|
DNC Chair Howard Dean's Letter to the Democratic Pres. Candidates: "As the leader of the Democratic Party, I strongly urge you to adhere to the 2008 Delgate Selection Rules. ...
The 2008 Delegate Selection Rules adopted by the full DNC at its August 2006 meeting clearly provide that only 4 states -- Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire and South Carolina -- may hold their respective contests prior to February 5, 2008. The finding of Non-Compliance included a 100% loss of pledged and unpledged delegates." August 31, 2007
---------------
Clinton Campaign Official, Public Statement on the DNC's Michigan and Florida pledge:
"We believe Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina play a unique and special role in the nominating process. And we believe the DNC's rules and its calender provide the necessary structure to respect and honor that role. Thus, we will be signing the pledge to adhere to the DNC approved nominating calendar."
Official Release of the The Hillary Clinton Campaign September 1, 2007 (the next day! so prompt...)
-----------------
Hillary Clinton, interview with KO on MSNBC News: (stutters included for emphasis) Q: "Does that effort, is it fair for critics who look at that effort, and say, this is Senator Clinton trying to change the aggreed-upon rules in Florida after the game has already begun and in fact has already been played?"
A: "No, Not at all. We agreed that we would not campaign in either Florida or Michigan and we -- uh I certainly did not. And uh I was pleased that, against an organized effort to vote "Uncommitted" in Michigan, I got a healthy majority there and I'm pleased that today I had another victory in Florida. Uh, there have been the four early contests - I'm very grateful for my victories in New Hamshire and Nevada, and, uh, in Michigan and Florida. And I think it's, uh, absolutely fair to say that any Democrat needs to win uh Michigan and Florida, if we're going to be sure to have a victory in November 2008. That's what I intend to do Keith. And I think uh there's no reason why anyone should uh doubt the importnace of Florida. We've seen that uh time and time again. So I am going to work to do everything I can to seat these delegates. I think they earned it. They played by the rules, we all played by the rules. But now we need to move on, and we need to start thinking about victory about victory for hte Democrats and that's what I'm going to do."
...
Q: "Question here that pertains to a statement that Senator Obama's campaign just put out and we'd appreciate your reaction to it. Let me read it in full: 'When Senator campaign was campaigning in Iowa and New Hampshire, she said that states like Michigan and Florida that won't award delegates -- quoting you -- "don't count for anything" -- unquote -- now that Senator Clinton has lost badly in South Carolina, she is trying to assign meaning to a contest that awards zero delgates and where no campaigning has occurred." Beyond the laughter, what's your reaction?
A: "Well, you know, that's typical campaign jargon. Uh, look, we have each won two of the early four states. I've also won in Michigan against a, a very concerted effort by my oppoinenets to try to get people to vote uncommitted. And I have just won a big victory in Florida. You know the election is about the future. And coming very close in uh time is whether or not the Democrats will be able to put together the electoral votes to win. And I think that all those voters who turned out for us already in the states that have participated didn't do it uh just to have their vote counted one time. They did it because they thought they were picking the next President of the United States. And the way we're going to get to have the next President be a Democrat is to make sure that every state believes that its votes count. And there isn't any state where that's more important than Florida because of recent history. ===>
So we all agreed not to campaign, but now that uh the election has been held, I am very proud that I have won, and I am very very muchlooking forward to having Florida in the winning column in November."
________________________________________________________________
IN CAPS AND UNDERLINED IN CASE SOME CLINTON PROSELYTIZER ATTEMPTS TO RANT OR POSTURE OTHERWISE:
WHY CHANGE HER WORD? AFTER SIGNING A PLEDGE NO LESS? NOT A PLEDGE SIMPLY NOT TO CAMPAIGN, AS SO MANY OF YOU SO OFTEN CIRCUMLOCUTE, BUT A PLEDGE TO HONOR THE DNC'S DECISION... THE DNC's NOMINATION CALENDER DECISION. :shrug:
We all enjoy the double-speak. Lay it on us. :popcorn:
Oh yes, before I forget: I anticipate some "TU QUOQUE" rebuttal about Obama. Feel free to post those here, but first explain why it's ok for Hillary to lie and then ignore said deceit.
|