Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Push Us Around at Your Peril

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:44 PM
Original message
Push Us Around at Your Peril
Push Us Around at Your Peril

Media Pressure: Is the press really ganging up on her?
By Deidre Depke | NEWSWEEK
Mar 17, 2008 Issue

Ask any woman over 35, Clinton supporter or not: the media hate Hillary. After all, reliable voices of the left—Frank Rich, Maureen Dowd—have launched scathing critiques of her campaign, her ethics or her motives. Samantha Power, a Time contributing editor and hero of the human-rights crowd, was forced to resign from the Obama campaign last week after calling Clinton a "monster." Rolling Stone endorsed the Illinois senator with an almost beatific painting on its cover. And then there's Chris Matthews. If just half the people who have bashed Matthews for anti-Clinton rhetoric had ever actually tuned in to his program, he'd have ratings to reckon with.

Even to some conservatives, the prejudice is unmistakable. Fox News's Bill O'Reilly charges that a biased media are trying to engineer the election in Obama's favor. According to the nonpartisan Center for Media and Public Affairs, O'Reilly might actually be right: from December to mid-February, 83 percent of network-news coverage of Obama was positive. For Clinton, the number was 53 percent. After Super Tuesday, the study says, even as Clinton supporters demanded more-balanced coverage, Obama's proportion of good press dropped only to 67 percent, while Clinton's remained at about 50 percent.

Entire article at: http://www.newsweek.com/id/120068/page/1


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. What about Hillary's "strong outcome" in WY?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Obama's odds of carrying it in the GE?
How many electoral votes do they have?

Come on, tell us how that Wyoming victory is going to defeat McCain in November. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. How is Hillary going to carry Texas in the GE?
Don't laugh at small state democrats. It's not nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Splinter Cell Donating Member (498 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Here we go again
I'm sick of hearing about the media bias against Clinton. The media is the ONLY THING that has kept her in this race as long as this. Any other candidate would have been pushed by the wayside, yet the press continues to give her spotlight.

The Clinton campaign has got to be the biggest crybaby outfit in the history of the democratic party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Funny, my impression has always been
that the MSM felt Clinton was the heir apparent. They've always given her plenty of air time, and have never dismissed her ideas or wasted debate time asking if she'd seen a UFO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pbca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. A couple of things
1) I know many women over 35 who think the media has been more than fair with Hillary, Personally I know Zero women who support her.

2) I don't really believe you're a journalist

3) Congrats! You've just joined the ranks of the 'Ignore' list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. I'm a woman over 35 and I don't feel there's a bias
If her campaign wouldn't do such stupid things they wouldn't report it.

At the beginning she was considered the front runner. They talked about all the money she raised; how her campaign was managed so well; how she never made a mistake and how good she was at debates. The narrative on Obama was that he didn't do well in debates; has no experience and that he stutters when he speaks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. Bullhockey. If Obama was losing as bad as Hillary, they would have called the election by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theredpen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. The Rezko smear
Fans of either Bill or Hillary Clinton (or both) are painfully familiar with the saga of a real-estate transaction in which our people did nothing wrong, but about which they are endlessly harassed and smeared with guilt-by-associated.

Google for how many "news" reports mention the Rexko deal (and for a double-dose of Obama slime, search to see how many GD:P posts mention Rezko, too).

Obama is NOT getting a free ride.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. The media hasn't taken the gloves off yet
Edited on Sun Mar-09-08 04:09 PM by OzarkDem
not by a long shot. No doubt they're hoping to hold off in case Obama wins the nomination, then hope to unload on him in the GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theredpen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. That's why I'm glad Hillary is giving it everything she's got -- including her McCain endorsement
When Obama wins the nomination, he'll have been fully vetted and the easy "low blows" will have been parried during the primary.

I'm sure McCain was planning on a version of the "3am call" ad, but Clinton beat him to it, and it bounced off. Now McCain's got nothing and the media will yawn at the "experience" tactic. They'll say, "McCain is running on his experience, but that didn't work for Clinton."

I hope she keeps it coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoBushSpokenHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. Female over 35 here, turned the TV off because I believed it was
too biased toward Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mculator Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. Clinton/Obama or else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Obama/Clinton would have to be the ticket.
Obama has a message to run on, Clinton does not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mculator Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. You mean massage?
Of your emotions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ctaylors6 Donating Member (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
9. beyond scary thought in any context: "O'Reilly might actually be right"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmperorHasNoClothes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
14. I asked my wife. She's only 33 but she think the "media hates Hillary" line is bullshit
I guess she'll finally see the light in 2 more years :eyes:

Do these people ever stop to think that the reason Hillary gets bashed so much is that she has done a lot more that is bash-worthy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
16. Who got the most face time in the debates? It was Hill. Far and away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
18. CBS is part of the media - they certainly don't hate her.
Edited on Sun Mar-09-08 04:28 PM by HypnoToad
Still, sometimes those generalizations and judgments make sense when there's far more showing things one way than the alternatives... maybe she is hated.

Most politicians tend not to get a free ride in the first place.

BTW: Why is O'Reilly trying to set up Obama when Coulter and Limbaugh are trying to set up Clinton? Don't they all prefer McCain, who was naughty toward McAbel?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
canadian_is_cold Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
19. I am a woman over 35, I have always thought the media was completely PRO-Clinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tribetime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
21. you reap what you sow
although dishing it out and them playing the victim does get votes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mooney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
22. She's a politician, and politicians sometimes get savaged by the press.
Suck it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toallwhoshallsee Donating Member (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
23. It Might just be the time....
The 2008 Democratic National Convention will be held from August 25 to August 28 in Denver, Colorado. The convention, sponsored by the United States Democratic Party, will nominate a candidate for the presidency.

It has been a long time since we settled the nomination, and "defined" our party at the National Convention....It happens from time too time, and this maybe the "Mother Of All Conventions". We will all have to wait and see..But it's not a bad thing every now and again.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC