electron_blue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-10-08 11:16 AM
Original message |
| If MI and FL are not seated or counted, then why is the total delegates needed |
|
not being lowered by the amount "lost" in the MI, FL elections? Why is the amt needed to win the nomination still 2025? Seems to me that if we're not going to count them, then the winning amount should be lower.
Does anyone know?
|
| Bolo Boffin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-10-08 11:17 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Mon Mar-10-08 11:35 AM by boloboffin
If MI and FL are seated, the total delegates needed goes up accordingly.
|
| electron_blue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-10-08 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
Somehow I missed that. I thought the total amount needed to win has always been 2025, even before the FL, MI fiasco came up.
|
| cloudythescribbler
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-10-08 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 3. Yes, I was under the same impression ... |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:19 PM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
