Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why are people comparing the Spitzer thing to Farrakhan and McClurkin?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:15 PM
Original message
Why are people comparing the Spitzer thing to Farrakhan and McClurkin?
Let me see, Farrakhan is anti-semitic and McClurkin is homophobic.

Spitzer who is married fucked a prostitute and broke the law.


Now Spitzer broke the law, he'll pay a fine and his wife will put is dick in her purse. I don't see how him fuckin some broad is 'political'. I mean if he had fucked Bill, yes. Mrs. McCain...absolutely. A reporter...maybe. But just some hooker babe? I don't see how that equates to being anti-semitic and preaching it to the masses or being a homophobe and preaching that to the masses.



Farrakhan and McClurkin impact large segments of our US population.



I may be wrong here but they are not the same people.

Now if Hillary had been with a prostitute, absolutely, if her campaign manager or someone high on her staff, then maybe. But a guy who endorsed her slept around on his wife and all of a sudden that equals Farrakahn and McClurkin. I don't see it.

EXPLAIN IT TO ME.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jakem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. they are equally meaningless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I'd go with that for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. They are not equally meaningless.
What McClurkin preaches is insulting and demeaning to a large section of the population, and it's also a lie. You cannot pray to God and be "cured" of homosexuality as if it were something you caught.

And Obama allowed him to do it. Obama is contributing to the misinformation and lies. Yeah, I want someone like that for President. And they same McCain is the same... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jakem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. ok, and hillary 'allowed' bush to go to war.

happy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #12
33. I didn't know this was tit for tat.
Still doesn't excuse what Obama has done.

He also has repeatedly voted to fund the war, despite his professed objection to it.

And, for the record, I am NOT a Hillary supporter. I don't care for EITHER of the Dem candidates, because at best they are SECOND BEST.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. Here's your explanation...

Imagine the EXACT same story.... but with Duval Patrick playing the role of Eliot Spitzer.


Now...

Tell me how many threads the Hillary supporters would be starting about how this reflects badly on Obama?


10?

50?

100?



That's what I thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Only the asshats, similar to the ones doing it on the Obama side right now.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I doubt Hillary or any of her supporters
would be pushing a story about sex. That would be the height of hypocrisy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Then you haven't been in DU very long....


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
23. I've been here over 5 years
Let me know when Hillary goes after anyone based on a sex story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. I would guess ZERO. They seem to belong more to a party than a cult.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. My first question was almost who is Duval Patrick. You can tell how much I care about
this primary season and the supporters of the candidates.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Governor of Massachusetts and Obama supporter....


Duval Patrick is to Obama what Spitzer is to Clinton.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #19
31. Please stop misspelling his name
So many DUers do. It's Deval.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
24. What wlucinda said. ie: people like you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. Rampant irrationality
The emotionally out-there radical DU supporters of each candidate are desperate to find some type of shit that will stick and leave a lasting stench on the candidate they oppose. Anything and everything is fair game to them, reason and logic aside.

All should just "simmah-down". Six degrees or closer by association does not impugn guilt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
11. Way to rock with the sexist language there
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
13. Guilt through association is all Bull Shit. Clinton people have linked Obama to his supporters so..
Now Hillary is linked to one of her supporters


It is all wrong and should not happen, but turn about is fair play. Let's just hope it ends here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthernSpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
14. the point, since you've yet to grasp it...
... is that tainted associations is a game that two can play. And mind you, I haven't tried to make any partisan hay out of the Spitzer affair -- quite the opposite.


What sticks in the Obamian craw is this: there WAS NO association between Obama and Farrakhan, and Hillary knew it. Farrakhan said something nice about Obama, and that was it.


And with the help of the media, the Clinton camp made Obama actually responsible for what some loose cannon on the fringes of the political spectrum happened to say about him. That was dirty pool.


In response, some people have decided to respond by playing the tainted associations game with Clinton's supporters. Unlike Farrakhan, Spitzer at least is an actual associate of Hillary's -- so they're already being more fair in that regard.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. So, that means that um....when Coulter endoursed Hillary you felt the same way...right?
You didn't give a fuck. Right? You saw it for what it was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. Exactly... and Obama didn't say anything about it....


But Hillary beat Obama over the head with Farrakhan.....


Double-standard.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. No.. You'd compare the Coulter endorsement of Clinton to Rush's just about endorsement of Obama.
See


Pundit-pundit
Governor-governor

Farrakhan does not compare to Coulter.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
16. Calling a "john" a bigot is an insult to the john.

You are correct. The Farrakahn and McClurkin comparison is total bullshit. What Spitzer did is nothing. What those two do is repugnant.


Which is why I go for the Rezko comparison!

The IL governor is in trouble for illegal dealings with Rezko that has nothing to do with Obama.

The NY governor is in trouble for illegal dealings with prostitues that has nothing to do with Hillary.

The two big differences:

1. Obama actually had some prior experience with Rezko before he turned crook. So there is at least a tenuous link. Hillary probably had no prior experience with the prostitutes before they started hooking.

2. Hillary tried linking Obama to Rezko. Obama has not -- and presumably will not -- make such a link between Hillary and the hookers.

That last is why I feel free to make the Rezko comparison. She asked for it.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. But shouldn't you compare it t someting remotely similar? Like that law firm she worked for?
The Spitzer prostitute and McClurking Farrakahn thing just doesn't work.

I'm not saying not to do it. I'm just saying pick something remotely similar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. Going with what's in the news today.

No, that isn't it. For the longest time I have been thinking, "isn't Hillary lucky her governor isn't in trouble".

So when it happened ... just trying to be an instrument of Karma here, baby.

:evilgrin:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. But, isn't that wishing bad luck on a Democrat who is actually a pretty good guy.
I cannot believe a DUer would wish that on a Democratic Govenor.

Oh, I get it. Dem governors who support Obama good. Dem governors who support Hillary bad.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. No, I don't wish bad luck on Spitzer.

I feel sorry for him and would like to see him weather this storm and stay on.

But that doesn't mean I can not have a little fun at Hillary's expense. I have not actually said anything bad about Spitzer. All I have done today is repeatedly state that if Hillary can blame Obama for Gov Blagojevich's illegalities, then it would be just as fair for Obama to blame Hillary for Gov Spitzer's illegalities.

He won't. Because a stupid thing for her to say would be just as stupid for him to say.


Though I won't go so far as to say I feel sorry for Blagojevich and would like to see him weather his storm and stay on. Voting for Blagojevich's second term is the worst vote I have ever made in my life. Not because of the Rezko thing -- I will actually be a little surprised if Blagojevich is guilty of anything as he started his administration by going after some corruption in his own party -- but because of the competence thing. He has been an amazing disaster his second term. And the signs were there in the first term, but like the Clintons in the 90s, I was too busy defending him from the bullshit to see the real shit.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
20. Yep
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
22. For the same reason that the ref is always making calls against your team
and never against the other team: you are blinded by your non-objectivity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femmedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
26. It relates to Farrakhan only in that neither Farrakhan nor Spitzer
have much to do with either candidate's credibility. It's unfair to smear Obama with Farrakhan and it's unfair to smear Clinton with Spitzer.

McClurkin is different. Obama shouldn't have gone there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #26
37. The fact a bigot like Farrakhan feels comfortable with Obama in and of itself is news
Just like David Duke endorsing Pat Buchanan a few years ago when he ran for president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
28. it makes many of them feel better about their homophobia...others could care less. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
32. I guess you couldn't afford college, huh
Who the hell ever said Farrakhan and McClurkin are like Spitzer? You? WTF?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
34. Because Some Here Are So Biased, That They've Become Highly Ignorant And Thoroughly Incapable Of
using any critical thinking skills. Their attacks are relentless, over hyped, and so frequently make them appear almost delusional. That's why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
35. I don't know. But why did Hillary take his endorsement off her website?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
36. Must be someone I have on "Ignore".
I haven't seen this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
38. Because they're Hillary supporters who mention Rezko, Farrakhan, and McClurkin every 3 minutes?
It's like some kind of version of Tourette's syndrom that causes constant smearing outbursts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malik flavors Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
39. Farrakahn and Obama don't even know each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
40. I can't because it doesn't make any sense -
however, I don't think Farrakhan and McClurkin are as important in this country as people would like to think they are.

Spitzer is actually a Governor of a large state, his actions (in his job, not his motel room) affect people who both support him and not, he runs their state no matter what they say or think.

Farrakhan and McClurkin affect those who choose to follow/support him, not those who don't. Unless you are on DU, then they rule the universe, apparently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC