasons, and they're all equal in their ability to cast their vote for whomever they choose. Even elected and caucus delegates are not required to stay with whomever they are pledged to. This is a very carefully constructed process that goes back years, and we're going to follow the process.

http://www.newsweek.com/id/120062/output/print


Power trumps math in Hillary-land.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
35. Your subliminal headline ...
might lead some to think that Hillary is closer to the nomination (-142) than Obama (-252).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yossariant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
36. When will Obama's supporters ever understand the RULES?
The RULES require 2025 delegates.

Is Obama asking the DNC to change the RULES? :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Khaotic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. No
But when will Hillary supporters realize that the Supers will support whoever gets to 50%+1 first?

50%+1 + Supers = Nomination.

The candidate who gets to 50%+1 WILL be our nominee ... period. Mark my words, that is the way it will go down.

Any other way involves spilting up the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorktv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. That is saying a lot about the Supers.
Never know how they will vote.

Either way they are going to catch hell.

And stop with the "split the party" nonsense. The party is in fine shape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. THE PARTY IS IN FINE SHAPE??? OMG WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorktv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. I was just at a YDA meeting and there were no fist fights, in fact
it was the most well attended in the few I have had a chance to go to.

And the last time I was at a state party function, it was also well attended. The primary vote numbers are up from 2004.

So exactly where is the party being destroyed? The fact that people in states that have never had much campaigning get to have a chance to vote in a Presidential campaign? Oh no! The horror!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
40. Great analysis and way too logical for HRC supporters n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC