Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The nasiest campaign I can recall in my entire lifetime

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:36 PM
Original message
The nasiest campaign I can recall in my entire lifetime
Upon both camps a POX.

How remote are the chances the party and the party faithful will ultimately rally behind one candidate?

I bet a lot of people on DU will find supporting the one they now oppose a very difficult thing.

Upon both camps a POX.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. In what way has the Obama campaign been nasty??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
26. rofl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Apparently, you can't answer my simple question. No surprise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. If you're really curious, here you go:
This is also written in post #31

1) way back at one of the first debates, when Hillary was asked about the driver's licenses for illegals, Obama attacked her for taking "both sides" of the issue, when she was explaining that, for her, it wasn't a simple yes or no answer. Never mind that Obama gave the same convoluted answer she did. He said something along the lines of "this is what bothers people about Senator Clinton" she takes both sides of an issue. So, a character attack as well. This was long before Hillary ever attacked him on anything.

2) the entire race baiting stuff that his campaign pushed after New Hampshire. Emailing reporters and telling that the "fairytale" comment and Hillary's "Lyndon Johnson" comment were racist, when they clearly were not. Read Sean Wilentz's entire piece in the New Republic. It's very depressing that a good woman got so unfairly smeared.

3) the debate where he angrily lashed out at her about sitting on the "board of Walmart" while he was nobly serving his community.

4) the latest salvos from Plouffe and Co., where the Obama campaign basically calls Hillary a crook. "unethical""the most secretive politician in the country" etc etc.

Hope that helps. I won't respond to anything you write in response to this, because I am sure you will come up with various excuses for this behaviour. But, you asked what Obama has done in this campaign to poison the atmosphere, so I thought I'd answer your question
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hieronymus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. Stuck for an answer, I see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. actually, i've posted it in two different posts in this thread
want a third?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
42. actually, the millions of voters out there voting don't know about the
loons on this board or care. Most people, 99% live their lives unaware that people are kicking each other on this board. Rally behind a candidate? Who knows in the bigger world that there is a split.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WHEN CRABS ROAR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. How old are you? Chicago 68, that was a peach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Probably older than you
I used to hang with Methuselah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WHEN CRABS ROAR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Got me beat. Only 66.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. I was wrong
You're older
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. What nastiness directly from Obama?
Its been one sided as far as I have seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. That's easy to say, but can you list them? What's the 4 rottenest things the Obama campaign has done
and the 4 rottenest things the Clinton Campaign has done. Thanks, I'd like to see what you consider to be nasty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. i've been waiting for that list as well.
there is no doubt which campaign is the pooflinging one, yet Obama gets lumped into Hillary's manure pile. CNN, for one, has been spouting this on and on and on.

apparently Obama disagreeing with some of Hillary's past policies/votes and making comparison between his solutions and hers - is as 'dirty' politics as calling him a muslim drug dealer incompetent empty suit.

wretched.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. I will wait a little longer, it hasn't been that long. And I'd like to see a well thought out list
for both campaigns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
31. Here I'll give it a stab
1) way back at one of the first debates, when Hillary was asked about the driver's licenses for illegals, Obama attacked her for taking "both sides" of the issue, when she was explaining that, for her, it wasn't a simple yes or no answer. Never mind that Obama gave the same convoluted answer she did. He said something along the lines of "this is what bothers people about Senator Clinton" she takes both sides of an issue. So, a character attack as well. This was long before Hillary ever attacked him on anything.

2) the entire race baiting stuff that his campaign pushed after New Hampshire. Emailing reporters and telling that the "fairytale" comment and Hillary's "Lyndon Johnson" comment were racist, when they clearly were not. Read Sean Wilentz's entire piece in the New Republic. It's very depressing that a good woman got so unfairly smeared.

3) the debate where he angrily lashed out at her about sitting on the "board of Walmart" while he was nobly serving his community.

4) the latest salvos from Plouffe and Co., where the Obama campaign basically calls Hillary a crook. "unethical""the most secretive politician in the country" etc etc.

Hope that helps. I won't respond to anything you write in response to this, because I am sure you will come up with various excuses for this behaviour. But, you asked what Obama has done in this campaign to poison the atmosphere, so I thought I'd answer your question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. It was the Clintons who were doing the racebaiting - get it straight!
Because we were all watching as Bubba and his boys attacked Obama for not being "Martin Luther King".

Bubba will go down in history as the biggest Democratic racist since George Wallace!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #31
44. I asked for a list ot he 4 nastiest things done by both campaigns. Way to make it one sided
If those are the nastiest things you percieve, then I would have to say that it hasn't been a nasty campaign, at least from the Obama side.

I would take exception with only #2. I don't believe you have related how it happened, but I have to run now. Gotta take the youngest to wrestling practice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. Once again we are racing pell mell to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.
:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. 1980, 1984 weren't walks in the park.
Kennedy helped to bring down a sitting Democratic president -and Mondale (a loser from the outset) used scorched earth and superdelegates to guarantee a Reagan landslide.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smelting Pot Donating Member (109 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. I keep hearing that from different people on here.
However, I have yet to hear a solid accusation of "nastiness" from the Obama campaign. NOT the Obama supporters, some of who should take their meds a bit more seriously than they do. But, please, can you tell me what dirty, underhanded, despicable tricks the Obama campaign have been up to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. Mission Accomplished, Hillary
That's the ultimate goal of negative campaigning: suppress enthusiasm and depress turnout. I never thought I'd see it employed by one alleged Democrat to undermine another.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
10. Which stage of grief over Hillary's Orwellian campaign turn are you in?
Are you seriously alleging that Obama's campaign has been just as "nasty" to Hillary as Hillary's has been to Obama?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CyberPieHole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
30. Q.E.D.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yeah, like DU has anything to do with the actual campaigns.
And who are you to be in such a lofty position to judge everyone else here on DU?

Why don't you focus on what the candidates themselves are saying?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
13. As Howard Dean stated recently, Nobody's face's have morphed into Osama Bin Laden yet
or vice versa, I dont remember
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pbca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
14. According to this
Over 80% will support Obama if he's the nominee and ALMOST 30% will support Hillary

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x5005702
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. Oh, come on now. Our polls are even less scientific that the real ones,
which often aren't worth a damn.

Who knows? But both are likely to be damaged goods by the time of the general election and neither will be able to depend upon having a united party for the campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #14
35. That's a DU poll with 78 responses.
I wouldn't put a lot of stake in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pbca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #35
45. No not much
But I think it says something about the kind of division that is occurring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. Take a look at this one.
http://people-press.org/reports/pdf/398.pdf

I think things in the real world are a lot less divided than they are here at DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damonm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
15. Then you haven't lived long.
Dukakis-Bush 88.
Gephardt-Dean 04.
Dole-Bush 88.

Just off the top of my head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thevoiceofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
17. You are older than that.
Mondale/Hart/Jackson and the whole 1968 campaigns come to mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. I remember them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
22. Compared to 1980, this is patty cake
Selective memory. In the 1980 Texas state convention, Carter and Kennedy people were hitting each other with chairs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. They're stabbing each other over this one, and within the family at that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #23
43. OMG, what a story!!!
Shurelds said he and his brother-in-law were watching the Feb. 21 debate between Obama and Clinton.

The two were at Shurelds' Collegeville home.

Shurelds said he thought Obama was winning the debate.

"I got excited and I constantly get excited over him," he said.

But in the midst of the excitement, violence erupted.

"Just out of nowhere the next thing I know I'm bleeding," Shurelds said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
24. If you wish a pox on both camps, isn't that really rooting for McCain?
Take that crap elsewhere
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Good one. *high five*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #24
49. No, that doesn't follow
I'll just leave 'that crap' right here in cesspool central.

But .... nice try.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
25. Barack has done very little in this regard accpet defendhis record. HRC instigates and divides.
Edited on Mon Mar-10-08 05:56 PM by cooolandrew
It's getting a little irritating when it is made to look that Brack is geting just as dirty he has only ever defeneded his record then moved on and talked of McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. I agree- people seem to be confusing posters on DU with Obama-
There have been some really offensive posts from people who claim to support Obama, but his campaign has been a pretty above board and clean.


peace~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democraticscapegoat Donating Member (19 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #29
39. Are you kidding me?
How long have you been around? This has been childsplay so far........WOW, there are some people with some really soft skin around here!

Oh by the HI!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Not the Only One Donating Member (617 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
37. Why should I give Hillary a pass for all that she's done?
Hillary is the person who gave us all the pox-infected blankets.

Obama has conducted himself honorably.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
38. Hillary's I can see... Obama's??? Not so much
the nastiest thing his campaign has done was some advisor calling Hillary a monster. Oh dear.

For Hillary the list of insults, smears, distortions, lies, and slurs are too numerous to list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
40. Honestly, I think the Kerry/Dean battle was much worse?
"Bush light vs. terrorist sympathizer." Then again, we're back their today huh? UGH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
41. It's just really ugly here.
I think both candidates have run pretty clean campaigns. I know some don't agree with me, but I do not see either as having been nasty. I have seen supporters here be very nasty and incredibly hyper-sensitive to anything the candidate other than their own says.

And don't give up hope. Most democrats are willing to vote for either candidate and are not bothered by the continuation of this battle. In fact, according to this poll, they see it as good for the party:

http://people-press.org/reports/pdf/398.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
46. '68 made me a DINO.
Which has proved a blessing to my nose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calico1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
48. I was a kid in '68,
just 10. But I do remember the billy clubs, beatings, riots during the '68 convention. And I also recall 1980 being pretty ugly. One of our "talents" as Democrats seems to be making it easier for Republicans by fighting amongst ourselves instead of fighting them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #48
50. "One of our "talents" as Democrats seems to be ....... "
"....... making it easier for Republicans by fighting amongst ourselves instead of fighting them."

You'd think we'd have learned by now. But oh no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calicat Donating Member (91 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
51. You're either very young or have a very short memory n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC