Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Kerry's performance on MTP wasn't so hot!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Classical_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 11:08 AM
Original message
Why Kerry's performance on MTP wasn't so hot!
MR. RUSSERT: On Thursday, President Bush broke with the tradition and policy of six predecessors when he said that Israel can keep part of the land seized in the 1967 Middle East War and asserted the Palestinian refugees cannot go back to their particular homes. Do you support President Bush?

SEN. KERRY: Yes.

MR. RUSSERT: Completely?

SEN. KERRY: Yes.

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/4772030/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. Quit trying to start I/P flame wars outside the I/P forum
You want to have an I/P flame war, start it in the I/P forum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Classical_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. It isn't a flame war. It is a discussion about John Kerry
When you get a moderator job. Maybe you can tell me what to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 11:15 AM
Original message
Open discussion is necessary.....
Rank and file thinking only kills this board......The poster has identified an important issue for our candidate to explain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. Please remember
in 1967 the entire Arab coalition was trying to push the Jews into the sea.

It was only then that Israel won that war.

What did you expect them to do, wait to be slaughtered?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Classical_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. settlement prevent them from being slaughtered?
I don't think so.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. Personally, I thought Kerry
hit a grand slam out of the ball park on MTP.

And juxtapose his performance with that of junior's performance on MTP a while back and I can't see why anyone would vote for Bush...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. I agree
In addition, he indicated that if Hamas would stop calling for the destruction of Israel, perhaps progress could be made
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Classical_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. How can progress be made if half the west bank is gone?
?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WVhill Donating Member (245 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. Kerry needs to keep the Jewish vote
especially in New Jersey. To the extent that supporters of Israel feel keeping the land is justified, Kerry may have nullified some of the 9/11 effect that showed up in NY and NJ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Classical_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Clinton kept the jewish vote without doing this
most jews don't support settlements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. You are correct
right now the bush administration is trying to con the Jewish vote that only they have Israel's interest at heart. In reality, they are being used. When bush took office in 2000 he could have continued where Clinton left off, and perhaps the Palestinians might have a state, or well on their way, instead bush did everything to ignore, and perhaps instigate the current crisis
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Classical_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. IF Clinton could win without supporting Likud, why can't
Kerry?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #5
28. The Jewish vote isn't the only vote that's important, though. Bush has
a good portion of the Jewish vote sewn up because of his policies. So, Kerry needs to think about those of us who aren't Jewish, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
12. Sorry, CL. You aren't going to sabotage Kerry's support for November.
Edited on Mon Apr-19-04 11:24 AM by blm
Why waste your time trying to divert support FROM Kerry? I trust Kerry's liberal creds over the last 35 years over someone who claims to be liberal on an internet message board.

Kerry was looking out for ME on BCCI, IranContra and CIA drugrunning investigations he pursued.

Kerry was looking out for ME when he racked up the best environmental record of ALL the candidates including Dennis Kucinich.

Kerry was looking out for ME when he wrote legislation advocating for public financing of alections.

Kerry was looking out for all of us when he testified that gays should be allowed to serve openly in the military.

Who are YOU looking out for?

I don't TRUST anyone who advocates campaigning AGAINST Kerry with the result being Bush gets an easier ride.

No way. No day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Classical_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. I don't advocate campaigning against Kerry
Edited on Mon Apr-19-04 11:23 AM by Classical_Liberal
I don't advocate nader voting or not voting. I am critical of this stand however and will continue to criticize him so long as he moves to the right of Carter and Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. don't worry I will vote for Kerry
Carter and CLinton, both did not advocate going back to the 67 borders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Classical_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. No they advocated the Palestinians negotiating them
rather than us giving the Israelis land we have no authority to give them, like Kerry just did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. Kerry's RECORD is well to Clinton and Carter's left.
Carter and Clinton were both moderate centrists.

Kerry is a liberal who uses moderate language.

Whatever his campaign strategy is he is welcome to it, and deserves the trust of those who NEED him to win in November by any rhetorical means necessary. Kerry knows he can't afford the election to be even close, because close means Bush wins, no matter what.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Classical_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. I don't know why you would welcome a shitty campaign strategy
He is to the right of Clinton and Carter if he approves the Sharon plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. You think he ISN'T consulting with Clinton?
I am quite positive they have discussed all the possible ramifications and, importantly, what they would be capable of correcting come January.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Classical_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. I am voting for him hoping thats the case
Edited on Mon Apr-19-04 11:44 AM by Classical_Liberal
but I ain't going to bet on it. He could correct it right now. I wouldn't be so unhappy with him and the questioning would end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. Like Skinner said, Kerry is president of ?WHAT? right now?
Hmmm he's not President now, is he? That means that what being said is campaign politics, doesn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Classical_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. Then it is bad campaign politics, and a fitting debate
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. IN YOUR OPINION.
Edited on Mon Apr-19-04 12:02 PM by mouse7
Your personal opinion on an issue is not a statement of fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Classical_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Siding with Lieberman is what created the Nader mess last time
Edited on Mon Apr-19-04 12:34 PM by Classical_Liberal
. I don't think the Jewish vote is solidly aligned behind Sharon.

http://www.aljazeerah.info/Opinion%20editorials/2003%20Opinion%20Editorials/August/6%20o/Arab%20Americans%20and%20American%20Jews%20agree%20on%20path%20to%20peace,%20By%20James%20Zogby.htm

There are also many pro-peace swingstates particularly in the upper midewest. Michigan, Iowa and Minnesota.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
13. And on such a hotbutton issue
did anyone really expect him to take a controversial stand?

I'm 100% neutral on the I/P issue. Not only do I not know enough about the history behind it to make a good case one way or the other, I simply do not care. To me, it's the fault of both sides that this conflict has continued, and I apply the blame equally and evenly.

With that in mind, I cannot condemn or praise Kerry for his comment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Classical_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. This is a controversial stand.
or people wouldn't be complaining. The less controversial stand would be to support Clinton and Carter, and to criticize Bush for betraying them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. see?
I did say I didn't know enough about the issue to make an informed decision either way :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. I'm not 100% neutral...
...I say we tell all of them to move out and turn the "Holy Land" into a friggin theme park. Nothing remotely holy about land over which so much blood has been shed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. I say we nuke Jerusaleum
that would end the problem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #13
23. Well, I'm 100% "They're all acting like children" on issue
The whole mess is like an elemantary school food fight only much more deadly. Everyone is yelling, "They gave me cooties... he's touching me... They looked at me."

I couldn't be more disgusted by everyone's conduct if I tried.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 05:12 PM
Original message
Kerry's job now
is to keep a low profile. Let Bush's record speak against Bush, and attack in areas that show that the Democrats were right about waiting to go into Iraq, letting the inspectors finish their job, and trying to get and actual U.N. supported coalition togetther before doing anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
31. Kerry's job now
is to keep a low profile. Let Bush's record speak against Bush, and attack in areas that show that the Democrats were right about waiting to go into Iraq, letting the inspectors finish their job, and trying to get and actual U.N. supported coalition togetther before doing anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
32. The purists strike again
All it takes is one disagreement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Just because someone disagrees with a stance Kerry takes
does not a "purist" make. By that standard one could call you an apologist.

Do you know what happens when the party electorate is unquestioning of it's candidate? You get yourself a Chimp. Think about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Classical_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. If I were a purist, I would want him to cut off aid
Edited on Tue Apr-20-04 12:31 AM by Classical_Liberal
to Israel, as it is I would just like him to not approve of right wing things like giving Sharon settlements on the West Bank.

I voted for Al Gore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
35. Of course you didn't like Kerry's performance
He knocked it out of the park.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Classical_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-20-04 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. If you consider that knocking it out of the park
I don't understand why? Honestly are you seriously trying to get Bush voters? Why wouldn't a Bush voter just vote for Bush?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC