Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Smearing Obama - by Ari Berman

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
gmudem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 08:53 PM
Original message
Smearing Obama - by Ari Berman
I apologize if this has already been posted.

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20080331/berman

He's a Muslim. He was sworn into office on the Koran. He doesn't say the Pledge of Allegiance. His pastor is an anti-Semite. He's a tool of Louis Farrakhan. He's anti-Israel. His advisers are anti-Israel. He's friends with terrorists. The terrorists want him to win. He's the Antichrist.

By now you've probably seen at least some of these e-mails and articles about Barack Obama bouncing around the Internet. They distort Obama's religious faith, question his support for Israel, warp the identity and positions of his campaign advisers and defame his friends and allies from Chicago. The purpose of the smear is to paint him as an Arab-loving, Israel-hating, terrorist-coddling, radical black nationalist. That picture couldn't be further from the truth, but you'd be surprised how many people have fallen for it. The American Jewish community, one of the most important pillars of the Democratic Party and US politics, has been specifically targeted . What started as a largely overlooked fringe attack has been thrust into the mainstream--used as GOP talking points, pushed by the Clinton campaign, echoed by the likes of Meet the Press host Tim Russert. Falsehoods are repeated as fact, and bits of evidence become "elaborate constructions of malicious fantasy," as the Jewish Week, America's largest Jewish newspaper, editorialized.
--
Even if the false claims about Obama originally emanated from the neoconservative right, the Clinton campaign has eagerly pushed them. Clinton operative Sidney Blumenthal has e-mailed damaging stories about Obama to reporters, including a recent article by Batchelor. Clinton fundraiser Annie Totah circulated a column by Ed Lasky before Super Tuesday, with the inscription "Please vote wisely in the Primaries." Clinton adviser Ann Lewis falsely referred to Zbigniew Brzezinski, a critic of AIPAC, as a chief adviser to Obama on a conference call with Jewish reporters. "I can tell you for a fact people from the Clinton campaign are calling reporters and asking them to pay attention to things involving Obama and Israel," says Shmuel Rosner, Washington correspondent for the Israeli daily Ha'aretz. The volume of e-mails about Obama in a given state tends to track the election calendar--hardly a coincidence.

Large American Jewish organizations, like AIPAC and the Orthodox Union, have repeatedly defended Obama. Yet they've had little sway over reactionary elements in both the United States and Israel--including Jewish hate groups--who are eager to keep the smear campaign alive. The website Jews Against Obama, for instance, is run by the Jewish Task Force, which funnels money to the radical settler movement in Israel. (Curiously, John McCain's alliance with Pastor John Hagee of Christians United for Israel, a leading proponent of "end times" theology, and his recent endorsement by former Secretary of State James Baker have received far less scrutiny from pro-Israel pundits. It was Baker, after all, who reportedly told George H.W. Bush, "Fuck the Jews. They didn't vote for us anyway.")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. This thread will largely be ignored just so you know...
Too many posters are in their race rage right now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmudem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'm sure it will.
But I figured I'd go crazy and post a well-reasoned article with no race baiting. What was I thinking? ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. No end in sight
With negatives around 49%, I suppose Clinton had to do something to win. Unfortunately fro the nation, she has chosen "anything" and "everything" as the poison of choice.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barack the house Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. Shocked at Blumenthal so many are showing different side in this. Good article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. This is an excellent article. Too bad Hillary and her supporters are complicit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmudem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Yep.
It really is shocking that the Clinton Campaign would use the "sources" mentioned in this article. They really will do anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Think so? Wait until the Repugs make their move. LOL...
Hillary's campaign has walked on egg shells around Obama!

When the Repugs start beating him like a red headed step child, you'll see my point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. #3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmudem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
23. Obama certainly has withstood the Clinton attacks just fine.
And he's run a significantly better campaign than Clinton has. Clinton supporters keep telling me how Obama can't withstand attacks but he's been doing that very effectively in this campaign. And he already has had to respond to Republican attacks, it's just that Clinton campaign has used those attacks in addition to the ones they came up with themselves.

Haha, change you can xerox. I think Obama did ok responding to that bs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 04:19 AM
Response to Reply #23
42. Maybe yes, maybe no, I guess it depends on what poll one reads.
Edited on Fri Mar-14-08 04:20 AM by greyghost
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. I KNEW IT!!! "He's a tool of Louis Farrakhan. He's anti-Israel."
That's all I needed to read. Thanks

(snark ... big time)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karmicglee Donating Member (57 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. Once upon a time, articles belonged in the Editorials and Other Articles forum
I suggest that someone move it there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmudem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Once upon a time?
You've been a member since yesterday lol. And this article is clearly about the primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karmicglee Donating Member (57 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 09:15 PM
Original message
Yes, but only OPINIONS about primaries are allowed in this forum
Editorials and Articles about the primaries and other political issues belong in the Editorials and Articles section.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmudem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
17. Whatever.
Edited on Thu Mar-13-08 09:20 PM by gmudem
Only opinions? No facts are allowed? Sorry I didn't mean to bring up facts in GD: Primaries.

And as I said, you've been a member since yesterday so it's funny that you think you're an expert on the rules. The other longtime members who have posted in this thread don't seem to mind where I posted it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #17
27. Please ignore the "sockpuppet", he has been TS'd repeatedly...
but keeps finding ways to come back. Seems very familiar with the rules of the board, only just having arrived yesterday. Go figure. Let him alert, if he thinks it should be moved, that's why we have mods.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
18. They belong wherever the hell someone chooses to post them...
including here, where they may serve to inspire DISCUSSION (the point of this forum, embodied in the name).

If you have a problem with that, I would suggest you go elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
47. You say that because this is something you don't want to read
There have been numerous posts from editorials for years on this forum. You are so funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. You mean before you became a zombie? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karmicglee Donating Member (57 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Even now, articles belong in the Editorials and Articles forum
Only member opinions are allowed in this forum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. You're wrong...
Edited on Thu Mar-13-08 09:21 PM by Spider Jerusalem
and I've been here for SIX YEARS, so I think I have a better idea of what I'm talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmudem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. So articles from The Nation aren't allowed to be discussed
on a Democratic forum? Why don't you just read the article instead of trying to screw with the thread?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #20
28. self delete: replied to wrong post
Edited on Thu Mar-13-08 10:05 PM by Tarheel_Dem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. Good Article.
Thanks for Posting. :)
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. This sensible well written post is destined to sink like a rock in here lol
thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
30. Hey GC..thanks for alerting me to that brilliant post....(eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cottonseed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
13. Well worth a nudge.
Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
16. James Baker always did give me the creeps!
But he was a Republican, so I could deal with it. Too bad that Democratic leaders are not giving me the creeps; that wasn't supposed to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
22. Shame on Sidney Blumenthal..I hope
he's happy when Obama gets to be Prez and his reputaion is damaged 'cause of bilary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
24. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
25. These misrepresentations of Obama did not come from the Clinton campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmudem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Any facts to back up that statement?
Just saying it does not make it so. Perhaps you should, I dunno, read the article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
29. K&R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robeson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
31. Very telling. This passage stuck out to me....
..."Even if the false claims about Obama originally emanated from the neoconservative right, the Clinton campaign has eagerly pushed them. Clinton operative Sidney Blumenthal has e-mailed damaging stories about Obama to reporters, including a recent article by Batchelor. Clinton fundraiser Annie Totah circulated a column by Ed Lasky before Super Tuesday, with the inscription "Please vote wisely in the Primaries." Clinton adviser Ann Lewis falsely referred to Zbigniew Brzezinski, a critic of AIPAC, as a chief adviser to Obama on a conference call with Jewish reporters. "I can tell you for a fact people from the Clinton campaign are calling reporters and asking them to pay attention to things involving Obama and Israel," says Shmuel Rosner, Washington correspondent for the Israeli daily Ha'aretz. The volume of e-mails about Obama in a given state tends to track the election calendar--hardly a coincidence."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
32. We all knew the Clinton people were pushing the smears.
Now we have it out in the open.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
33. K&R n/t!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Booth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
34. "the Clinton campaign has eagerly pushed them"
You know, I realize presidential politics are bare-knuckled.

But the fact that the Clinton campaign seems to delight so much in debasing democracy really bothers me for some reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metric System Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. Are Obama supporters forgetting the Obama camp's memo that Russert revealed during the Nevada
debate? You don't call that trying to push the media to focus their coverage in a certain direction?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Booth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. You're right, it is.
But that's one example vs. many examples of Hillary's campaign pushing the media. Some people see the Clintons' win at all costs attitude as an attribute, but I'd say it's getting just a little old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #34
39. Yes, both eagerly and gleefully.
They should be ashamed, but of course they aren't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
35. kick
oh and recommended, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
38. maybe the Clinton supporters should look around
Edited on Fri Mar-14-08 12:20 AM by DearAbby
when your sources are Right wing hacks, something stinks...know what I mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
40. K & R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 02:15 AM
Response to Original message
41. Great piece
thanks for posting. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
better tomorrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 04:24 AM
Response to Original message
43. here's the truth....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voice for Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #43
48. thanks for that link
while I was there on YouTube I watched Obama's interview w/Charlie Rose
which I'd never seen -- very good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 04:26 AM
Response to Original message
44. A very big K&R
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
From The Left Donating Member (670 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
45. The Likuds Hate Obama and Worship Hillary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
46. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC