Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sorry, But a 50-50 Split Is The Only Fair Thing For FL & MI

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 05:31 PM
Original message
Sorry, But a 50-50 Split Is The Only Fair Thing For FL & MI
Of course, they should be allowed to go to the convention. But we have to show America that we are the Party of responsibility, not the Party of do-whatever-you-feel. They knew what they were doing, they broke the rules and unfairly jumped ahead of other states to have their say. Why should they be allowed to be one of the first to influence the race...and the last to determine it?

They had their cake, but there is no reason they should get to eat it, too.


Pottery Barn rule: You break it, you own it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. those FL voters did NOT voter for BO---get real.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NDambi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Fl & MI will not be seated as is...you better dance your way to another solution Sally
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. STOP WITH THE NAME-CALLING
NDambi (794 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sun Mar-09-08 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Fl & MI will not be seated as is...you better dance your way to another solution Sally
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NDambi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. What name calling...Sally is a term of endearment... come down off the ledge
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SKKY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #12
23. Is someone feeling "down"???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krawhitham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Damn Nancy, what is your problem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #18
27. Maybe they need a pillow to cry on
as this person is fond of saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. I agree it's the simplest thing
Clinton will never go for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. Even if they re-vote it won't be nearly enough to help Clinton win.
She is just trying to get people to think they would be the difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AJH032 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. The question of course, is:
would you say the same thing if Obama got more votes in those states than Clinton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SKKY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
24. I would. This is, and has always been more about ensuring a Democrat...
..wins the election that being for Obama or Clinton. Now, I'm for Obama, but I'll vote and support with my money HRC if she wins the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PseudoIntellect Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. Isn't a 50/50 split essentially the EXACT same thing as...
not counting them at all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
25. It Would Allow Them to Attend The Convention
They absolutely should be at the convention. But they shouldn't be rewarded for jumping the other states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. No, the SIMPLEST thing would be to just not seat them...
The MOST FAIR thing to do would be to let them vote again.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
30. And why should Obama
have to pay for the dlc power-grabbing officials' scam in Florida and Michigan when all they had to do was wait a week?

Let bil nelson pay for Florida's revote and whomever is the wannabe power grabber in Michigan's jump a week ahead which was against the rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yossariant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. Sorry, that is the most UNdemocratic solution I have heard.
It gets Dean's bacon out of the fire.

It removes the issue between the candidates.

It allows the delegates to be seated.

The only people left out in the cold are the actual VOTERS --- who stopped what they were doing and took themselves to the polls to VOTE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. right--and if 50-50 then some clinton voters dels go to Obama--!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spartan61 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
20. I took myself to the polls to vote in Florida
but I went to vote on Amendment #1. I think that's what brought many of the voters to the polls because we knew our vote in the primary wasn't going to count. Many other voters didn't bother to vote because their votes weren't suppose to count.
I was just watching the ABC News and they were showing how close Obama and Clinton are in delegates. The anchor said it was something around 100 delegates that separated them. Then the anchor said that was counting Michigan as a win for Clinton. Now, that's what I call UNdemocratic!! How dare she call that a win when she was the only major player on the ticket. I say, split the delegates between them and get on with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yossariant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #20
29. the record turnout in Florida is good for democracy.
You misinterpreted what you heard.

They are separated by 99 delegates -- NOT including Florida or Michigan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. Simply put, she is trying to poison the process.
They knew these two races weren't going to count, but since the process was skewed in her favor, she now wants to scream and cry about disenfranchisement because she is losing.

Yet another reason I don't want her in the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. That is a bad idea, which won't make the problem go away.
There will be endless whining, and possibly lawsuits, if this were to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NDambi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. The party and the candidates will have to agree..but they won't be seated as is..and they shouldn't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
15. RIGHT!!! Or proportional to the current pledge delegate votes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tandem5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
16. by doing that you show America you don't give a crap about the voters...
that they are just peons to be manipulated and their votes are prizes to be won! Elections do not belong to the candidates they belong to the people and when you speak of fairness in terms of candidates it reminds me of a certain Supreme Court ruling that cited irreparable harm not to voters, but to a single man, Bush.

All the outrage is over small bodies (DNC officials and super delegates) possibly deciding who our nominee is going to be, but when it comes to FL and MI there is no outrage that a small body of officials DID decide for millions that their voices wouldn't be heard. So its more like - they break it and the voters lose.

There is no high road without being an advocate for the American voter!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. The State DNC HQ's COULD have decented on the reThuglican decision but they didn't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tandem5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. was that not my point?
small bodies of officials deciding for the masses?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
17. I suggest another approach, or process, to arrive at a resolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
22. Bo supporters should be happy to seat FLA and MI, or allow a do over....
b/c he'll do better than he did the first time around, and if Bo supporters are correct about the math, he still wins the nom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
26. Revote. THAT'S the only fair option
Let them vote in a primary they know will count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
28. how can you say that receiving almost 300,000 more votes
then obama in florida would be fair by splitting it 50-50? So unfair. Hell, if anything obama should have had the mo when he won s c but I guess folks in florida were not decieved by the race baiting by the obama camp they did in south carolina......

And since obama was dumb enough to take his name off the ballot he should receive no delegates from Michigan.

that is fair and balanced.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
31. I Agree With You, Dr. Funk !!!
I DO NOT want the two states that violated the agreed upon rules to have any say in who wins this thing!

They can attend the convention, they can vote on the platform, but anything concerning the nominees, sorry, your elected officials screwed you out of that option.

NO FUCKING WAY!!!

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC