Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Seperation of Church and State. Freedom of Religion.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 07:36 AM
Original message
Seperation of Church and State. Freedom of Religion.
Judge a candidate by their actions. Consider your support based on what they have done with their political career and what platform they stand on, now.

Where someone goes to practice their religion has no business in the political arena. A person can simultaneously worship in way you disagree with, and still promote political principles on which you agree.

I have disagreed with the religions and the pastors of every candidate I have ever cast a vote for. Going after one's place of worship is not a winning strategy, as the attendee and the pastor are separate individuals.

Pastor Wright playing out a news cycle raises the hair of many, but should put some other arguments to rest. Obama is not a Muslim, and he should be seen as "black enough". The video's of Wright will have to be dealt with swiftly for the faint-of-heart Middle America, who have a hard time understanding that you can go to church and leave you religious beliefs at the door to your government office. Obama and his campaign have known since they started that this would come up, at some point. They are prepared, and have made comments previously.

If the Obama campaign is skilled enough to win the Nomination and go on to be President, they will know how to put this to bed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Saturday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. If the Obama campaign were "skilled enough" they wouldn't have
put Wright on the Steering Committee. His inexperience is showing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemVet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Agreed.
No way is this guy on any of Obama's committees or advising groups if they had known this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. He isn't on any committees, hasn't been for some time.
But, Obama does need to get out there and head this off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. Sorry
Edited on Fri Mar-14-08 07:54 AM by MonkeyFunk
the Establishment Clause has no bearing on whether people can, or should, judge a candidate's religious beliefs and affiliations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. You're absolutely right.
Everyone is free to support, for any reason at all. Many people vote based on religious beliefs. Catholics voted for Kennedy in large numbers. Chimpy got a lot of evangelicals. It isn't what I base my vote on.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. You wouldn't reject a candidate
whose religious beliefs prevent him from believing in evolution, or civil rights for all people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. I certainly would.
You make a good point. But, there is a difference between a candidate affirming such beliefs, and a pastor saying it.

I think it is important for Obama to distance himself from the inflammatory statements made.

What Obama supporters do you think this could be a deal-breaker for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. IF the candidate believed in evolution, it would depend on......
if they pushed that belief on the public. If the candidate truly believes in the separation of church and state, then they will not push their belief on public. Civil rights for all people is not a religious issue, it's one of ethics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. well
I'm just saying that I've never voted FOR someone because of their religious beliefs, but I've got no problem voting AGAINST them because of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
6. If religion has no business in the political arena, then
there should be no faith-based campaigning. No campaigning in churches, from pulpits, and no religious leaders publicly campaigning for or supporting any candidate from their position as spiritual leader.

I don't have to share a faith with a candidate, or particularly like that faith, to vote and support him or her.

I don't want any elected official's faith in office, either. When I see a candidate who allows his church, or his faith, to get to cozy with his politics, he has lost any chance of my support. I want a separation that is deep and wide, not a thin veil that provides the illusion of separation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. I agree 100%.
I don't like hearing any candidates mentioning any of their beliefs while campaigning.

I don't even like hear them say "god bless America" all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noel711 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
11. This bogus.....
Remember all the crazy ass things those evangels would
say in their support of Geo.W.???

They nearly called him the second coming,
and raved about the bizarre rapture,
and the rebuilding of the temple in Israel.

This is bogus...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC