Why does Kerry defend Bush's record, when they bash his (re terrorism)?

[fujiyama]

I still can't get over his comment the other day. What the hell is wrong with him? He's claiming the terrorists will lose regardless of whom wins.

What the hell is that even supposed to mean? He's running almost the same way the dems ran in 2002. It was a disaster.

So many allegations have come out regarding how badly the administration dropped the ball on this issue. It must be the idiot DLC advisors Kerry has.

Meanwhile all they do is continuously attack him as being soft on defense. God, a man that fights for his country in war, can't even defend himself against a bunch of chickenhawks?

[montanacowboy]

1. Yes, it is unbelievable isn't it?

it's the same old song folks - "we support the "president"...blah....stay the course, only we will bring in an international force...right...(excuse me, from where? MARS?)
Kerry is playing the old DLC game and guess what, he will lose if he keeps this up.

He has no different opinion than the moran on the war or on the Israeli thing - he is not attacking and he is always defending himself. This guy just is not going to cut it.

Where is Howard Dean?????????????????????????????????????

[Upfront]

2. Dean

Oh, the DLC did not want Dean as he was for the people. We are in deep shit people, face it. Tall Bush is DLC all the way. Dean is out there backing the peoples choice, where else would he be? He is after all, Howard Dean, and for the people!!!!!!!

[sandnsea]

3. That the terrorists will lose

Are you rooting for al qaeda to win?

[Old and In the Way]

4. Kerry won't undermine troops in the field.

He's not going to question Bush directly on this action because that's not particularly helpful to the troops in Iraq. Kerry knows that this action was imminently stupid and totally unnecessary. But we are there and he's not going to say anything that could be used by these bastards to paint Kerry as not supporting the troops.