Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bob Graham Doesn't Have a Hope in Hell of Being Kerry's VP.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
robsul82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 12:56 PM
Original message
Bob Graham Doesn't Have a Hope in Hell of Being Kerry's VP.
Hey people. I've been reading these "Graham's gonna be the VP!" posts left and right for the past few days, and it's really just insanity to me. If Kerry wants to lose worse than Mondale, he'll pick Bobby G. Why?

The notebooks. There is no way on EARTH Bob Graham could be a viable VP with the public knowledge that he details every single waking moment of his life in notebooks for...I don't even know what, future generations to read? The Democratic Party would be a pinata for the neocons if Graham was chosen, and you can bank on that.

Simply put: Bob Graham could be from a state with 538 electoral votes and he would STILL be a horrible, horrible choice because he...the man friggin' takes notes on himself!

Geez.

Later.

RJS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hmmmm
Bob Graham reads robsul82's DU comment on "Bob Graham Doesn't Have a Hope in Hell of Being Kerry's VP" .
Bob Graham thinks about it.
Bob Graham thinks he'd rather be Secy of State
Bob Graham moves on to next DU thread.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freetobegay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Are you from Florida?
Do you know Florida History with Bob Graham?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robsul82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. What good is winning Florida...
...if 49 other states think the guy's a friggin' wacko? Which he actually might be anyway, for that matter.

Later.

RJS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freetobegay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Did I say anything about winning Florida?
Edited on Fri Apr-23-04 01:09 PM by freetobegay
I would just like to point out you know nothing of Bob Graham except one little factoid. His Senate record alone is enough to make him a great VP let alone his recored in Florida.

Just my 2 cents.

ON EDIT: do you have proof of "...if 49 other states think the guy's a friggin' wacko? Which he actually might be anyway, for that matter." Or is this just the usual smear campaign tactic?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robsul82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. That WOULD BE what they'd say about him.
How EASY would it be to paint a guy as a psycho if he takes notes about his day obsessively in notebooks dating back TWENTY YEARS? Face it - there's NO hope with Graham. He will not be chosen.

If Kerry has any sense, that is.

Later.

RJS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. How do you think they'll
paint a guy who is on the record channeling an unborn child?

"In 1985, a 31-year-old North Carolina lawyer named John Edwards stood before a jury and channeled the words of an unborn baby girl.”

"She speaks to you through me," the lawyer went on in his closing argument. "And I have to tell you right now — I didn't plan to talk about this — right now I feel her. I feel her presence. She's inside me, and she's talking to you." http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/31/politics/campaign/31EDWA.html?ex=1390885200&en=4fb97ac07a96f186&ei=5007&partner=USERLAND


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cuban_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Still have that hardon for Edwards, I see.
nice to know some things never change... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freetobegay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. What are you talking about?
Where is Edwards mentioned here? I thought we were discussing Bob Graham? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Finch Donating Member (487 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bob Graham ehy?
. Decent enough guy, potential sectary of defense or homeland security, But NOT VP...

.Would have any big pulling power amongst moderate voters.

.Doesn't really help in the Midwest.

.Can't grantee carrying FL into the Kerry column.

.Doesn't really balance the ticket that well.

.Not the greatest debtor in the world, and against Cheney IMHO he would be toast.

.with Edwards he might have been a good pick but with Kerry NO, Kerry really needs a younger Dem on the ticket, Edwards, Warner, Bayh, Landrieu perhaps Nelson but not someone like Graham... let him go to defense or homeland security if we win but do not give him the VP slot...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHBowden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. I don't see how we can go wrong with Wes.
Clark brings a lot of advantages and no disadvantages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. You really don't think he has any disadvantages?
You might want to step back and take an objective look. I like Clark, as any long-time DU-er here will attest, but he's not ten-feet tall and Teflon-coated. He has vulnerabilities, just like the rest of the 'contenders' do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salonghorn70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
11. I agree-it won't be Grahm
Gore already passed over him in 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Of course
Gore also ended up choosing an even worse choice -- Lieberman.

God, I wonder how many voters the democrats lost to Nader with that choice.

I myself remember hearing Lieberman on Imus stating "there is no freedom from religion, only freedom from religion" and remember thinking, this is the democratic choice for a VP candidate?.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC