Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary says NO! (warning graphic)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
grassfed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:10 PM
Original message
Hillary says NO! (warning graphic)
Edited on Mon Mar-10-08 12:15 PM by grassfed

More than 50 international organizations, including the International Committee of the Red Cross, the Mennonite Central Committee, Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International and the International Committee to Ban Landmines have called for a moratorium on cluster bomb use. On December 13, 2001 the European Parliament passed a resolution calling for an immediate global moratorium on their use to be followed by an outright ban.

Yet, Hillary Rodham Clinton voted NO on Amendment No. 4882 that would have banned the use of cluster bombs in civilian areas.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. post a warning in the title
some people dont like the graphic images at lunchtime
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femmedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Can you please edit your headline to say "warning, graphic"?
Edited on Mon Mar-10-08 12:15 PM by femmedem
Gives people some warning about what they're gonna see.

Welcome to DU. :hi:

Edited to add: thanks for your edit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm seriously considering sending that to some of my "Pro-Life"
acquaintences, without a warning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theredpen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Send them a few of these, too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skater314159 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
31. Wow. We think waaaaaaay too alike!
Edited on Mon Mar-10-08 02:11 PM by skater314159
Even long distance, you pick up my vibes!



EDIT: NOTICE WE POSTED THE SAME THING, AT THE SAME TIME. CREEEEPY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skater314159 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:00 PM
Original message
Here's another pic you can send them.
It's a sticker I have had on my truck as long as I've owned it...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmilyAnne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. That breaks my heart. Barack Obama voted against this, true?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. He voted FOR the ban, as did most Democrats. Clinton side with the Republicans on that vote
and voted AGAINST that ban.

Many, many details at http://www.fpif.org/fpifsearch/

Just search under Hillary Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skater314159 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Thanks Bread,
I was trying to look that one up - and you found it fast!

Thanks for the info.

This is something that MUST be shared with everyone who calls themselves "pro-life" or "a peace activist"... this is NOT something that should be ignored (as it is by the M$M in the US).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmilyAnne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Thanks. That's what I thought. I just don't see how that can be defended. Some HRC supporters were
talking about the ban on cluster bombs tying the hands of our military. I think the use of them should be seen as a war crime. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grassfed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
22. better link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. Does it surprise you that the Monster would vote against cluster bombs?
Monsters are for war. Cluster bombs in civilian areas is just part of the fun.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. She's a MONSTER I tell you - a MONSTER!!!11!!!
She killed that child!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. So By Your Logic, Obama Funding The War Is To Blame For The Child In That Pic As Well?
Cause, like, without the war and stuff, the cluster bombs wouldn't be an issue...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Your logic is killing me here!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmilyAnne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I read that post and, I swear, my brain started leaking out of my ear. Its the anti-logic!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. I know...Sometimes you just need to pause and think about what you are saying
I would understand if somebody wanted to do a spin on a political issue but on this matter, when most democrats actually voted for the ban, there is no excuse for Hillary to side with the republicans.

There is no excuse. I cant believe somebody is trying to do a spin on this issue. Its totally mind buggling.

And I cant believe Hillary actually sided with the republicans on this. I thought she was above this stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. Yes. Logic Usually Does Hurt The Brains Of Those Who Lack Critical Thinking Skills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmilyAnne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. This is about a ban on cluster bombs, dear. A ban on cluster bombs. You think you're being, like,
cute and stuff with your, like, glib response but, see, Hillary voted for both the war and the use of cluster bombs. Leaving Barack Obama completely out of the equation, forgetting that he even exists, HOW the hell can you defend Hillary Clinton on this issue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #14
27. Because I Understand Her Reasoning.
I also understand that her vote otherwise wouldn't have changed a goddamn thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmilyAnne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. So because it wouldn't have mattered for her to vote for the ban, its all the same that she voted
against the ban? Is that why she voted for the IWR, because it wouldn't have mattered otherwise? How is this a defense? Bizarre.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #27
36. Can you spell "triangulation?"
Critical thinking, my ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. "The dead only know one thing. . .
It is better to be alive."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
16. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
grassfed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. this isn't the place

to discuss the potential Democratic nominees position on war crimes?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nomaco-10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. Everyone should see this, and ......
also the pictures of the slaughtered bodies littering the landscape of Darfur in the Sudan, the nearly one million bodies mutilated and left to rot in the scorching sun of Rwanda, and then ask themselves, what path should this, the greatest super power in the world take when it comes to these atrocities.
I'm not offended by the photo in this post, I'm more ashamed of the policies the leaders of this country have taken in the past. That's why this time, this election, I choose change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
19. K&R
The hypocrisy of the pro lifers is astounding. They care about the fate of the unborn but don't care about national heath care or the innocent victims in Iraq and other places and they also don't give a damn about the security of their own parents and the elderly and they are pro capital punishment as well. They are a nasty bunch of authoritarian predators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnarchoFreeThinker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
20. excellent post. the truth of Clinton's votes matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
21. Despite my agreement with the ban, it's important to at least be familiar with the rationale for ..
... opposing it.

One word: Korea.

The UN/US/ROK forces have planted extensive minefields along the border of the DMZ ... as a deterrent to an invasion-in-force across the north/south lines. The Pentagon, of course, adamantly defends their deployment of mindfields and use of cluster bombs as necessary to "save American lives." Thus, it's not surprising that a politician seeking to appease the war-mongers and mmacho-militants would avoid supporting such a moratorium.

I personally regard such appeasement of the pro-war militants as moral cowardice. But the rationale needs to be understood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. I doubt that is a civilian area
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. Her vote was against a requirement to prevent their use in civilian areas?
This is a war crime.

It doesn't matter if the people are Korean or Iraqi. There's no excuse for this!


UPDATE: Just to be perfectly clear, Senator Clinton voted against banning the use of cluster bombs in civilian areas. Her vote was not against banning the use of cluster bombs altogether. Think about that: Should our military be permitted to use cluster bombs in civilian areas, with each exploding bomb covering the range of a football field? Yes or no? Senator Clinton said yes. Senator Obama said no. Here is the exact text, straight from Senate Amendment No. 4882:


    Sec. 8109. No funds appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act my be obligated or expended to acquire, utilize, sell, or transfer any cluster munition unless the rules of engagement applicable to the cluster munition ensure that the cluster munition will not be used in or near any concentrated population of civilians, whether permanent or temporary, including inhabited parts of cities or villages, camps or columns of refugees or evacuees, or camps or groups of nomads.



http://mediabloodhound.typepad.com/weblog/2008/02/hillary-vs-obam.html



So there can be no doubt on the voting record and an important difference between Clinton and Obama: http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=2&vote=00232

Please read that entire link. I understand you're only explaining the rationale but this can't be justified morally. Not even in the case of Korea because the minefields you're talking about aren't in civilian areas.

Click here to go back to the main forums.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. OK. Understood. Thanks.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. I'm pleasantly shocked
No snark? No denial? Are there more like you around?

It's a real pleasure to meet you :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. (lol!) Hey! You composed a strraightforward and clear post.
You provided good information to show the specific dimension of the issue outside that which I'd cited. You didn't stoop to name-calling and accuse me of being a baby-killer (like SOME have). I have no license to attack ... and only resort to it when it's self-defense (and then not all the time).

I like "civil" and eschew the feces-flinging. Peace on! Namaste! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
26. Thank you. People need to know how morally bankrupt Hillary is
She's number 1, with more contributions than all the other candidates put together, from the weapons industry.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/10/17/defense-industry-embraces_n_68927.html

Cluster bombs to kill women and children all over the world. What an outrage!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tveil Donating Member (60 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
34. Shame on Hillary!
it never ends with her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
35. JFC!!!
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC