Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Should Start Vetting His Cabinet Now.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 02:44 PM
Original message
Obama Should Start Vetting His Cabinet Now.
He should consider his possible VP's and also his Secretary of Defense and Secretary of State. This could shoot his critics, that say he is weak on defense, out of the water.

Yes, he should have Hillary on the possible list for VP's. But a better choice may be John Kerry or Senator Jim Webb? Or even Senator Chuck Hagel of Nebraska, who is retiring?

Also, for Secretary of Defense, he should consider General Wesley Clark or General Anthony Zinni? Or even, General Colin Powell? Although Powell does not have the respect of many in the Democratic Party, he would add credibility to Obama's Commander in Chief credentials.

For Secretary of State, he should consider Joe Biden or someone of that stature. Anyway you slice it, we are going to lose a couple of Senators. What would be the advantage of discussing these names? It would automatically stop the talk by Hillary, and McCain, that Obama does not cross the Commander in Chief "threshold".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. He needs to wait until all primary's are held. June isn't that far away
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. Id like to see some heavy-hitters in foreign policy,
both generals and diplomats, stand beside Obama. It would go far to squash the CiC ready argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ossman Donating Member (883 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why choose Hillary and Hagel? 2 republicans? No way.
I like the Zinni choice, as VP though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. He was against the war.
Atleast, he told them they did not have enough troops to perform their magic trick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ossman Donating Member (883 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Hagel is 99.9% conservative Republican. Yipee he IS NOW against the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hieronymus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
23. Very true .. the only thing good is Hagel's opposition to the war. And how ...
in hell would Colin Powell add anything to anyone's administration? ... he's a disgrace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
27. Obamazinni.
Obamazinni.

Obamazinni.

Obamazinni.

"Yes, I'll have the Obamazinni, but can you put the olives on the side? Thanks."

"These orchids are endemic to the Obamazinni region of Papua New Guinea."

"We're going to an exhibit of Obamazinni pottery this weekend."

:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. LOL!!
A good laugh after all the inanities I've readig around here today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. His cabinet? Let me guess, you're a man, an arrogant, ungracious man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. You are half right.
:-) Is that about your normal percentage?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Lula, you are PSYCHOTIC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. But she thinks it is OK for Hillary to say Obama is not qualified...
or doesn't pass the CIC "threshold", but it's not OK for Obama to fight back against those charges?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
34. I am afraid so
and even worse, she is not alone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimGinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
29. Let Me Guess, You Don't Have The Local MENSA Chapter On Speeddial?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. And as I understand most of his cabinet will be
Republicans and very few democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Most of our candidates have indicated that they would have some
pukes around. It really rubs me. Clinton wanted to use Poppy and colin. Kucinich mentioned the two necessary wings of the eagle. I don't want and pukes anywhere in a Democratic Administration, but it is one of those things we get a very little say in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Obama does understand that this nation is divided...
and understands that some Republicans may have to be included in his Cabinet in order to quell some of the divisions. We don't like it but he is right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Like Abe's Team of Rivals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
35. If that's what you REALLY understand
you should be very worried.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
9. No... he shouldn't... he should keep his eye on the prize.
If I have any complaint about Obama, it's his tendency to "look beyond" rather than deal with what's at hand.

He needs to remember the wise words of Shaka Zulu... "Never leave an enemy behind or it will rise again to fly at your throat."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. See... the criticism has died down already.
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
16. It would serve to highlight the fact that HE hasn't be vetted yet, so
I'm all for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Has Hillary been vetted in the last 8 years?
Or McCain, for that matter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sueragingroz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
18. He could do that
But he'd look awfully foolish if Hillary pulls it out in Denver...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. But in the meantime...
They would not be able to criticize his Commander in Chief credentials. Of course, he could say these are some of the people that he is considering for his Administration, if he is the nominee? No firm committment but to show people he is serious about national defense and his job as Commander in Chief. It's all in how he would frame it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
20. Oh yeah, Colin Powell would be a REAT choice
Since he was such a lapdog for Bush's War. Remember that bullshit presentation to the U.N.?

Yeah, he'd be a great freakin' choice. Let's fill the damn cabinet with Pukes. The Big O can show how bipartisan he is.

"Bipartisan" to the Pukes just means the Dems bend over and get ready to take it ... one of these days (or years) maybe the Big O will learn that.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. What you say is true.
But he still has credibility across Party lines. If there is any redemption, would he qualify?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Booth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. No redemption for Powell
Edited on Sun Mar-09-08 04:40 PM by Walter Sobchak
The UN speech is unforgivable. He was an active and willing participant in the biggest scam-job in recent history. And he took the lead in the most visible scene of the propoganda campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
irish.lambchop Donating Member (877 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
22. I'm also interested in who he might select
to head FEMA and John Edwards could certainly clean up the DOJ. Do you not think we'll see Susan Rice in his cabinet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Yes...
Susan Rice will be in the Cabinet. Maybe Chief of Staff?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
26. Yes, that's what the fool Bu$h was advised to do to make him look Presidential
...while stealing the election from Gore --not the media's darling, but had he been given his rightful place, the world would be a different place now. No Iraq War, global warming a serious issue with real solutions applied.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
28. Not a bad idea, Kentuck.
Smart thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SKKY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
30. I'm willing to bet he already has a "roster" of potential candidates...
...I'm willing to bet HRC is NOT on the VP list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SKKY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
31. Odierno was just replaced as MFNI by Gen Austin...
Edited on Sun Mar-09-08 05:04 PM by ALiberalSailor
...I think he's retiring as well. Very, very impressive individual.

On Edit: Never mind. Odierno is not retiring as I had thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
32. sure. Instead of respecting the fact that he hasn't yet won the nomination
he should press ahead and insult the voters by disregarding their votes in the upcoming contests
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC