Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How many male-dominated primaries has Clinton had to compete in?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 12:36 PM
Original message
How many male-dominated primaries has Clinton had to compete in?
Edited on Wed Mar-12-08 12:37 PM by democrattotheend
The answer: 0.

In every single Democratic primary this year (as well as the two caucuses for which there were exit polls, Iowa and Nevada), women have been at least 55% of the vote, usually closer to 60.

Obama, in contrast, has had to contend in many states where blacks are less than 5% of the population in order to "get where he is". He had to get through Iowa and New Hampshire before he could go on to South Carolina. He wasn't even winning among African Americans in South Carolina until he proved in Iowa that his appeal went beyond African Americans.

The media did not make much of the Vermont primary last week, but it's worth noting that while Clinton won by 3 points in Texas, where women outnumbered men 57-43, Obama won by 20 points in Vermont, where whites outnumbered blacks 94-1. Clinton would have lost Texas 51-47 without the female vote; Obama hardly got a boost from Vermont's huge African American community.

According to an analysis I did yesterday, Obama has lost as many votes as he has gained among people who say in the exit polls that race is a factor. I need to update it to include Mississippi, so it's possible he may now get an average of as much as half a percentage point bump from it. Clinton, on average, has gotten a 5-point bump among people who say gender is a factor, and she has won the voters who said gender was a factor in every state except Alabama and Mississippi.

Does being the first African American with a real shot at the presidency add a little bit to Obama's luster? Sure, just as the prospect of electing a woman president makes Clinton more appealing than she otherwise would be for some voters (even me). Interestingly, society seems to accept Clinton running as the "woman candidate", while we expect Obama to go to pains to avoid running as the "black candidate". Clinton frequently mentions her gender and talks about being the first woman president; Obama rarely mentions his race or talks about the historic nature of his candidacy. Clinton has support from groups like EMILY's List and NOW, while the NAACP and other African American political groups have stayed officially neutral, and the conventional wisdom is that their endorsement might hurt Obama.

I don't deny that Clinton has been the victim of sexism at times during the campaign or throughout her career. I have had heated arguments with people who called her a bitch or called her outspokenness "obnoxious." But I think her gender has helped her more than it has hurt her on the campaign trail, and I don't think running as a woman in a primary electorate dominated by women is nearly as tough as being a black man with a Muslim-sounding name running in a primary electorate where probably at least 2/3 of the voters are white, Latino, Asian, or another race other than African American.

Please note that I do not intend this to be an attack on Clinton, and I do not believe she shares Ferraro's views, though I do think she needs to go to greater lengths to distance herself. I just wanted to take an honest look at the impact of race and gender in the primaries, so I hope we can avoid turning this into a flame war. Probably wishful thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. try male plus black women dominated primaries - = all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. huh?
Obama has won in female-dominated primaries in states where there are hardly any black people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slampoet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Wow, you don't read before you respond do you? Do the Frikkin math.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Males and black women dominated in Iowa? Vermont? Utah? Maine? Wisconsin? Connecticut?
Don't think so. Besides, are you suggesting that she should only be expected to do well in primaries where white women dominate (which is most of them?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. after Obama played the race card so as to "consolidate his base"
in SC - yes that is the way he "wins"

NH he lost

VT Dems - I was one - are knee jerk like myself - but many are also anti-female in control plus college turnout was high - how Madeline Kunin got elected was a miracle - but you saw the influence she had in campaigning for Hillary

caucuses dominated by college turnout and lose rules as to who is a registered Dem in the State more or less explain the rest.

In the primaries it seems obvious that males plus black women was 2/3rds the vote every time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Why is wins in quotes?
Are you implying that college students make a win less legitimate? Are they less legitimate as voters than other voters?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. The Dem primary turn-out in Alaska may be majority female, but I doubt the state is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. What difference does that make?
The point is, the majority of voters in the primary are female, thus giving Clinton a bit of an advantage in most states. I don't know for sure about Alaska, since they stopped doing entrance polls for caucus states after Nevada, but women have been the majority of Democratic primary voters in every primary for which exit poll data exists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlyingSquirrel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
8. k&r
Had to go a ways to find a good, coherent post in GDP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 02:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC