Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It's 1992. Who Has the Lifetime of Experience to be POTUS?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
brindis_desala Donating Member (866 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:06 PM
Original message
It's 1992. Who Has the Lifetime of Experience to be POTUS?
Bill Clinton or John McCain?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DesertFlower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. well i don't even have to answer that.
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. lol Dick Cheny, Donald Rumsfield
Edited on Sun Mar-09-08 03:10 PM by grantcart
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Or George HW Bush--another war hero.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
34. he was also a VP for eight years
CIA head; congressman

so he was CLEARLY more qualified than Clinton ever was


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cyrano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. Al Gore. But I believe he now has the wisdom to never want the job.
Edited on Sun Mar-09-08 03:11 PM by Cyrano
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SKKY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
31. As much as I hate to say it, you're probably 100% correct...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. Bill Clinton is 46. He is too young....
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. Actually, Bill Clinton was the longest running Governor in history
And he had extensive foreign relation experience. But, don't let the facts get in the way of the sand surrounding your buried head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brindis_desala Donating Member (866 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Foreign experience. How so?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. look up his history, there is much written on it
He came to WA with lots more experience than Obama has.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Looks like he was governor for 14 years
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. It's not his job to look up facts you claim to exist.
Post the links and facts to backup your claims or not. Don't expect your opponent to do your legwork for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. opponent?
If you want to learn something, you can look it up. I already know it, so I don't have to find the source.

Or, you can remain ignorant of the facts as you continue to mimick the talking points--not knowing all the facts. You admit that you don't know the facts--and yet are unwilling to learn?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brindis_desala Donating Member (866 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Er No. Actually you made an assertion unsubstantiated by fact
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #19
30. well, of course it is substantiated by fact
And, you have such an entrenched opinion for someone that does not know the full facts!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. Bill Clinton
was governor for not one year, not two years, not three years, not four years, not five years, not six years, not seven years, not eight years, not nine years, not ten years, not eleven years, not twelve years, not thirteen years, but fourteen years. Longer than FDR, longer than Bush 2, Carter, or Reagan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmperorHasNoClothes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. And that's still less experience than GHW Bush then OR McCain now
Imagine that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. GHWBush
had less, not more but less, elected experience than Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmperorHasNoClothes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Oh, so we're only counting elected experience now?
In that case, Hillary has less, not more but less, elected experience than Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. I am using your standards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmperorHasNoClothes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Er.... ok then. So we agree Obama is more qualified than Hillary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. No, I think he feels First Lady is an elected office
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. No
Bill Clinton had 14 years of gov. plus two as AG for a total of 16. Bush had 8 as VP and I think 4 as Rep. That is 12. 16 is greater than 12 last I checked. As to the current candidates. Hillary has, as of 2008, 7 years as Senator vs 3 years for Obama. Given the fact that neither one has really had time to be a Senator for most of last year, it is more like 6 vs 2. I do discount his state Senate service. I certainly wouldn't count it the same as being governor or being Senator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Why are we arguing about Bill Clinton again?
Edited on Sun Mar-09-08 04:41 PM by high density
He's not running AFAIK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. because I was answering a post
which stated THAT BUSH 1 HAD MORE EXPERIENCE THAN BILL CLINTON. If you have a problem discussing BILL CLINTON. Then don't post in a thread where the OP mentions BILL CLINTON. It isn't my fault we are discussing BILL CLINTON.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmperorHasNoClothes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #26
33. Ah, so more rules then.
You get to decide what counts as experience, so that Hillary always ends up with more. I see how this works. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #26
35. Are you still rattling on?
I would think with all that spinning, you would have fallen over and passed out by now. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. You're trapped in your own circular logic, and fail to admit it.
I'm seeing more and more of this lately from HillFans. You would be wiser to just stop arguing and admit that you'll support her at all costs. Maybe you're one of those single issues voters, like the fundies were for Bush - and she speaks for you on that one issue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Coming from the supporter of a candidate
who almost always has supporters citing a now five year old vote as the major reason not to support mine the notion of single issue is nearly perverse. For the record I have several issues, I prefer Hillary's health care plan, I am not happy with Obama's stated support of merit pay for teachers and his public ambivalence toward vouchers, I am decidedly unhappy with the whole McClurkin mess, and Obama originally supported Roberts for justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. I'm not happy with Clinton's inability to make sound judgement when it's needed.
War, Clusterbombs, Torture, Kyl-Lieberman... TRANSPARENCY. And just a look at her campaign and the complete arrogance they ran on - finding them now only faced with the kitchen-sink formula shows consistent lack of judgment. I can't trust her on any other issue, because so far, when it really counts - she's been unable to put forth the right judgment when it really counted. And part of that failed judgment has spun this economy in to recession.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brindis_desala Donating Member (866 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. So I guess that made him more qualified than FDR who was a governor for 3 years
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
14. If you can't say something without endorsing republicans, STFU!
so I'll be quiet.

Ahh the lessons of ma and pa!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sueragingroz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
16. John McCain
Hillary is more prepared today than Bill was in 1992.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
21. Herbert Walker Bush?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yossariant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
32. We weren't at war in 1992. When is the last time that Senator Obama took a
first hand look at the situation on the ground in Iraq?

He joins President Incurious George Bush in his remarkable lack of experience and curiosity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. Ummmm
We were still flying sorties over Iraq and other bullshit related to * and his legacy and Clinton continued the sorties and no-fly zone crap.

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/southern_watch.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC