Skink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-14-08 09:54 AM
Original message |
Wouldn't Federal matching funds be enough to redo Fla and Mich? |
|
Whichever dem gets the nom is not going to take them yet...
I think it would be a great step foward to public financing of campaigns by useing federal dollars to finance primary elections. The reason most states still have Caucuses is becuase they don't cost much.
|
gristy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-14-08 10:06 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Those funds are to fund the campaigns of candidates - not elections |
Skink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-14-08 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. right but since our Government funds things by say raiding Social security... |
|
Edited on Fri Mar-14-08 10:12 AM by Skink
couldn't we as citizens insist?
But my point is wouldn't this be a sep toward public financing of elections?
|
gristy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-14-08 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. states finance the voting part of elections - that isn't going to change |
|
Regardless of the issues in FL and MI.
|
Skink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-14-08 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. I think that is the problem. The Presidency should be a federal election. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:45 AM
Response to Original message |