Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If HRC people don't understand the nuanced statement Obama made about Reagan,

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
joeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:00 PM
Original message
If HRC people don't understand the nuanced statement Obama made about Reagan,
then they are the less educated voters that all the polls say they are. You really shouldn't worry that Obama may embrace Reagan's policies, which he doesn't, you should be very worried that he can get crossover voters in droves to start the Obama revolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's exactly what they are worried about
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Her supporters here frankly just don't strike me as all that bright or thoughtful.
Some are, but the vast majority are a little bit...simple. Since they trash Obama supporters endlessly, I feel quite justified in letting it rip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. LOL! Yeah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. take that down now please. Nothing but flamebait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:21 PM
Original message
Truth hurts, quit whining. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
21. You folks are making an art of looking foolish lately!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
38. ooh ooh. What did it say?!?!?
Someone got TS'd. I'm just kidding. If it was TSable, I don't even want to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. You should have seen the Hillary Clinton precinct captain...
...at my caucus.

She stood on a chair and gave a speech about Clinton. The first line of this speech was, "Well...I know most of
you Edwards and Obama supporters only like these guys because they're good looking, but..."

Yeah. Right. Whatever.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Ha! I heard similar stuff at my caucus. One lady got up and went on and
on about Bill and how wonderful the 90's were, and all of a sudden a bunch of people from our side started yelling, "Bill's not on the ballot!". I seriously think a lot of Clinton people are voting for Bill, either out of fondness and nostalgia, or because their electorate is elderly and just a little bit confused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
printpolitico Donating Member (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
54. Put the pup back in the bag
Nasty nasty, equally true for BO supporters. Except for the lack of intelligence. part, I wouldn't call someone less intelligent without looking at their resume.
Go Jayhawks.








































































Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. They don't want to understand that
they just want to play the spin game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. Carville's new line for Hillary must be "it's the stupidity, stupid..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. Oh That's Rich. Someone Preaching To The Hillary Side About Understanding Nuances.
With all due respect, that's the funniest goddamn thing I've read all day.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damndude Donating Member (306 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. well
not everyone wants to spend all day debating what the meaning of is is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. And You're Trying To Imply What By That Exactly?
This should be interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. just increase your reading comprehension skills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TriplePlay Donating Member (36 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
37. Was it OK for Bill Clinton to praise Reagan?
Or is every hypocrisy from the Clinton campaign OK for you Hillary supporters?

The Ideas Bill Forgot

By E. J. Dionne Jr.
Friday, January 25, 2008; Page A19

It was a remarkable moment: A young, free-thinking presidential hopeful named Bill Clinton sat down with reporters and editors at The Post in October 1991 and started saying things most Democrats wouldn't allow to pass their lips.

Ronald Reagan, Clinton said, deserved credit for winning the Cold War. He praised Reagan's "rhetoric in defense of freedom" and his role in "advancing the idea that communism could be rolled back."

"The idea that we were going to stand firm and reaffirm our containment strategy, and the fact that we forced them to spend even more when they were already producing a Cadillac defense system and a dinosaur economy, I think it hastened their undoing," Clinton declared.

Clinton was careful to add that the Reagan military program included "a lot of wasted money and unnecessary expenditure," but the signal had been sent: Clinton was willing to move beyond "the brain-dead politics in both parties," as he so often put it.

His apostasy was widely noticed. The Memphis Commercial Appeal praised Clinton a few days later for daring to "set himself apart from the pack of contenders for the Democratic nomination by saying something nice about Ronald Reagan." Clinton's "readiness to defy his party's prevailing Reaganphobia . . .," the paper wrote, "is one reason he's a candidate to watch."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #37
39. Your Reply Has What To Do With My Post Now?
Not sure why you felt the need to post that to me, since it had not a fucking iota to do with my reply.

I have a feeling we'll be having much fun in the future. Can't wait! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
9. I understand--Obama endorsed McCain--simple as that.....
Edited on Sun Mar-09-08 11:17 PM by rodeodance


see how silly that is?--but it is the same as all you folks saying that Hillary endorsed mccain!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #9
56. Well put, Rodeodance. Once again, you nailed it.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
10. I hear that Obamafolk believe that Clinton endorsed mccain! Why would she do that
when she wants that job herself?---there is no logic to saying that now is there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. She made a very clear implied endorsement
That barring a vote for her, voting for McCain would be preferable to voting for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. don't be silly. Hillary is a Democrat! -You listen to RW tv too much are are duped!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. No, I don't listen to RW tv, nor am I 'are are duped'
If you're unable to parse meaning from statements made by candidates, what are you doing attacking or defending anyone on an online message board?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. and you need to increase your reading comprehension skills. And yes the RW machine
is repeating this and you are duped
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #25
34. If RWTV is repeating a talking point that Hillary coughed out for them,
I'm sure they're grateful to have the attack video all set for the general election. She very plainly implied that she and McCain have the necessary experience and that Obama does not. The unmistakable message is that if she loses the nomination, the nation would be in better hands with old man McCain than Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. Too much RW smut is brought here to DU!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #13
48. LOL
"very clear implied..."


Sort of an overt backhanded thing, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damndude Donating Member (306 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:16 PM
Original message
i think.......i hope
his idea is to rebuild the democratic party into the dominant force in american politics in the way that neither clinton has shown interest in doing. now while the republicans have chosen a nominees that dost even have the support of it's base and he has to foraging around to votes from his own electorate flashing his evangelical cred, it is the time to build the image and the coalitions to move the country away from its steady diet of fear, intolerance, puritanism and secrecy. obama has been the one attempting to do just that. look at the democrat he helped to pick up republican hastert's congressional seat in a republican district this passed week.
the top down ticket. state and local races. thats is what has become important. rebuilding our party from the ground up and wrest it from refugees of a failed revolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CitizenLeft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
26. well said
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
12. Hillary Clinton...
...never thought that Obama liked Reagan's ideas. She understood very well what Obama was saying.

You forget that the Nevada caucuses were close. Hillary needed to swing the hatchet.

Obama made a statement of fact about "Ronald Reagan changing the trajectory of politics" and that the "Republican
party was the party of ideas" in the 80's. It was true. They galvanized around their platform and
the Dems did not have a succinct message.

We've seen this over and over again. She attacks, twists and then after the damage is
done, moves onto the next attack.

And endless parade of manufactured manipulations...that's her game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. Obama endored Ronnie Reagan!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. He said that he changed the trajectory of...
...American politics.

He didn't endorse Reagan. You are absurd.

So hypocritical of you to be so hysterical over Obama's statement of fact, regarding Reagan's
ability to galvanize a movement---yet it's fine and dandy with you when Hillary leverages the
candidacy of John McCain, in order to trash a fellow Dem.

So, let me get this intellectual garbage disposal of insanity straight:

--Observational comments about Ronald Reagan = BAD! BAD!!!
--Praise of John McCain = POETRY FROM HILLARY THAT WE CAN ALL BE PROUD OF!

Riiiiiiight.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. Obama most certainly did ENDORSE Ronnie!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. You're right....
Obama did endorse Reagan. He endorsed him as the guy most likely to be currently being eaten by hungry earthworms

Is that so wrong?

Why do you hate 'The circle of life'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Right on----Glad you finally got it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #29
45. Exhibit #1 on display for all to see. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #12
23. I was talking to her supporters here who keep spewing the Reagan connection.
It just shows their ignorance and inability to see past the word Reagan and read into exactly what he said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. I hear ya...
I find their Reagan hysteria pretty hysterical myself.

How can they be so outraged about Obama's Reagan comments, then turn around and justify and defend Hillary's
praise of McCain and her compliments about McCain's breadth of experience?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #12
41. They were, of course, very BAD ideas.
But yes, you are correct. She lies. We've seen it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tokenlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
19. The Clintons knew damn well what Obama was saying about Reagan..
Edited on Sun Mar-09-08 11:21 PM by tokenlib
Bill was the poster child for the transforming influence of Reagan. Embracing welfare reform, giving the military everything it wanted to show his toughness, triangulating and stealing republican themes. Democrats are still afraid of Reagan's shadow and react to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. Obama
endorsed Reagen. We know all about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
27. They don't understand math, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
31. Here's what a poster on huffington has
to write about that..

"I could have written this column. How many of us has Hillary lost along the way? It would be interesting to get a number.
I voted for each Clinton two times, and defended them even when I felt ashamed of their ideas (Health Care Secrecy, The Welfare 'Reform" war on the Poor, The Iraq War, Triangulationism) and their conduct (THAT WOMAN!!! Marc Rich. The bald ambition of running for Senate in a state you never lived in because "Hillary deserves to be our Senator").

Then I watched Hillary pin Obama with things I knew he never said, because I had watched the video on You Tube and read the transcript, about "Republicans having 'all the best ideas.'"

Even after he proved to her SHE and Bill had praised Reagan directly and warmly and she was telling lies, she said, "Well, that's how it sounded to me."


I think The Clinton's are a disease on our soul. Bill never got near 50 % of the vote, and I wonder how she plans on winning without those of us she has alienated who are life-long Democratic Party members. And Hillary "DittoTaylorMarsh-heads, spare us all the talk about Hillary's "steadfastness". She survives because she has no shame and no ideas. She is the creation of the Lobbyist and Hedge Fund Class and she has turned her Fame, like Bill, into a fortune."


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=4997075&mesg_id=4997858
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
36. Does anyone have a clip that includes the question he was asked?
I've only seen and heard his response. I'd like to know the context in which he was speaking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
40. I expect it's largely related to Clinton worship ...
... where they're unable to wrap their minds around the possibility that Nixon was more liberal/progressive than Bill Clinton. Nixon mostly continued liberal/progressive policies while Bill Clinton mostly continued Republican/Conservative/Reaganomics policies.

Obama didn't praise Reagan's policies, he only commented on Reagan's transformational aspect, his changing the direction of the country.

And, right on!, regarding the crossover voters ... and I'd add that Obama has begun building the popular support in more states across the nation that will help the Democrats win more House and Senate seats, and move towards the working majority that he is talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
42. Trade you one Obama Reagan reference for one HRC McCain reference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
43. guess you think Paul Krugman is stupid, too, though he's a brilliant progressive economist
Krugman is someone dems have always admired, whose ideas and viewpoints are truly progressive

a rarity among university economists, who are largely in the neo classical mindset

even Obama's Goolsby is a big advocate of free trade

so...Krugman correctly detected the true intent of Obama's Ronnie Reagan remarks

and condemned them

so you want to say Krugman is stupid, too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #43
47. No, I have always admired Krugman and concede he is brilliant.
However, he is the classic example of how allegiance can blind someone, even someone as smart as Krugman. Do you remember Kerry Mullis (SP?) He is a brilliant scientist that came up with the PCR technique for DNA identification. For the right amount money he took the stand and testified against that technique's validity to help O.J. get off. Go figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smalll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
44. "Nuanced statement" is just a polite way to say GAFFE.
Like when Obamarosa said she'd never been really proud of her country until her hubby broke into the first tier. That was just a nuanced statement about the political process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #44
46. No, it was a nuanced statement with no praise in it. This is praise:
Hillary on Reagan: He played the balance and the music beautifully.

Or gaffe, take it anyway you want to.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:06 AM
Response to Original message
49. and they do not mind Hillary endorsing McCain.
only a matter of time before she starts campaigning for him in order to build her FP cred.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sulawesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
50. This is a good time to bring up this tidbit from HRCs web site...
"But no president can do it alone. She must break recent tradition, cast cronyism aside and fill her cabinet with the best people, not only the best Democrats, but the best Republicans as well.. We’re confident she will do that. Her list of favorite presidents - Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Lincoln, both Roosevelts, Truman, George H.W. Bush and Reagan - demonstrates how she thinks. As expected, Bill Clinton was also included on the aforementioned list."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
51. It has gotten rather disappointing and tiresome to see Obama supporters
accept the assumption that less educated people are ignorant and cannot understand nuanced statements. It does not take a college education to understand political speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
52. Can we stop insulting voters?
Please! I am all for criticism of Clinton (and there is plenty to criticize, IMO) but why do we need to attack the people who vote for her?

I can't stand when people call us "trust fund babies" or "latte liberals" or "cultists", so why do we need to insult her voters as uneducated or stupid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
53. ass...
...nice way to insult people...yeah, if we don't see things your way, we're less educated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ORDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
55. HRC people aren't exactly stupid, they just love to twist everything and anything
to support their candidate, to the detriment of the party and country, if necessary.

Every week that passes and every new mendacious, misleading tactic that comes out of Hillary's campaign shows me she is just more of the same.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC