Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How can anyone defend Hillary at this point?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Monty__ Donating Member (352 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:18 PM
Original message
How can anyone defend Hillary at this point?
Even if you supported her from the beginning and still think she would make a good president....how in the world can you support her? The list of Rovian tactics is absurdly long, the list of absolute BS she has said, Bill has said, her supporters have said (Ferraro, etc.). Asking Obama to be her VP? The nerve...the audacity, the arrogance, the stubborness. I'm just shocked. I knew she was power hungry but this is absurd. She prefers McCain. She'll trust Obama that he's not a Muslim.

Look, I was and still consider myself to be an Edwards man. After SC I actually was split. I didn't like some of Obama's comments in the debate, etc. I still don't feel the emotional tie to Obama that I did to Edwards but this has gone too far. My state has already voted but I'm going to donate right now to Obama. Hillary must be stopped.

Sorry for the rant but I'm now that fed up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Blind loyatly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Blind, deaf AND dumb loyalty!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Medusa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. And stupidity?
just a guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
31. Lol - AND denial! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itcfish Donating Member (805 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
118. Obama Supporters Have
been royally duped, I don't think you should be calling anyone stupid!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
42. Please
Edited on Tue Mar-11-08 08:42 PM by bonito
That term is very hurting, both my parents were deaf and were referred to as such when I was young ;(
and farther than the truth as one could be. Peace

on edit, some back round info on the term.http://www.nad.org/site/pp.asp?c=foINKQMBF&b=103786
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. I was actually referring to blind, deaf and dumb loyalty...
Edited on Tue Mar-11-08 08:47 PM by polichick
...in the sense of not seeing, not hearing and not speaking up about what the campaign is doing. No offense toward the deaf intended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loyalsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #42
114. Thanks for speaking up
People rarely speak out about the way some language is carelessly used because it has been accepted for so long.
Referring to some deficit or general disfunction with language that is representative of real disability has been embedded in our culture and language for such a long time that it is difficult to get people to stop and think about what it may actually mean to a person who has the disability. I am troubled by the way the word "spineless" is used.

It is uncomfortable to stop and consider the possibility that for a very long time we may have been hurting people's feelings. It's easier to deny it and defend thoughts and behavior. We see it with racism, sexism, and any other stereotype.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #114
124. It was never considered a disability but normal
Being one of five siblings we faired well, and in some regards better than most, active interpersonal relationships with fewer words, a finer tuning to situations, body language, eyes mostly, with sight only, it can be helpfull at times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loyalsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #124
127. I understand what you're saying.
"Disability" is a word that has some different implications. For many people it's a very offensive word.
For some, having a "disability" is just belonging to a club where people have physical, sensory, emotional, cognitive, etc differences. So that they fall away from the classic categorization of "normal." The label disability has been imposed by society.
Some people hate it, some people own it.

Just as you said, the reality is that the experience of difference is simply a normal human experience.
People can even gain strengths through intimate familiarity with their weaknesses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #127
129. Lol I understand
More times than not silence is golden, but I can see where it can be a weakness as well, interesting subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quantass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 03:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
83. Lol, you guys always make me laugh! Cheers!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Hillary wins the big states and the Clinton era was the best in history
Hillary's opponent is just a male model reading some other guy's speeches about hope and bullshit like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Nice GOP talking points there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. "Clinton era was the best in history"?
wow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
80. LOL!!!!
Most Excellent!!!

:rofl:
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BornBlue Donating Member (278 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
93. and. . .
She is just the former first lady, who has been involved in more scandals pertaining to her "judgment" then I care to even think about. I trust the guy who speeches are inspiring and has a relatively clean record, over the woman who has proven she has no integrity left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
102. John McCain....is that you?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
103. are you nuts?
Yes, it was good in the '90's but there were also a lot of VERY BAD decisions that set us back and gave us Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. they belong to a cult?
denying reason, insulting anyone who disagrees with them to include previously respected members of the media (Keith O).......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I don't want to agree with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
22. You're talking about Obama supporters, right?
Because that is the way many of us see Obama supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuiderelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. You people are so histrionic.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monty__ Donating Member (352 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. We're histrionic?
Is that a diagnosis?

And....if you disagree, defend her. Right here, right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuiderelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
24. Why, yes histrionic. That's my assessment.
:shrug:

I have no need to defend Hillary. She doesn't need my defense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monty__ Donating Member (352 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #24
36. So you're ok with what she's done?
And with the way her campaign is being run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuiderelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #36
44. I'm not "ok" with what either one has done. But Obama represents more of a threat to my equality.
And that's the only difference I can see between the two. I don't need to defend anyone. I'm just choosing the one who will represent my priorities in a more productive and supportive way. As opposed to the one who would let his religion dictate his decisions in that regard and has exhibited that he is incapable of changing that. Pretty simple choice actually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monty__ Donating Member (352 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #44
51. So you have no problem...
with someone who would rather have a Republican in the White House if she can't win herself?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuiderelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #51
87. I have a problem with people who spin words into something they never were.
Which you just did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monty__ Donating Member (352 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #87
131. I'm not spinning words
that's my assessment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeaLyons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #51
95. OMG....get real
stop posting just to hear yourself type. Hillary is a DEMOCRAT - what you just said is a lie and makes no sense (and you know it).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monty__ Donating Member (352 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #95
105. Then tell her to act for the good of the party
her actions are meant for one thing and one thing only. A Hillary nomination. If not, she's giving the election to McCain. You get real and step back and look at it without your Hillary colored glasses on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeaLyons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #105
109. No, you're wrong again...
Edited on Wed Mar-12-08 10:26 AM by cricket08
she is running for the nomination for the good of this country. Her passion in getting universal health care passed is what gets her up in the morning. Her entire adult life has been spent giving to this country. Trust me, my glasses are clear, and Hillary gets my support all the way to the White House. Don't give me that McCain crap. I don't buy it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monty__ Donating Member (352 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #109
120. Of course you don't buy it
Edited on Wed Mar-12-08 04:38 PM by Monty__
How good is McCain's healthcare plan? Hillary doesn't seem to mind it since what's she's doing is hurting the chances for a Dem to be elected.....and opening the door for Bush III.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #109
122. You should know that Clinton really lost trust from the Obama supporters when
she belittled, insulted and mocked them in the RI speech where she did that "celestial" thing as she mocked his message of hope and change. That really turned me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:58 AM
Response to Reply #44
81. What equality?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuiderelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #81
88. What equality? Are you kidding? Marriage equality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #88
106. Keep an eye
On this one. Seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuiderelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #106
110. Thanks for the tip.
Added...

;) Keep your enemies closer and all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #88
113. What are you talking about?
Is there some equality that you now have that he threatens??

If your statement is about gay marriage, it's a specious argument at best; Perhaps a misunderstanding of what a President is capable of and what he/she is NOT capable of. At worst it is just a straw man argument you can use to be mad all the time and focus your rage on Obama for your inability to move this culture towards acceptance.

I would have given you the right to marry 30 years ago. Anything less than full rights under the Constitution is completely unacceptable to me.

Not even "The Monster" can herd Congress into acceptance of gay marriage when the Fake Christian Nascar dad asshole mentality is the predominant 'culture' here.

An effort at the local level might be the best way to go: How many states need to have a legal acceptance of gay marriage to create the overwhelming argument for a national law for it? When the rednecks and dipshits complain, tell them your argument is about STATES' RIGHTS. The right wingers respond to that phrase like it's porn.

If you think Hillary Clinton is going to do a fucking bit more for you than Obama as President, I believe you are sadly mistaken. At least neither Democratic candidate will offer a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage.

You can say that if Obama was serious about Gay Rights he'd disavow Mcclurkin or whatever his name is, and maybe that's so.

But blaming Obama on an internet message board for not having all your civil rights just seems a little too easy, a little lazy and quite disingenuous. Hiring some asshat singer who cannot face his own sexuality is a little short of the homophobe mark, isn't it?

My landlord really is a homophobe. I hate him for that but support him with money because I like living on the two acres I live on. What does that make me? One thing it makes me is someone with deer and a bobcat wandering through my front yard. Where do I draw the line? I won't tolerate homophobic remarks by my family or friends but I also need a place to live.

I say, if You're serious about getting what you want, and you're so fucking mad, get your ass out on the barricades NOW and fight for it. That's what happened at Stonewall, isn't it? Sending nasty comments to an internet message board is something anyone with a beef and DSL can accomplish.

Changing the law and the view of the American public will take more work. I'm with you until the baby gets tossed with the bath water, logically speaking.


Oh, yeah, that comment about "keeping and eye on this one"? Do it, you might learn something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuiderelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #113
119. The choice is between someone who believes that we should have equality and one who doesn't.
It doesn't require so many words to explain it, really. He has stated that his religious beliefs cause him to be opposed to gay marriage. That's really all I need to hear. I don't want a president who allows his religion to dictate anything. And definitely not one who will absolutely stand in the way of progress for my civil rights.

Who's sending nasty comments, anyway? And who's mad here? Sounds like you are dissembling.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #119
121. OOOOPS!!!
PelosiFan - I was responding to another post and hit reply on yours instead. I was wrong and I apologize for the challenge....except for the line you agreed with about 'keeping an eye on this one"

This one what??

I am not your enemy. I just want fact based discourse, or at least arguments based on reality.....

I am unaware of any current statement by him that categorically rejects gay marriage.

You wouldn't have a link to a current statement by Obama concerning his stance in this matter, would you?


Dissembling? Hardly. Creative insult, though.

I still think thinking nationally and working locally is the way to do it, without giving the white house back to the fucking republicants.

But then again, your mileage may vary.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blondiegrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #119
125. Hillary doesn't support gay marriage either.
And what about that farcical "don't ask, don't tell" policy during Billy's reign? That to me was an insult to gays.

I wish Obama supported gay marriage.

I wish Hillary supported gay marriage.

But neither of them do. They support civil unions. If gay marriage is the single most important issue to you, then you should have been backing Dennis Kucinich or Mike Gravel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuiderelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #125
138. Thanks for the condescending post.
No, gay marriage is not the single most important issue to me, but since both of them are equal aside from that one issue, then it does rise to the top. I would back Dennis Kucinich if he was in the race still. Did you know that he is not?

Barack has clearly shut the door to gay marriage because of his religion, and Hillary has left it open, if ever so slightly. I also believe that by now she would have apologized for having someone like McClurkin speak for her. But we'll never know. All I know is that he has not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuiderelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #36
45. dupe
Edited on Tue Mar-11-08 08:43 PM by PelosiFan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. Pelosi has been a HUGE disappointment & Clinton absolutely disgusts me at this point
Ferraro slammed Jesse Jackson when he was running for president by saying basically the same thing she just said about Obama, and of course we all know how "lucky" it is to be born as anything OTHER than pure WHITE in America.... :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuiderelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. Ferraro is not Clinton. You people keep insisting that McClurkin is not Obama.
What's good for the geese and all that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #21
49. "you people"? I have never supported McClurkins statements... I have always been a vocal supporter
of GLBT rights and EQUALITY for all.

Nice attempt at a smear though...

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuiderelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #49
90. Too bad that your candidate doesn't share your support for equality.
Edited on Wed Mar-12-08 08:55 AM by PelosiFan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monty__ Donating Member (352 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #21
60. You people?
I'm an Edwards supporter who has been pushed into the Obama camp by Clinton's tactics and those of her "people".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuiderelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #60
94. And I was pushed to Hillary's camp because of Obama's anti-gay rights issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monty__ Donating Member (352 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. Still waiting
for the defense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuiderelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. For what, are you boiling water?
Edited on Tue Mar-11-08 08:29 PM by PelosiFan
Two minutes waiting? You're a bit impatient aren't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monty__ Donating Member (352 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #27
54. And still no logical defense
Edited on Tue Mar-11-08 08:58 PM by Monty__
just as I thought
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nebula Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:24 PM
Original message
Overdosed on the Kool-aid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
9. I Don't Know, She's Pretty Disgusting!!!!!!
Some people wear blinders when it comes to seeing what they cannot accept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. If a third of what you wrote was true I'd agree with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monty__ Donating Member (352 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
23. So what's not true?
please, someone defend her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
13. They don't care about the party or the nation, only what they want. Pure selfishness at it's worst
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ExtraGriz Donating Member (405 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
34. i think this apply to both sides
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #34
48. I disagree, Sen. Obama is not doing anything to harm our party's chances in the GE
Unlike Hillary praising McCain.... (among other things)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZsYWiywdCA&feature=related
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LVjinx Donating Member (711 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #48
123. "Hillary Clinton is a liar who will say anything" won't be used against her in the GE?
You are really, truly, out of your mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaptBunnyPants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
14. They'll find a way.
nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
16. Pat Buchanan is on MSNBC defending her and Ferraro
He's always a great one to have on your side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. I think Monty meant any Dem
Edited on Tue Mar-11-08 08:26 PM by Johnny__Motown
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monty__ Donating Member (352 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #18
30. Sort of
I meant any real Hillary supporter. I know why Pat and Rush are "supporting" her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ExtraGriz Donating Member (405 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #30
40. dont she have half the democratic primary votes?
so what you just said is pointless and irrelevant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #40
50. not quite half.. the point is that she is despicable and an embarrassment to all of us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monty__ Donating Member (352 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #40
57. No
First she doesn't and second did you know that a lot of Republicans voted for Clinton in Texas and probably other places as well?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #57
67. I agree, she does not have half.... wtf was that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #16
43. yeah, a white supremacist on your side is GREAT NEWS FOR HILLARY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
17. Narcissism
She has it and her supporters are catching it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
20. I was just commenting about this...I voted for Hillary in the WA
caucus...but I can't understand how her campaign continues to make blunder after blunder.

I do believe Geraldine Ferraro should be fired her comments are much worse than the women who just stepped down from Obama's campaign.

I knew in my heart that the race card would be played by the Republicans I just didn't expect it from one of our Democratic Candidates. I say that because Hillary is not going to ask for Geraldine Ferraro's resignation or fire her. And then to add more to my dismay they send out Hillary's black campaign manager to attack Obama defending himself.



I am not blinded by loyalty to either candidate, the bottom line to me is that the Democratic party win. I don't agree that winning at all cost by destroying the reputation of the other Democratic competitor is the way to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janetblond Donating Member (437 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #20
28. And that DESPICABLE SENILE Geraldine Ferraro
what a racist ol' bitty!
I will NEVER vote for Billary!
SHAME on THEM!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #20
38. Agreed.. it's these tactics that put me in Obama's camp...
And agreed that the party needs to win. I'll still vote for Hillary if she gets the nom but she's looking like more of the same as each day passes. I believe these tactics are costing her more supporters than it's gaining her...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
americanstranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
25. Short answer - no, they cannot.
But they'll give you a double helping of 'You're a sexist' in place of any cogent defense.

They seem to be turning into rage-aholics. Not all of them, but a damn good number of them.

- as
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
26. Pantsuit fetishists?
The just won't come clean about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
29. (((rovian tactics))) (((rovian tactics))) (((rovian tactics)))

welcome to DU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
32. Welcome to DU!
:hi:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taxmyth Donating Member (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
33. Still supporting Hillary here
She can win the General Election and Senator Obama cannot. Probably the biggest reason I'm still in her camp. I don't see Senator Obama drawing the votes from traditional GOP voters the way I do her. Sex and Race play huge roles in this election cycle and anyone who denies that is, well, in denial. About 90% of my family are staunch GOP supporters and I hear what they say fairly often - the men say no to Senators Clinton and Obama (and the language they use would get me banned). But many of the women WOULD cross over and vote for Senator Clinton.

Yeah, so my family is screwed up, you don't have to tell me that. But I don't think they're much different than many other families from the baby boom generation who make up a large portion of American voters.

A President Obama might be good, but it ain't gonna happen.

A President McCain would suck

A President Clinton would suck less and is actually doable.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #33
58. Welcome to DU!
While I disagree with your assessment (I think BO can win and HRC doesn't stand a chance), I appreciate that you have thought about the matter and made a rational argument from your perspective.

Hang tough. This place can get a little rough.

:toast:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taxmyth Donating Member (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #58
64. a big Thank You!
Reasonable people can have reasonable differences of opinion but we all want the same things in the end and they are a Democratic Party President and a majority in the House and Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monty__ Donating Member (352 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #33
62. Based on what?
She's awake at 3am waiting for the phone to ring to talk to the foreign leaders who were in power when Bill was President? Wonder how long she's going to sit in the Oval Office waiting for Yeltsin to call. Or Tony Blair, or Yasser Arafat, or ....notice the trend?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taxmyth Donating Member (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #62
63. If you are suggesting
that Senator Obama has more foreign contacts or more current contacts, I haven't been made aware of that information. Frankly, the scenario you described leaves the two Senators with about the same experience level though I would give Senator Clinton the SLIGHT advantage from her years in the White House and her longer tenure as a Senator of the United States.

It comes down to elect-ability. I don't see Senator Obama as drawing traditional GOP voters across party lines in the same numbers that Senator Clinton will. This theory is based on anecdotal evidence, granted. Bottom line, Senator Clinton CAN be elected as President of the United States and if she is the Democratic Party nominee, will be. Senator Obama cannot be elected. This is opinion, not fact, and I'm not ashamed when my opinions are proven wrong. If he's the nominee, he has my vote. But in my opinion he will not have enough others voting for him to beat Senator McCain.

I want a Democratic President, either Senators Clinton or Obama. Neither would be my first choice but these are the choices I have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monty__ Donating Member (352 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #63
65. Wow
You seriously think Hillary can draw Repubs? They've hated her for going on 15+ years now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taxmyth Donating Member (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:24 AM
Response to Reply #65
77. She sure can
As I was saying earlier, I have heard from more than a few women in my family and elsewhere, traditional GOP voters, that they would vote for Hillary. Granted, they say this out of earshot of their significant others and their reasons are totally sexist but these are words I have NEVER heard these people utter.

The men? No how, no way. But that's for either of the two Democratic Party candidates. It's the secret ballot process that will get Senator Clinton a share of Republican voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monty__ Donating Member (352 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #77
133. And what about the one's you haven't spoken to?
Look at Hillary's unfavorables in the polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BornBlue Donating Member (278 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #33
98. I disagree, but respect you well thought out response
Too many republicans HATE Hillary, and they will come out in droves to make sure she can't win. I come from a very similar family, I am the lone liberal, but my folks have said if Obama is the dem nominee, they will sit this one out, if Hillary is they will vote for McCain. I think that is something that we all need to consider when we talk about electability in the GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeaLyons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #33
101. Great Post and I agree with you....
welcome to DU.


:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progdog Donating Member (435 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
35. Name recognition?
That's the only reason I can think of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
37. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DesertFlower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
39. i always said that if she were the nominee
i would support her. after her 5 endorsements of McCain last week, i decided that i can't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:39 PM
Original message
The same loyalty that keeps Bush at a 19% approval rating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
41. How can anyone defend Obama?
His dirty tricks campaigning, reminiscent of the GOP is incredibly offensive and is not winning him any voters. Women voters are turning away from him.

His divisiveness and refusal to campaign on the issues is hurting him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ExtraGriz Donating Member (405 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #41
47. latinos, asians and glbt have turned away from him also
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monty__ Donating Member (352 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #41
66. If Obama is divisive....
What is Clinton, at least as far as the Party goes? She's basically said McCain is better suited to being president than Obama. This means she doesn't care if a Republican is elected if she's not the nominee. That's unacceptable. If that's the way she believes let her start her own party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
52. It's easy when you believe the accusations made against her by Mr. "Hope" supporters ...
...are little more than crybaby temper tantrums.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDeathadder Donating Member (731 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
53. Comparing Clinton to Rove is bullshit
and the more Obama (and Edwards) people say it the more it's turning Clinton people off to Obama. With all the vile and terrible things Rove has done, I have a hard time seeing Obama people as Democrats when they compare her to Rove.

It's total bullshit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monty__ Donating Member (352 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #53
68. Really?
So the 3am ad was nothing like the "Wolves" ad run against Kerry in '04?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 03:21 AM
Response to Reply #53
84. So last week when the Clinton CAMPAIGN compared Obama to Rove
what did you think about that? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grassfed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
55. How to defend Hillary
I support and defend Hillary's vote against Amendment No. 4882 because I approve of the use of cluster bombs in civilian areas.

I support and defend Hillary's vote in favor of Bankruptcy bill (S.256) because some people in debt should not be protected.

I support and defend Hillary's vote in favor of the "Iraq War Resolution: Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002" for an unprovoked illegal war on Iraq.

I support and defend Hillary's vote in favor of the Kyle/Lieberman bill because the US should take unprovoked military action against Iran.

I support and defend Hillary's vote in favor of the USA PATRIOT Act to enhance law enforcement investigatory tools, and for other purposes which include the detention of US citizens without trial and prosecution of non-terrorist alleged future crimes such as "eco terrorism" and "animal rights terrorism".

I support and defend Hillary's refusal to sign the AFC Anti-Torture Pledge because Americans should be allowed to torture.



I'm curious to see how many Hillary supporters can rebut this without mentioning Obama.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #55
61. Oh, but they will mention and blame Obama
Hillary has never taken responsibility for her actions and she always blames others for her failures. This is characteristic trait of a sociopath. Bush is like that, and so is Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #55
96. Your post desrves its own thread... HRC supporters on this thread will ignore you....
Seriously. Straight forward and to the point. Posts like yours are almost always ignored by her supporters as there simply is no defense.

Great post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grassfed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #96
108. ok i'll post it as a thread
thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
56. Rovian tactics: Though the chant is repeated, not an instance is cited.
Calling hardball Rovian does not make it so. Equating Clinton to Rove is ludicrous.

She prefers McCain: Complete bullshit. Saying he has more experience is not expressing a preference in the GE.

She'll trust Obama that he's not a Muslim: By this I take it you are inferring that he implied he is. More nonsense.

Asking Obama to be her VP: Look again. She never asked him. Floating the idea is political, not arrogant.

I'm just shocked: I'm sure you are. Here are your winnings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monty__ Donating Member (352 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #56
71. How hard is it to understand?
Let's look at the points you raise:

1. Equating Clinton to Rove is ludicrous.
Her 3am ad is right up Rove's alley....very similar fear mongering to the "wolves" ad in '04

2.he prefers McCain: Complete bullshit. Saying he has more experience is not expressing a preference in the GE
Again, way to miss the point. She might not favor McCain but she certainly is helping him and hurting Obama in the GE. Is Clinton still a Democrat? Will she still support the Democratic nominee? Why is she giving fuel to the Republicans? Let them figure it out on their own. Does she care about winning so badly that she's willing to take down the party with her and leave America with 4 more years of Bush...err McCain.

3. She'll trust Obama that he's not a Muslim: By this I take it you are inferring that he implied he is. More nonsense.
Again, you miss the point or bigger picture. How hard would it have been to say "No he's not a Muslim"? Saying what she said does not close the door on this point. It says "well he's not because he said he's not". It doesn't say "He is not, because it's a fact that he's not" And if you think I'm plying with words here you're wrong. There's a reason she didn't come out and say "He's not a Muslim, period, fact, end of story".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InAbLuEsTaTe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
59. It never ceases to amaze me how real Dems can defend Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
69. Oh they'll find a way
Right now they're reeling in shock because they're SO disconnected from reality that they're stunned at how America is rejecting their racism but they'll be back. Give it one or two more sunsets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
70. you asked.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monty__ Donating Member (352 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #70
72. No you did not defend Hillary
you merely tried to bash Obama. Defend Hillary's actions and the actions of her supporters like Ferraro.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #70
73. LOL. A cartoon is all you got.
In other words, you ain't got nothing to defend the pandering, cowardly, craven H. Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #70
99. Yep, that's how I feel about him too.
All stalk and no action (nor experience).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
74. Ask her
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monty__ Donating Member (352 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #74
75. Yeah, no thanks
she's so 1984
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jconner27 Donating Member (356 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:22 AM
Response to Original message
76. Obama supporters will learn their lesson
Alright I have to say you Obama supporters make Bush supporters look more human all I seen lately are Obama supporters acting cult followers or worst hard-core Bush supporters if people don't tow the line of how great Obama is. If you prefer Obama over Hillary fine, but sounding like Republicans seems to rip her seems like a punk ass move to me. I admit I support Hillary Clinton but had no issues switching my support over once she lost, but fuck that I don't want to be a member of a party that demands to lose elections every two to four years. As for the comment power hungry Jesus I guess Bartcop was right Democrats have got used to losing because they don't know what a fighting campaign looks like, is this primary main function is winning? But than again when you watch boxing you don't expect one fighter working too hard to beat the other.

Another subject the talking point Obama supporters from the average Obama supporter that touches him or herself during one of his speeches to that human toad stool Randi Rhodes like to say everyday it's the math.. I'm looking at the states Hillary pulling in the major ones, Obama pulling in Republican ones. One since when did the Republicans have a say on whom the Dems picked to run for president? And two are those states really going to Obama in the fall?

If the Dems want to lose so badly, I'm going to do my part and stay home on election night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconicgnom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:45 AM
Response to Original message
78. Obama
Obama
Obama need only stay on message.

At this point he has no need to attack Hillary, or bother much about counterattacking either. Beyond setting the record straight, and reaffirming reality.

He's perfectly free to spend 100% of real-time on destroying McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:45 AM
Response to Original message
79. Too late and too tired to refute most of what you wrote.
Either way, I and millions of others (almost 13M so far) support Hillary and don't give a rat's tail end who likes it or not. On the other hand, I for one can't understand how some people can support a guy who's as slick as an oil spill and as smooth as a used car salesman.

To each his own..........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 03:02 AM
Response to Original message
82. Monty, the Clintons are not going to stop. Race is their only weapon now against Obama.
And they are using it with abandon.

Don't count on them to drop out regardless of what happens. Brace yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 04:29 AM
Response to Original message
85. Where are her tax returns?
I don't understand how someone who has blown through so much money in 3 months can call themselves "fiscally responsible".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 04:33 AM
Response to Original message
86. GO HILLARY!
!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
89. we don't believe bullshit like you just posted.
simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monty__ Donating Member (352 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #89
135. BS?....oh, you mean facts?
Edited on Wed Mar-12-08 10:10 PM by Monty__
hmmm....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Medusa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
91. How can they claim he has no experience
when he's been an elected official FAR longer than she has? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
92. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #92
100. Referring to voters you do not know as Bigots is wrong.SHAME ON YOU.


Independent-Voter (641 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Mar-12-08 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
92. Hillary's support crew is down to old, less-educated white women and bigots. That's just the facts

per the polls, period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
97. McCain told his surrogates to cease and desist immediately with unfair attacks
Edited on Wed Mar-12-08 09:16 AM by Truth Hurts A Lot
McCain has a lifetime of integrity, Obama has a lifetime of integrity... Hillary Clinton? Well, you'll just have to ask her about that. All she has is a pro-war speech in 2002... (As far as I know!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigDDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
104. "How can anyone defend Hillary at this point?"
Check with the voters of CA, TX, OH, NY, NJ, MA and all the other big states...

Don't ask in Utah, Vermont, or Idaho.
Oh, or the Democrats Abroad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monty__ Donating Member (352 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #104
107. Like the Repubs in TX that voted for Hillary?
Or the fact that many people in CA voted early and likely many would have voted for Obama if they voted on primary day?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigDDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #107
111. Right, keep tellin' yourself that
Like I said earlier today...

republican votes for Obama - Terrific!
republican votes for Hillary Terrible!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monty__ Donating Member (352 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #111
136. Well....yes
when Republicans say they're voting for Hillary because they want to face her in the GE....yes, that's terrible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeaLyons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #104
112. ,,
:thumbsup:

Go Hillary!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
115. Monty, you are starting from the wrong premise. Go back to
December 2006 most likely the first time obama played the race card. Race, said Obama,"is still a factor." Minority candidates have "a higher threshold in establishing themselves with voters." That is a laughable claim but a shrewd use of the race card to position Obama for future manipulation of the electoral process.

Skip forward to January 2008. Again, Obama played the race card, but this time blamed HRC.Who was the one person that would benefit by having dems go after dems? obama and his staff with a willing whoremedia. The Clintons had NO REASON to interject race into this campaign. "The Clinton campaign, in fact, has not racialized the campaign, and never had any reason to do so. Rather the Obama campaign and its supporters, well-prepared to play the "race-baiter card" before the primaries began, launched it with a vengeance when Obama ran into dire straits after his losses in New Hampshire and Nevada--and thereby created a campaign myth that has turned into an incontrovertible truth among political pundits, reporters, and various Obama supporters."


"A review of what actually happened shows that the charges that the Clintons played the "race card" were not simply false; they were deliberately manufactured by the Obama camp and trumpeted by a credulous and/or compliant press corps in order to strip away her once formidable majority among black voters."


Is obama running on a platform of trying to separate people?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
116. Sort weird variation on Stockholm Syndrome.
As far as I know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itcfish Donating Member (805 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
117. What is to Defend?
Do you defend Obama's admiration of Reagan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
126. Hillary's support will reach 29% at T=infinity.
That will define her base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
128. I support Hillary. She's intelligent, experienced, globally knowledgeable, articulate...
humorous, compassionate, insightful.

Twisting her words and actions doesn't make your candidate any stronger. Much of what you refer to has been debunked.

Take comfort in that your candidate is ahead and may very well may take the nomination. But until Hillary can no longer statistically win this race, I will support her. This deal is not done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rockholm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
130. EASY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
132. The Rovian tactics are being employed by the right wing against Obama and Hillary.
Invariably Drudge or some other site says "Obama is a Muslim/terrorist/Black separatist and Hillary made us say it". Then the MSM talks about it for days. This has been going on for over a year. I had better to work on my new journal "The Press v. Barack Obama" not that it will change any minds around here. Too many people want to believe that Hillary owns the corporate media . Though if she was that rich I am not sure why she would bother running for president. And they believe that Drudge and Fox and the Washington Times worship her. That is why they are always calling her a Lesbian devil worshiping bitch.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pushed To The Left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
134. Obama's my first choice, and I don't like a lot of things she has said, but she is still 1000 times
better than John McCain. We can't allow 3 more right wing Justices on the Supreme Court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monty__ Donating Member (352 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #134
137. I never once said I wouldn't support Hillary in the GE
I will vote for her if she's the nominee. That's only because I'm a Democrat. I have lost a lot of respect for the Clintons (and I spent almost my entire college career defending both of them).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC