XOKCowboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-11-08 11:05 PM
Original message |
Hillary supporters a question. Does this count as a loss? |
|
I'm confused as to what constitutes a loss to you folks.
When can we start campaigning against the Republicans instead of endorsing them?
|
HCE SuiGeneris
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-11-08 11:06 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Tue Mar-11-08 11:07 PM by BushDespiser12
|
ingac70
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-11-08 11:07 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Mississippi doesn't count. |
|
And Hillary endorses the candidate that bests matches her ideals.
:evilgrin:
|
panader0
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-11-08 11:08 PM
Response to Original message |
3. After Texas, who knows?? |
|
Like KO said earlier this evening, Clinton "prematurely" declared victory in Texas. Obama will win the delegate count. Give it up Hillary!!!
|
juajen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-11-08 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
10. She won the Texas primary, no question. The caucuses were |
|
also open to questions. Texas is weirdly configurated, but she has doggedly kept on increasing her chances as she goes, after gigantic manipulation of the vote by pugs in so many open primaries and open caucuses. You know that Obama will not win those red states in November, and most of the cross-over republican vote that has been openly allocated to him will disappear in November. Rovian tactics to manipulate our elections, and dems of all persuasions at fault for not seeing it coming. Changes need to be made at the convention.
|
juajen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-11-08 11:08 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Of course it's a loss, but, an expected loss, and she held |
|
the loss to manageable numbers. What is the delegate allocation? Anyone know. Will he gain three our four, or more?
|
EmperorHasNoClothes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-11-08 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
PseudoIntellect
(701 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-11-08 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. I'm going to be saying the same thing when she narrowly wins PA. JK, |
|
Edited on Tue Mar-11-08 11:13 PM by PseudoIntellect
But seriously, if she wins 60/38 in PA, (it'll be by less than that) I should expect the exact same response from you. It was a win in PA, but just a manageable win that was to be expected. 60/38, after all, is close, right?
|
XOKCowboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-11-08 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
Plus about 90K more in the popular vote.
|
tammywammy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-11-08 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
11. "manageable numbers"? |
|
Obama 60% Clinton 38%
That's manageable? :crazy:
|
ossman
(883 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-11-08 11:08 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Pennsylvania.... Jeopardy.... Wapner... Pennsylvania.... K-Mart |
Umbram
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-11-08 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
9. Now if only they had the math skills to do the delegate counting. nt. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:45 PM
Response to Original message |